I'm trying to figure out why people should be "embarrassed", as some claim, for wanting clarification on what this project would actually entail. If you are asking people to invest their money out of blind faith, be prepared to be disappointed. Most people would like to know what they are supporting.
Also, blame the bad communication for the drama around this. Stating that the Kickstarter funding was being used to determine demand for the game only fostered the idea that Sony was funding a significant portion of development. Not being forthcoming with the actual funding goals created skepticism about the project for some.
People asking legitimate questions have less to be embarrassed about than those attacking them for asking. If we demand companies to be open about the terms of exclusivity when they are vague, shouldn't those concerns be consistently unilateral?
Where and who stated the Kickstarter was to determine demand for the game? $2mill was the trigger to which Sony would contribute sure, and without it it probably wouldn't have got off the ground but they are not one and the same thing.
As to legitimate questions from 'concerned poster's, they aren't legitimate though. From the second the dust settled and the cynics started an echo chamber, I've seen constantly
'Why aren't Sony or any publisher wholly funding this' (a fourteen year old direct sequel to a Dreamcast game that underwhelmed commercially, to which Yu and Boyes have said multiple times multiple publishers have passed on it for over a decade)
'Why is Yu asking the gamers to fund this through Kickstarter' - just because people constantly write on a forum about it doesn't mean jack and Sony wanted a minimum financial line before ponying up money to the pot'
'Why aren't Sony and Yu being 100% transparent about the exact financial breakdown of this' - because business disclosure like this doesn't happen, they are probably still moving targets somewhat and people were asking this not 24 hours after the sodding thing was announced, to which final amounts probably hadn't been formalised because they didn't know if the target would be realised.
'Its a slippery slope' - if people can't identify the context and history of Shenmue and the need of it getting released this way, I don't know what to tell you.
$29 gets you a copy of the title on release digitally. Its just bewildering the constant questions that are negative in tone that have already been answered. People don't want to contribute because they can't see the financial contract between Yu and Sony? Fine. But shitposting over and over again about it is causing a cloud over what otherwise is a positive venture only brought about through the comparatively small base of fans of the game badgering for many years.