• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NPD will no longer release monthly hardware/software unit sales

Boney

Banned
Snuggler said:
I just wanna know the Dead Rising 2 sales numbers, dammit. Has Capcom said anything yet?
Same goes for Metroid: Other M>
no number for you!
S7S06_The_Soup_Nazi.jpg
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
crazygambit said:
You really can't make a game sold for a certain system not work on said system anymore (though working of future versions of the system is quite another matter).
Sure you can. There have already been games on the 360 that required a harddrive even though some models didn't have one.
 
donny2112 said:
And how is this different than what NPD has data for?

Well, first off, NPD is absolutely getting per-store data from at least some retail partners (and is using this in formulating their estimates), but furthermore: who said it was more than NPD was getting? What NPD does to produce their numbers is a ton of work requiring a lot of raw information about the source of the numbers they're working with and a fairly large amount of institutional knowledge. A publisher or hardware company can't easily duplicate that just by placing a few calls to retailers, which is the entire reason NPD can charge for extraordinarily expensive subscriptions in the first place.

Oh, and no, they wouldn't get lump-sum data from Wal-Mart. :p

It's pretty foolish to believe that because NPD specifically doesn't any longer track Wal-Mart data that it's impossible to do so, especially given that a) they used to and b) Wal-Mart participates in SoundScan so they obviously have no innate unwillingness to participate in third-party sales tracking systems.
 

jkanownik

Member
charlequin said:
Well, first off, NPD is absolutely getting per-store data from at least some retail partners (and is using this in formulating their estimates), but furthermore: who said it was more than NPD was getting? What NPD does to produce their numbers is a ton of work requiring a lot of raw information about the source of the numbers they're working with and a fairly large amount of institutional knowledge. A publisher or hardware company can't easily duplicate that just by placing a few calls to retailers, which is the entire reason NPD can charge for extraordinarily expensive subscriptions in the first place.

NPD also has a consumer panel of 1.8MM individuals that they draw data from. They use this panel to accurately size the total market, which allows them to figure out what percentage of the market Walmart represents. Most people aren't aware of this, but NPD clearly calls in out on their web site:

NPD said:
Our sales data, insight on entertainment trends, and industry analysis are based on both point-of-sale (POS) and consumer panel market research.

It greatly increases the validity of their data and is obviously not easily replicated.
 

V_Ben

Banned
jvm said:
If you were going to ask NPD for something specific this month, what would you ask for?

Move sales mostly. Either that, or the numbers Reach did. Both of those would give us something interesting to talk about.
 

Rhindle

Member
Corto said:
Move, Reach and its effects on Xbox 360 overall numbers.
They're very likely to release Reach numbers in their commentary.

I suspect Sony will not want any Move numbers released. :)
 

DMeisterJ

Banned
jvm said:
If you were going to ask NPD for something specific this month, what would you ask for?
Sales of Move Accessories (combination of standalone Move and the bundle) and related software (namely, Sports Champs) considering that we'll definitely get Reach #'s from MS anyway.
 

Phenomic

Member
So we no longer have any good way to determine how good sales wise any games did with a legitimate source? I mean numbers wise at least, even if they rank the games 1-10. Just because a game is number 1 or 2 doesn't mean it sold good at all necessarily at all, just did better then everything else on the list. Sad times I was looking forward to seeing how some of the recent games that came out actually did. Oh wells
 

Pooya

Member
jvm said:
If you were going to ask NPD for something specific this month, what would you ask for?
Kingdom Hearts BbS ranking on individual formats chart or maybe numbers even :\ .
 

ThatObviousUser

ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
20 pages over this?

NPD wasn't that great anyways if you weren't a number fetishist or a fanboy. Just live your life dudes.
 
Andrex said:
20 pages over this?

NPD wasn't that great anyways if you weren't a number fetishist or a fanboy. Just live your life dudes.
Thanks for posting in the unimportant thread on the unimportant topic to let us know your important opinion on this matter.
 

ThatObviousUser

ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
elrechazao said:
Thanks for posting in the unimportant thread on the unimportant topic to let us know your important opinion on this matter.

My pleasure. I'll be here all week.

Also the important numbers are delivered in PR form by the companies in charge anyways.
 

ToxicAdam

Member
Andrex said:
20 pages over this?

NPD wasn't that great anyways if you weren't a number fetishist or a fanboy. Just live your life dudes.


Thank god sales numbers don't determine what type of games we play in the future!

