It boggles me how they are even making money off of this in the first place. Companies make sure it's exceedingly hard to monetize gaming videos, yet this stuff appears to very easily slip through the cracks?
Well I suppose it's Spiderman (Marvel/Sony?) and Elsa (Disney) Would this not just land them in same spot as sterling? no monetisation but not pulled either. This seems to still be monetised however so maybe neither company wants to acknowledge that this is a thing.
"Spiderman" isn't trademarked; "Spider-Man" is. "Elsa" is literally a name.
These kids are gunna grow up into some weird fuckin' shit.
Like, we got Furries cause Disney couldn't stop drawing horny squirrels with tits... so what's this shit going to turn into?
Suppose that does get them around the trademark. Surely clearly depicting it as Elsa from Frozen and relying on the characters almost solely would be an issue though? Either way it sounds like they're on the cusp of being shut down.
Many (unfit, usually low-income) parents use Youtube as a daycare/pacifier for their kids. They give them a tablet and just let them watch for hours on end as it keeps them quiet and the parents can focus on their errands, work, etc. There are certain keywords that parents look for when finding these videos and they happen to be the ones mentioned in OP.
Sure, if you want to take it to the courts. It's not as easy as writing an algorithm for automatically striking down videos with copyrighted songs or gaming footage though, in those cases they can easily prove that the video contains their copyrighted content that they haven't agreed to license to the video uploaders. These are original productions, that's very different.
I'm sure Youtube will get around to striking these videos down eventually like you say though, but not for copyright reasons. They're probably going to create a new policy stating that intentionally making videos that only exist to maximise ad revenue - with content that will not appeal to anyone the advertisers would ever want to target - is exploitative and will lead to demonetization.
What a random assumptionMany (unfit, usually low-income) parents use Youtube as a daycare/pacifier for their kids. They give them a tablet and just let them watch for hours on end as it keeps them quiet and the parents can focus on their errands, work, etc. There are certain keywords that parents look for when finding these videos and they happen to be the ones mentioned in OP.
"Spiderman" isn't trademarked; "Spider-Man" is. "Elsa" is literally a name.
This is the same as nursery rimes or toy videos on youtube with hundreds of millions of views.
Parents just drop their kids on youtube and let autoplay take care of the rest. I know I've been temped to. It's a really easy way to make some time to get things done.
Another guy from work gave me the idea to curate a list of educational shows that we might watch for a few min on the weekends and it's been great.
Inappropriate use of family entertainment characters
The Adventures of Peter Spiderman.
My thing is, why are they doing dirty/sexual jokes etc. like why don't they have Elsa and spiderman going to a cafe and doing other goofy stuff. I don't think the kids are there for the weirdness as much as the characters
GAF is old people when it comes to YouTube.
Ugh, I never want to turn into a "kids these days" kind of old person but these videos are some shit.
My 4 year old daughter watches these. I have no worldly idea why, it baffles me.
Yup, my daughter watches this on repeat. And some channel called Ryan's Toy Review.
I think some of it is weird. At times I get flashes of Running Scared in my head.
I find it so creepy when parents use their kids playing with toys to make money. A lot of them are making bank too. I remember looking up this Disney Toy Review thing, where some Indian woman just opens a toy and plays with it for a few minutes, and they were making a few hundred grand a month.Oh Ryan is the worst. I know hes a little kid but I kind of hate him. Why does he have fifteen Power Wheels?
I wish real Spider-Man had magic boob powers
Can't be any worse than watching Ren and Stimpy or any other insane cartoon like we did as kids.
This is a fetish.
Is this seriously your reaction?GAF is old people when it comes to YouTube.
Many (unfit, usually low-income) parents use Youtube as a daycare/pacifier for their kids. They give them a tablet and just let them watch for hours on end as it keeps them quiet and the parents can focus on their errands, work, etc. There are certain keywords that parents look for when finding these videos and they happen to be the ones mentioned in OP.