|
|
Banned
(11-19-2008,
08:37 PM)
|
Gran Turismo 5 in 3840 x 2160 resolution.
#1
http://www.gran-turismo.com/en/sp/d2788.html
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Lock if old? |
|
Post Count: 9999
(11-19-2008,
08:42 PM)
|
#10
Originally Posted by Piper Az:
Knowing Polyphony, they'll throw it in as an option. Previous GT's have had the option to link multiple PS2's so you can have 3 screens. |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:42 PM)
|
#12
Originally Posted by Wollan:
![]() Oh fuck. I know it pegs me as a horrible geek but that is easily the best laugh I had today. Anyway, this is amazing. We actually have a similar ultra-high resolution projection setup at work (though it's tiled), but it's only used for "boring" stuff like astrophysics visualization and medical imaging. It's really amazing when you can walk up to a huge projected screen and still discern more and more detail. Last edited by Durante : 11-19-2008 at 08:46 PM. |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:46 PM)
|
#16
I want a native res direct-feed video of this yesterday.
12GB .mkv file - 20 seconds playtime edit: and stop bitching about the release date, guys. |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:49 PM)
|
#19
If every PS3 is producing a quarter of the picture, don't you actually need 4 images per 0.1 sec to get one full image?
fps doesn't add magically, that's pretty bad math right there the second part of the graph should show stacking of frame and not a simple addition... edit: oops didn't saw that the OP didn't post the second part of the article; my bad sorry. Last edited by MistakenMobius : 11-19-2008 at 08:55 PM. |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:49 PM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by Dante:
|
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:51 PM)
|
#24
Originally Posted by Goldrusher:
Doesn't it do 60fps when it merges the images? |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:51 PM)
|
#25
So now, if screenshots with insane AA are released for GT5, they aren't bullshots but just 4 PS3 shots!
|
|
Banned
(11-19-2008,
08:52 PM)
|
#26
http://www.gran-turismo.com/en/sp/d2788ip18a_jpg.html
"The 19 inch nano-Spindt FED (Prototype) was placed on display especially for this event. The monitor is able to display 240 frames per second, providing an experience very close to real life." Like Woah. |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:53 PM)
|
#32
Originally Posted by Wollan:
Originally Posted by Kaako:
|
|
(11-19-2008,
08:55 PM)
|
#36
Wow? WOW.
|
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:55 PM)
|
#38
Originally Posted by Kagari:
Well I spoke to Jeff Rubenstein at the R2 event, and he said that They are not going to announce or show anything 09 related until after the holiday....Which makes sense, but is frustrating as a fan awaiting these announcements. |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:56 PM)
|
#41
Originally Posted by XiaNaphryz:
... I need to go and get some tissues now. |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:56 PM)
|
#42
Originally Posted by DigitalSoul:
16 PS3's put together become self aware for the first time ever. First Thought: "Why is this monkey forcing me to work hard simulating driving a car? Doesn't he like own a real car somewhere?" Second Thought: "Wow... These nuclear launch codes aren't encrypted very well." |
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(11-19-2008,
08:57 PM)
|
#44
I think the 240fps was a seperate demonstration..at 1080p. I think one demo was about merging framebuffer outputs to produce that ultra-high resolution, and the other was about staggering frame rendering and stuff for higher fps.
The slides make it look that way anyway. I don't think it was 3840 x 2160 @ 240fps. I wonder if this will be an option in the game Or if this is Polyphony's early prep for a PS4 that's basically 4 seperate PS3s duct-taped together...kidding..i think.. |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:57 PM)
|
#45
Yawn, while the console fanboys argue over whether its true 2160p or upscaled from 1860p, PC owners will be playing full 10240x3072 res games.
http://www.plastk.net/highres/24mon/ 10240x3072 quake 3 |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:57 PM)
|
#46
Originally Posted by Dante:
:( |
|
(11-19-2008,
08:58 PM)
|
#47
Originally Posted by Doc Evils:
Originally Posted by poppabk:
Their 50 monitor setup is ridiculous. ![]() |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:58 PM)
|
#48
I love the 3840x2160 resolution... For a normal eye, the maximal viewing distance at this resolution to be able to see details is... around half the diagonal of the screen
So even if you put you eye 5cm to the screen, you still won't be able to see details in the corners... So useful ^_^ |
|
Member
(11-19-2008,
08:59 PM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by poppabk:
And your contribution to this thread is to mock people? Neat. I wish everyone would only post to mock someone. Helpful cand nice ommunity posters should be banned 4 life. |