As much as I like Jeopardy, they really need to up the prize money. It's been the same since I began watching the show.
It's not really about the money, though. In the UK, most long-established game shows are more about the *game* than the rewards, particularly the ones regarded as tough.
Mastermind awards a trophy.
Fifteen-to-one awarded a bit of historical pottery.
Only Connect, another trophy.
Brain of Britain, trophy.
Even the friendly teatime quizzes don't generally break the bank:
Countdown awards a teapot, or a copy of the full OED for the winner of the season.
Pointless awards The Pointless Trophy, only winning a jackpot (of £1000, rolling over each time it's unwon) if you win the rather difficult endgame.
Admittedly, part of that is due to the fact that there was legislation forbidding tv companies from giving away huge cash prizes until relatively recently; in 1990, prizes were capped at £6,000, meaning our version of The $64,000 Question only gave away £6,400, and that was by getting special permission. Indeed, I think the creation of WWTBAM was largely due to that cap being removed in the late nineties.
I quite like the fact that one of the best-known US game shows isn't really all about the moolah.
he's probably the best gameshow host of all time. thread title made my heart skip a beat.
In the US, perhaps. In the UK, I'd go for Bob Holness or William G. Stewart for authoritarian-but-friendly-style hosting and Bob Monkhouse or Bruce Forsyth (Brucie, which always made me do a double-take in GTA4!) for the more avuncular-style.