Hudsun is releasing a TG16 pack with 3D remakes of Bonk, Adventure Island, and Super Star Soldier for the PS2
plagiarize said:but it was a game FIRST. it's a game ip, that was licensed to be made into a show.
the show fails to reach the audience that the game appeals to... not the other way around. it's not like microsoft or rare paid for the IP. it's their ip to do with what they want.
Fady K said:-Rare is working on a Viva Pinata Kart racing game.
Yet another Rare game im not gonna look forward to.
kenta said:That's what the internet would have you believe, isn't it?
goldenpp72 said:Actually according to rare, they just made the game how they wanted to make it, microsoft didnt go up to them and say 'zomg make kids luv 360'
Microsoft merely tried (and has failed thus far) to take a concept and merchandise it for success.
Kiriku said:What if I we assume someone doesn't like Animal Crossing, or want to play it? Would Animal Crossing be the only way to actually get access to these shirts and accessories then? They might as well release a "Mii clothing" pack for download or something. But I guess this will ensure more money made for them...even though they could just charge money for a download.
king zell said:Wii
Elebits - 7.0 4.0 4.5
Trauma Center - 6.5 7.5 7.0
Rumors
-Sticky Balls - New Katamari for Wii, PS3 and Xbox Live arcade.
-Mii Crossing - Mii's will be your avatar in the next Animal Crossing. All the shirts and accessories you collect will cross over to other games.
-Hudsun is releasing a TG16 pack with 3D remakes of Bonk, Adventure Island, and Super Star Soldier for the PS2.
Amused_To_Death said:Other than Zelda, very average scores for most of the Wii games...
Shawn said:An 8.0 for Resistance?
WTF?!
AltogetherAndrews said:Those scores from Resistance are pretty damned low. Anyone here who has actually played the game extensively agree with an 8.0 for this one?
Ranger X said:"No. This cannot be. AAAAAAAAAAARGH!"
if you also get the reference you're a real gamer
Mifune said:So you haven't even played the game, but you're trying to discredit the opinion of someone who has?
This place should really be renamed Scores-Age.
Ranger X said:"No. This cannot be. AAAAAAAAAAARGH!"
if you also get the reference you're a real gamer
Well I know my tastes well enough to not give in to the hype, but it's kinda like sitting around a pool in a lounge chair watching a bunch of kids get so freaking excited to jump into the pool and swim around to the point where they're dancing in anticipation and screaming to each other about how fun it will be, only to see them all jump in and realize the water was pretty much just like all the other pools they'd already been inMusashi Wins! said:haha, no you didn't.
AltogetherAndrews said:I've played it through twice, and I've also played through certain levels 3-6 times now. I know how I feel about the game, hence why I'm asking if anyone else who has played it extensively agrees with that score.
Mifune said:So you haven't even played the game, but you're trying to discredit the opinion of someone who has?
This place should really be renamed Scores-Age.
Scoot said:That rumor about alternating Gears and Halo franchises is only half true.
There will be one of each in 2008.
AltogetherAndrews said:I've played it through twice, and I've also played through certain levels 3-6 times now. I know how I feel about the game, hence why I'm asking if anyone else who has played it extensively agrees with that score.
Since when is 80% an A? All my schools put that as B-.Pud said:And that's about right. It's not an AAA title, nor is it bad. I'd put it around an A (80% myself).
Took the words right out of my mouth. :lolKevar said:EGM hates Elebits?
*buys*
rage1973 said:Since when is 80% an A? All my schools put that as B-.
Scoot said:When he wrote his review, Shane had played 53 hours of the game. We've been making fun of Shane's SLOW speed through Zelda on 1UP Yours -- both he and Greg Ford play Zelda excruciatingly sloth-like. That's more likely what you are thinking of.
White Man said:That Rainbow 6 score is criminal. The game takes a massive dump on Gears of War. And the Zelda score is too high, although I guess it needs to score higher than WW, and tehre was nowhere else to go but straight 10s. Of course that proves nothing except that WW was massively overrated.
kenta said:Surprisingly low Wii scores, Zelda aside. Honestly pretty startling.
Soul4ger said:There are plenty of FPS games that do what they set out to doand they do it well. Considering all the new entries in the genre, all the time, maybe it's time to start looking for them to do stuff DIFFERENTLY, not just WELL? Or maybe my expectations are unrealistic or too high, to expect creativity? Are we supposed to give Resistance a pass on whatever it DOESN'T do, just BECAUSE it's a launch game? Besides, an 8.0 translates to "Great" anyway. What difference does it make?
Amir0x said:Certainly not! It's just a terrible videogame, and I don't like things which are terrible!
VALIS said:As someone who owns every Wii game except Red Steel, those scores are high if anything. Raving Rabbids is like a 5.0 game. TH Downhill is another piece of junk.
AltogetherAndrews said:Resistance adds more to the genre than just about any other shooter of 2006 due to an arsenal that is certainly uniquely creative to the genre at this point. It does a bunch of different stuff, throws it into an FPS highlight reel with great production values all around. Though technically I don't have a problem with reviewers criticizing it for doing nothing new (although as mentioned above, I'd contest that notion in the first place), somehow I doubt this line of criticism will be applied across the board. I guess we'll see when the next big time shooter comes out that sacrifices fundamental originality in favor of delivering a highly polished FPS based on existing standards.
Karma Kramer said:I agree and thats why Resistence scored better than any other FPS.
Amir0x said:Certainly not! It's just a terrible videogame, and I don't like things which are terrible!