FeiRR
Banned
If Kinect isn't required, what does the Xbox One do differently?
You pay more money for less hardware power. I think you can call it a feature.
If Kinect isn't required, what does the Xbox One do differently?
I really really hope they don't create a bundle without Kinect. When developers know for sure that every One owner is also a Kinect owner, they'll have an incentive to create great Kinect games or games with creative and interesting use of the device. That wasn't the case on the 360.
Why do peopel still think this? Just look at the launch lineup
Chû Totoro;76134323 said:Sony is now in panic mode... Microsoft is back in the game.
I said they shouldn't be that arrogant. For once Microsoft listening to the gaming community complaints (even when they could have somehow kept their vision for some points imo) and still being quite humble makes Sony's PR looking like stupid people. Well, it's not like gaming company's PR are that good at their job anyway.
So :
- no always online required (only first connection)
- no DRM (equivalent to Xbox 360 at least)
- no kinect required
Now, for the better it's just about games !
Chû Totoro;76134323 said:Sony is now in panic mode... Microsoft is back in the game.
I said they shouldn't be that arrogant. For once Microsoft listening to the gaming community complaints (even when they could have somehow kept their vision for some points imo) and still being quite humble makes Sony's PR looking like stupid people. Well, it's not like gaming company's PR are that good at their job anyway.
So :
- no always online required (only first connection)
- no DRM (equivalent to Xbox 360 at least)
- no kinect required
Now, for the better it's just about games !
Why do peopel still think this? Just look at the launch lineup, if they want people to get excitet about gaming with kinect they will have to show us why. MS keep saying the great core games will come, you will see. Well they have been saying that for the last 3 years. Kinect 2 might be better im sure but without proof im not going to spend and extra 100 bucks on it.
Show us great kinect games MS not interface, voice and tv controls. Then i will consider it.
If I ever buy an Xbox that kinect is going straight into the trash
At this point I'd have more respect for MS if they had the courage to actually stand by their original vision for this thing.
Their total reversals of Xbone policy mere months after releasing the console make them look weak and indecisive.
With their original vision for the Xbone now totally compromised where do they go from here and how could they have gotten it so fundamentally wrong?
At this point I'd have more respect for MS if they had the courage to actually stand by their original vision for this thing.
Their total reversals of Xbone policy mere months after releasing the console make them look weak and indecisive.
The 'MS is looking weak now' line of thought is the American equivalent of 'Square just shot themselves in the foot'.
At this point I'd have more respect for MS if they had the courage to actually stand by their original vision for this thing.
Their total reversals of Xbone policy mere months after releasing the console make them look weak and indecisive.
With their original vision for the Xbone now totally compromised where do they go from here and how could they have gotten it so fundamentally wrong?
Do you judge every console generation by the launch lineup? The PS2 and 360 must be failed products in your eyes.
One step closer to a kinectless SKU.
I read somewhere earlier in the year the sensor costs almost as much as the console itself so they could probably have it priced at $349 or $374 usd without kinect.
The Xbox One still has many extra features over the PS4. Being the all in one media center and making every TV "smart" being big things for some people.
Actually it bring into the mind of people who are aware of the total turnaround that MSFT can totally change everything for the worse in the bat of an eye.
For the others that don't follow closely, it's merely the crap products that take customer rights and spy on you.
Rumours work that way you know.
Perhaps you would have a point if the console were a couple of years into its cycle, but it hasn't even been released yet. And you're completely ignoring why they changed it in the first place - because the customer demanded it. It makes absolutely no sense to piss off that same customer after winning him back.
ps2/360 had kinect mandatory?
The worst part is that it shows absolutely no confidence in their vision or their products.
As a customer I wouldn't put more confidence in the product than the company that made it.
That's the bigger issue IMO.
What are you talking about? The only people being arrogant were Microsoft by trying to force ridiculous policies that everybody hated. They have been FORCED to change these due to the backlash. Sony has done nothing wrong in all this time. The only people with stupid looking PR are Microsoft at this point. I'm astounded that you even tried to spin it this way.Chû Totoro;76134323 said:Sony is now in panic mode... Microsoft is back in the game.
I said they shouldn't be that arrogant. For once Microsoft listening to the gaming community complaints (even when they could have somehow kept their vision for some points imo) and still being quite humble makes Sony's PR looking like stupid people. Well, it's not like gaming company's PR are that good at their job anyway.
So :
- no always online required (only first connection)
- no DRM (equivalent to Xbox 360 at least)
- no kinect required
Now, for the better it's just about games !
You could say that about the cancellation of DRM which is the only "true" 180 that happened at MS.
But how is giving the user the ability to unplug his kinect a lack of confidence ? As long as the kinect is still packed in and all its features are available, their "vision" still holds.
I really don't understand the reactions to this announcement. People act like MS cancelled all kinect features altogether, when all they did was give an additional option that people were asking for already.
No they didn't announce anything like that. I just refer to the discussion I had with some in the 'Sony: 'Don't be jerks' if you want indies to work with you' thread.Did Sony announce something I wasn't aware?
You can't lend games to friends anymore or something?
How, exactly?
Microsoft needs to market the shit out of this. Just an announcement on Twitter isn't going to cut it. The news that Xbox One is not user-friendly is already out there, if they want to sell, they need to spin that around.
