Marty Chinn
Member
360 was anti-consumer how?
"Things break" =)
360 was anti-consumer how?
You don't understand. Playing what games? If Microsoft didn't enter the market, you would be playing Halo on PS3 instead. No big deal. No loss.
Just picking this post out of a vacuum: don't forget they're offering free games with XBLG subscriptions. It's not implausible someone decides "sure why not", gets a year again... and dumps it immediately afterwards. I really am half considering that, one last year for Xbox before sticking with PS4.I am actually quite excited for the Xbox One and think that MS may have a very important advantage heading into next gen. They already have people locked in.
![]()
For reference, the PSN+ 12 month is at #79.
I know for many people on here, including myself, the $50 for XBL Gold or PSN+ won't really stop you from getting what you'd like but I think many people who only get 1 console or are on a budget, a $100 swing for switching ($50 on service 1 + $50 on service 2) is even more of an impediment.
How on earth can a console be finished before the gen has even started?
You don't understand. Playing what games? If Microsoft didn't enter the market, you would be playing Halo on PS3 instead. No big deal. No loss.
I couldn't disagree more. No one I know who currently has a kinect system for their Xbox 360 (including me) is at all interested in it for Xbox One. No one.
The biggest issue as far as we are concerned is the frankly ridiculous asking price of Xbox One at £430 in the UK. It's stupidly excessively expensive. We are not going near that with a barge pole.
What company, once becoming a monopoly, in history has become more consumer friendly? That doesn't happen..ever. Sony, of all companies, should be one of the last ones you would even THINK would become consumer focused w/out competition. This is just a ridiculous conversation if you believe this.
360 was anti-consumer how?
Haha, what?
If Sony didn't enter the market, you would be playing Final Fantasy VII on Saturn instead. No big deal. No loss.
And despite all of this I am more excited for the XboxOne.
How can that be?
Games -> Forza, TitanFall (not counting multiplats).
You said they would get worse and I agreed. You should probably stop raging so hard.
But that's just a hypothetical that doesn't exist in any version of reality. But I hope they do that, because it'd be nice for someone to be competitive with Sony next-gen.
I'd wait on the Wii U (though if it's 3rd place it'll be because Microsoft fucked up that badly more than anything else at this point), but Saturn lost literally from starting prematurely. Not so much as dead before it arrived so much as it just ARRIVED and thus died, almost like forcing a baby to be born far in advance of the normal 9 months.Ask the saturn. edit: or the WiiU lol
Speaking as a gamer I agree with you, but I don't see the Kinect as a game device. Its a remote control, a new user interface, and its application for non-games and apps could be astounding. Thats why I think they should keep it. A few games here and there for dancing or fitness, or voice commands to bypass menus in games also make for optional extras that could be nice.I couldn't disagree more. No one I know who currently has a kinect system for their Xbox 360 (including me) is at all interested in it for Xbox One. No one.
The biggest issue as far as we are concerned is the frankly ridiculous asking price of Xbox One at £430 in the UK. It's stupidly excessively expensive. We are not going near that with a barge pole.
Hubris is exactly what brought us the Xbox One. Hubris, and taking their preferred existing customer base for granted, all while marginalizing the 30% or so who never took their consoles online.It didn't stop Microsoft coming up with Xbox One.
Well I never ever thought they'd do a 180 on the DRM thing. I think they are very sensitive now on making the Xbox One's launch successful. They must by now have a clear idea of pre-order ratios. There is only so much they can play with. Dropping the Kinect and price would be a hard decision. But surely no harder then the DRM reversal.
Hmm with Ps4s crappy launch line up i dont think it has nothing to worry about
even though the xbox does not have a AAA launch lineup they will have titles that appeal to more gamers....and they have a heap more coming out the pipe than sony in the first 12 months.
The price is the only advantage they have and would not be surprised if they drop or add more value by having a pack in game and a discount gold subscription.