Who gives a shit about dem, amirite?
 

ThatObviousUser

ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
ToxicAdam said:
Thank god sales numbers don't determine what type of games we play in the future!

Who gives a shit about dem, amirite?

Regardless of what the numbers are it's not like we can act on them. It makes no difference if the numbers are released or not, they only really matter to the game companies.
 

Jinfash

needs 2 extra inches
Andrex said:
I can only hope you get help soon.
I really wish you'd stop posting here if you're not interested in NPD threads in the slightest. GAF isn't only about video games, it's also about the industry, so why don't you leave the latter to those who're interested and go:

Andrex said:
live your life dudes.
 

ThatObviousUser

ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
Jinfash said:
I really wish you'd stop posting here if you're not interested in NPD threads in the slightest. GAF isn't only about video games, it's also about the industry, so why don't you leave the latter to those who're interested and go:

Sure thing mang.
 

donny2112

Member
charlequin said:
Well, first off, NPD is absolutely getting per-store data from at least some retail partners

Who?

Edit:
And if they are, what would preclude another company jumping into tracking from getting the same?

The point I was rebuffing was the idea that NPD themselves had tracking stations in individual stores and were, thus, getting more specific data than the retail partner. That does not make any sense based on the anecdotal comments we've heard over the years.

charlequin said:
but furthermore: who said it was more than NPD was getting?

What are you talking about?

charlequin said:
What NPD does to produce their numbers is a ton of work requiring a lot of raw information about the source of the numbers they're working with and a fairly large amount of institutional knowledge.

Duh? They didn't get there overnight. They spent years fine-tuning their formula (which, at times, has been drastically surprising, if not outright wrong), and anyone who came afterwards would start at a similar starting point and work from there. The raw materials would be the same, though.

charlequin said:
A publisher or hardware company can't easily duplicate that just by placing a few calls to retailers,

And the point is? You mean a new company would have to start with the same raw data and work from there? Shocking.

charlequin said:
It's pretty foolish to believe that because NPD specifically doesn't any longer track Wal-Mart data that it's impossible to do so,

Of course not. However if Wal-Mart isn't swayed by NPD to join their panel, what would be the likelihood of jumping in with someone new to the scene?

In short, NPD is not some magic company with an unreproducable, if not unbeatable, method of determining U.S. sales. They're just the only ones doing it publicly, right now. Personally, I'd be surprised if Wal-Mart wasn't reverse-engineering NPD's data to extract the raw values, adding in their own raw values, and extrapolating the other 10% or so of the market from there to get better numbers. If that was happening, though, there's no way they'd let it get outside of their company walls.
 

Boney

Banned
ToxicAdam said:
Thank god sales numbers don't determine what type of games we play in the future!

Who gives a shit about dem, amirite?
In the perfect world, they wouldn't.

btw, leave my hunky poke freak alone.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Neilsen already do gaming trend analysis? The problem with Nielsen is I'm pretty sure their analysis doesn't have anything to do with actual sales numbers but sample sizes of average time spent playing a specific system/game or purchase intent. I always found Neilsen ratings, particularly in other mediums, kind of sketchy personally because they depend so much on random samples and people that volunteer to participate. As far as TV ratings, in the old days they actually had people keep logs of what they watched to come up with ratings. Now they use some sort of set top box if I'm not horribly mistaken. Regardless, their data always seemed dubious to me.

edit: actually Nielsen is considered non-random sampling, which is one its criticisms.
 
If Billboard Magazine, or another entertainment industry trade paper, was on the ball, they'd realize that NPD are handing them a golden opportunity here. These charts are a terrific way to install your publication's brand into the world's consciousness, and up its profile in general. I think Billboard in particular would be good for picking up this mantle, since they know how to report similar retail sales in music, and music sales in retail have slumped so low that those reports are less important and they should be looking to diversify.

But the publishing industry is pretty much doomed for reasons of short-sightedness for a reason, so I can't say I'm too shocked that all these publications are dropping the ball. I'm especially not shocked no one in the N. American video game press has gotten a nationwide sales survey together. Sadly, the video game press has steadily declined into a state of only really being able to produce reviews of mixed quality and rewriting press releases over the years.

I wonder who has better industry reporting these days, the video game industry, or the porn industry?
 
Andrex said:
Regardless of what the numbers are it's not like we can act on them. It makes no difference if the numbers are released or not, they only really matter to the game companies.
You just don't care soooo much.

:lol
 
Top Bottom