What are you talking about? The only people being arrogant were Microsoft by trying to force ridiculous policies that everybody hated. They have been FORCED to change these due to the backlash. Sony has done nothing wrong in all this time. The only people with stupid looking PR are Microsoft at this point. I'm astounded that you even tried to spin it this way.
Chû Totoro;76136379 said:No they didn't announce anything like that. I just refer to the discussion I had with some in the 'Sony: 'Don't be jerks' if you want indies to work with you' thread.
Sony has a very good system (the best imo both specs and gaming wise) but they need to focus on what they have to offer and don't try to focus on what the others don't have. It'll just be obvious for everyone if their job is well done. And I also said that Microsoft proved that they can listen to some complaints. And here we have the proof that they are trying to go the right way. Once all the big flaws Xbox One are out what will Sony have? The games... and it's not just something written on a piece of paper. It's not specs. It takes time and it's more challenging to prove that you have the best games... Now it's the good times that awaits us : gameplay videos, interviews about the content of the games, previews, reviews etc.
I'm laughing my ass off.Chû Totoro;76134323 said:Sony is now in panic mode... Microsoft is back in the game.
I said they shouldn't be that arrogant. For once Microsoft listening to the gaming community complaints (even when they could have somehow kept their vision for some points imo) and still being quite humble makes Sony's PR looking like stupid people. Well, it's not like gaming company's PR are that good at their job anyway.
So :
- no always online required (only first connection)
- no DRM (equivalent to Xbox 360 at least)
- no kinect required
Now, for the better it's just about games !
They also have the price and the more appealing product.
Seriously if you think that given the choice between the two people would choose a xbone you're living in the US and that's all.
Chû Totoro;76136831 said:You're misinterpreting my posts. I'm not saying Microsoft has won thanks to this. It may not be a game changer but it's still a very good thing for them and all the people interested in the Xbox One.
For me Xbox One was when first announced a bad gaming system (maybe excellent for other things but yet for gaming... no, sorry) and now it's a good gaming system with great games (depending on your tastes... I personally don't like the Xbox One launch games).
Or at least it deserves some attention. The price is of course important but the price is tied to the value you put in all they have to offer. For some, the TV functions or the exclusives are going to justify the 100$ difference.
I'm laughing my ass off.
Actually, SONY did everything right since february 2013 (PS4 reveal).
MS did everything wrong, brings one 180 after another and is playing catch up with the PS4 since the XBone reveal.
No idea what you're smoking.
Exactly. I'm not interested either but I salute their efforts (it doesn't "spy" and "take resale rights"... anymore at least).Ah ok.
I think no one can deny that it is fantastic news for the xbone.
It's only relevant to the xbone and may make it become a not laughing stock of the market in everywhere but the US.
But it's still DOA in anywhere but the US and what they've shown so far doesn't help at all.
Again, if you're not interested it's still that crappy machine who take your resale rigths and spy on you at night, whether it's true or not.
Chû Totoro;76136995 said:Agree with your post. And that's the start of what I'm explaining. Read again and you'll understand that the only thing I'm trying to make you understand is that while Microsoft is playing catch up they may succeed and have a comparable gaming offer when launching their system.
You made your choice, it's obvious. That doesn't mean that some people who were deceive by Microsoft's announcements won't be happy to change their minds because they now can play the franchises they like on a system working how they want.
Now sell an XBone without one, and I may consider it.
I don't see this as a 180 at all. Kinect is still a pack in and the userbase is not fragmented. Every developer can use Kinect functionality.
This is GREAT news is it not ? You can unplug it if you want to but in doing so you will degrade your UI experience. I can't believe that people turn this into a negative. It's exactly what GAF was wanting. Kinect to not be required to make the system work.
This is how I feel. Confirm for me that I can use it as a devkit and I'll probably bite.
Now sell an XBone without one, and I may consider it.
Sometimes the Neogaf gang reminds me of this...
If people can't afford to spend the retail price that is on the XONE then they should get a PS4.
Kinect is not separate to the XONE, it is part of the product which can be turned off if required by the user. It shouldn't be viewed as 2 separate items. The vision of the product is with kinect. As such, it is priced accordingly.
It would be great news if they didnt bundle it with Kinect and were able to price the console accordingly.
Not forcing that huge ugly useless camera onto people is definitely A Good Thing.
But MS is just completely adrift. I'm sure if GAF tried hard enough it could convince MS to add cup holders to XB1.
But don't complain about the Kinect using its previous iteration, which was never properly integrated into the console's userbase, as a means to prop up your argument against Kinect 2. That is disingenuous.
Yeah, I made my choice. I already posted that once, in a different thread.Chû Totoro;76136995 said:Agree with your post. And that's the start of what I'm explaining. Read again and you'll understand that the only thing I'm trying to make you understand is that while Microsoft is playing catch up they may succeed and have a comparable gaming offer when launching their system.
You made your choice, it's obvious. That doesn't mean that some people who were deceive by Microsoft's announcements won't be happy to change their minds because they now can play the franchises they like on a system working how they want.
Exactly. I'm not interested either but I salute their efforts (it doesn't "spy" and "take resale rights"... anymore at least).
Sure, it's all a reaction to GAF and not at all to the bad buzz about privacy issues and data leaks that has been running in the media...