Agreed. With no microsoft, Sony doesn't have a viable competitor at ALL. Sorry, but nintendo hasn't had the ability and desire to compete with Sony since the N64.
I'd much rather have sales parity and microsoft in the market, than anyone dominating.
You agreed but how would things improve with MS gone as you said?
360 was anti-consumer how?
I'd wait on the Wii U (though if it's 3rd place it'll be because Microsoft fucked up that badly more than anything else at this point), but Saturn lost literally from starting prematurely. Not so much as dead before it arrived so much as it just ARRIVED and thus died, almost like forcing a baby to be born far in advance of the normal 9 months.
If Kinect's dropped it's post-launch window, if rumors are true they're dropping the Kinect requirement from the system itself, but that'd require a firmware update probably just like the online DRM and as such it'd need to come with the system anyway. Plus it's a handy backup plan in case the price really IS too high (which it probably is), give in and just dump it come summer to drop the price faster.No way they drop Kinect; it is integral to everything they are doing. You can say the same for DRM though...I just don't see Kinect going anywhere.
Yeah, I definitely think they undermined what novelty it had, and now that everyone tried it they'd probably look at it and assume the worst. Kind of like why Motion Plus never really took off despite being a cheap add-on and built into all Wii Remotes after a certain point.i still think that ms' decision to release the kinect for the 360, rather than wait for the xbone, was a double-edged sword. yeah, it sold well, but what could've been novel's already had time to burn out...
Yeah, I was being kind of nitpicky with the Saturn really given we didn't even HAVE a chance to react before release: it just came out of the blue.The Saturn got hamstrung by a botched US launch, and Sony sucker punching it on price.
The WiiU is selling at saturn-esque levels with no next gen competition. Third parties are jumping ship. Once Sony and MS hit, it's going to be a bloodbath. A WiiU is only $50 less than a PS4. Anyone who isn't a die hard nintendo fan has no reason to pick up the thing.
I couldn't disagree more. No one I know who currently has a kinect system for their Xbox 360 (including me) is at all interested in it for Xbox One. No one...
PS2 says otherwise. Gamers didn't "suffer" during that gen. Moreover there will always be competition between game developers.
Speaking as a gamer I agree with you, but I don't see the Kinect as a game device. Its a remote control, a new user interface, and its application for non-games and apps could be astounding. Thats why I think they should keep it. A few games here and there for dancing or fitness, or voice commands to bypass menus in games also make for optional extras that could be nice.
I could. I could also imagine far worse than what MS proposed.Even if Sony had a monopoly, it couldn't have possibly been worse than what Microsoft envisioned with the Xbox One (and as far as anyone knows, still might).
Which is true and why I think they'll just take the hits for now and try to relaunch later with a lower price or with amazing bundles. Just a guess of course.Yeah. I agree with this as well. But why make it mandatory. If I want those added features and they are important to me then I'll pony up the wedge to buy the thing like I did the last time.
For a vast number of gamers. They are not going to interested in it.
If Sony didn't enter the market, you would be playing Final Fantasy VII on Nintendo 64 instead. No big deal. No loss.
Hmm with Ps4s crappy launch line up i dont think it has nothing to worry about
even though the xbox does not have a AAA launch lineup they will have titles that appeal to more gamers....and they have a heap more coming out the pipe than sony in the first 12 months.
The price is the only advantage they have and would not be surprised if they drop or add more value by having a pack in game and a discount gold subscription.
haha, man it's hard to take some people seriously. I mean, this post reads like you're just willing yourself to ignore everything that has happened. The price is the only advantage? Where have you been?
You also keep prattling on about how Xbox One's first year lineup is going to dominate (in every topic you care to comment about it), when the comparison is being made with woefully incomplete information.
Of the 15-17 or so first year exclusive titles Microsoft is said to have, they're only missing like 1-3 announcements. I can show you the list; it's nearly complete. Of the first 20 first year exclusives titles PS4 has, only 5 have been announced - Killzone, Drive Club, Knack, InFamous: Second Son and The Order. How can you claim to know which has the best first year lineup when we only know of like 25-30% of what Sony is going to be offering, but we know 80-90% of what Microsoft is going to be offering?
Put down the rose tinted goggles my friend.
No way they drop Kinect; it is integral to everything they are doing. You can say the same for DRM though...I just don't see Kinect going anywhere.
Introduced and heavily pushed for micro-transactions one of the biggest cancers of the industry today, introduced the pay-for-P2P model Sony has now adopted (fuck you too Sony), ridiculously expensive proprietary peripherals, their disgusting attitude regarding RROD, from the fact that they released a product they knew was faulty before release to the fact that they did everything in their power to hide that disaster.
Sales aren't their own incentive? GAF relies all too heavily on this "competition is good" conventional wisdom. There is nothing inherently good about competition in a marketplace and plenty of cases when it does nothing but taint the market. The console market has certainly seen it's fair share of dysfunctional behavior for the sake of "competition".YOU don't understand that without competition Sony would have no incentive to be portrayed as they are right now.
Someone will fill the void.
Even if Sony had a monopoly, it couldn't have possibly been worse than what Microsoft envisioned with the Xbox One (and as far as anyone knows, still might).
I've not seen a single thing on the new Kinect which has made me say wow. I must have that device. It's definitely worth the extra £80 for the machine.
No, they suffered afterwards when Sony announced the PS3. Talk about kicking the can up the road.
The latter half of your post is hyperbole, OP.
Yeah, they will. It's even prominent in other websites that the DRM issue is done and over with. The main complaint for the Xbone is the fact that is $500.
Writing off the consumer as "stupid", while true because the popular majority will buy up anything they know is good from past experience, doesn't really help your argument as well. Yes, MS, wanted to systematically screw over consumers. They fucked up, and they're restarting. It's done and over with. Discussing something that happened, proved to be fucked up, and using it as the basis for an argument...doesn't do your argument any favors.
But, again, your opinion.
somewhere within the next year or two, Sony is going to announce Demon's Souls 2...and it's going to be glorious when it happens.
I've not seen a single thing on the new Kinect which has made me say wow. I must have that device. It's definitely worth the extra £80 for the machine.
Sales aren't their own incentive? GAF relies all too heavily on this "competition is good" conventional wisdom. There is nothing inherently good about competition in a marketplace and plenty of cases when it does nothing but taint the market. The console market has certainly seen it's fair share of dysfunctional behavior for the sake of "competition".
It's amazing this place still champions competition given that the logical progression of that philosophy has directly led to the massive clusterf*ck product overreaches like the PS3 and the XBO. A large part of why the console market is as messed up as it is, is because of competition.
Does anyone still think Microsoft will outright win even?
Does anyone still think Microsoft will outright win even? It's seems pretty telling that no one has even made a strong case for how they could win without making broad changes to their current plans. The best that can be said is that it will be on par with the ps4 or maybe selling more in the US while Sony dominates the world market?
What happens when they are both selling out at launch, but because Sony might be manufacturing more as rumored, they achieve a much higher installed base in the first year? Does this have a snowball effect causing more customers and maybe developers to jump onboard?
Outside of these polls there's still significant factors favoring Sony that are at play. I don't see how Microsoft will come out on top this time.
Does anyone still think Microsoft will outright win even? It's seems pretty telling that no one has even made a strong case for how they could win without making broad changes to their current plans. The best that can be said is that it will be on par with the ps4 or maybe selling more in the US while Sony dominates the world market?
What happens when they are both selling out at launch, but because Sony might be manufacturing more as rumored, they achieve a much higher installed base in the first year? Does this have a snowball effect causing more customers and maybe developers to jump onboard?
Outside of these polls there's still significant factors favoring Sony that are at play. I don't see how Microsoft will come out on top this time.