We have to wait and see, it is a 4 hour game though.
Even when it seems like Activision might care, they still don't really care.
We have to wait and see, it is a 4 hour game though.
Haha, I have never seen so much negativity on GAF in response to the idea that people should be more skeptical of previews--especially ones posted on Sony's PlayStation Blog--making video games sound good! Reading this and realizing that it could've been posted on any gaming site is strange and kinda scary to me, as someone who cares a great deal about video game writing and reporting. Given how often people on this site complain about video game journalism, I imagined most GAFfers would agree. Video game sites need to evolve or they'll just be replaced by corporate blogs like this, which will be very bad news for anyone who likes gaming.
To be fair it is $15.Even when it seems like Activision might care, they still don't really care.
Oh, and you totally can summon an air ball and ride it around just like in the show.
Even when it seems like Activision might care, they still don't really care.
Only four hours long? So really only about 2-3hrs for the more veteran gamer.
That's pretty disappointing, hope there's a ton of replay value.
off topic, I know. But I would like to know what your opinion on the e3 treehouse coverage is then?Haha, I have never seen so much negativity on GAF in response to the idea that people should be more skeptical of previews--especially ones posted on Sony's PlayStation Blog--making video games sound good! Reading this and realizing that it could've been posted on any gaming site is strange and kinda scary to me, as someone who cares a great deal about video game writing and reporting. Given how often people on this site complain about video game journalism, I imagined most GAFfers would agree. Video game sites need to evolve or they'll just be replaced by corporate blogs like this, which will be very bad news for anyone who likes gaming.
Yes Jason. Video game sites must report on airplanes that look like vegetables and weird exercises.
For that is the future of video game sites.
I think you're way off base on this one Jason. People don't go to the Playstation Blog to get opinions on what to buy, they go for information about games. If you compare the PS Blog to Kotaku (since you've invited the comparison) I think one could easily argue that PS Blog has a much higher signal to noise ratio. (That's putting it as nicely as I can and I say that as someone who generally likes your work).Haha, I have never seen so much negativity on GAF in response to the idea that people should be more skeptical of previews--especially ones posted on Sony's PlayStation Blog--making video games sound good! Reading this and realizing that it could've been posted on any gaming site is strange and kinda scary to me, as someone who cares a great deal about video game writing and reporting. Given how often people on this site complain about video game journalism, I imagined most GAFfers would agree. Video game sites need to evolve or they'll just be replaced by corporate blogs like this, which will be very bad news for anyone who likes gaming.
Rising was the same length and that had tons of fun to it, and it was 4x more expensive.
Why is nobody asking the real question, "Will Korra have a nice rack and booty?"
Complaining about Kotaku East -- a subsite of Kotaku that covers Asian culture and has run every weekday from 4am-8am for over two years now -- is even more boring than previews. If you don't like that stuff, don't read the site then. Read it during regular daytime hours, or just read whatever articles pop up on NeoGAF or other aggregators. I really don't mind. I certainly don't read or care about everything on Kotaku East.Yes Jason. Video game sites must report on airplanes that look like vegetables and weird exercises.
For that is the future of video game sites.
I think it is brilliant, not just because it's fun for Nintendo fans to feel like they're at E3, but because it showcases the people who work there, not just the games. As more companies take after Nintendo and do things like stream their E3 coverage, game sites will have to adapt accordingly.off topic, I know. But I would like to know what your opinion on the e3 treehouse coverage is then?
You don't need an answer for a fact.
It's a shame future threads about this game are going to get bogged down by people bitching about the perceived quality of the show. :/
Complaining about Kotaku East -- a subsite of Kotaku that covers Asian culture and has run every weekday from 4am-8am for over two years now -- is even more boring than previews. If you don't like that stuff, don't read the site then. Read it during regular daytime hours, or just read whatever articles pop up on NeoGAF or other aggregators. I really don't mind. I certainly don't read or care about everything on Kotaku East.
I think it is brilliant, not just because it's fun for Nintendo fans to feel like they're at E3, but because it showcases the people who work there, not just the games. As more companies take after Nintendo and do things like stream their E3 coverage, game sites will have to adapt accordingly.
By children yes
It's inevitable and should be expected as it's a bad show. However, I'm sure mods will keep the threads/OT on track in light of derailment.
It's a shame future threads about this game are going to get bogged down by people bitching about the perceived quality of the show. :/
Ask yourselves: would the PlayStation Blog make a PlayStation game sound bad?
You must be new to the internet.
Hell, Metal Gear Rising which is also by platinum was sold for $60 and is like 5-6 hours long (and something like 4,5 hours if you don't consider the cutscenes)
Here was my train of thought:And again, what is your qualm with a clearly marked PS Blog post, then? Surely it should have been included in the thread title, but given that it's obvious as soon as someone clicks the thread, what precisely is the large issue here?
Was it the assumption that people somehow don't know that the PS Blog won't write a scathing preview? Were you implying that the game is actually not good?
The puzzling thing here is that your initial post is divorced from what seems to be your general point regarding previews.
Complaining about Kotaku East -- a subsite of Kotaku that covers Asian culture and has run every weekday from 4am-8am for over two years now -- is even more boring than previews. If you don't like that stuff, don't read the site then. Read it during regular daytime hours, or just read whatever articles pop up on NeoGAF or other aggregators. I really don't mind. I certainly don't read or care about everything on Kotaku East.
Rising was the same length and that had tons of fun to it, and it was 4x more expensive.
Yes what we need is less information about games before they come out!
Then I fail to see what you problem with preview culture in this case is. Nintendo's main goal was to promote the content for their own platforms while cutting out the media as a middle man.I think it is brilliant, not just because it's fun for Nintendo fans to feel like they're at E3, but because it showcases the people who work there, not just the games. As more companies take after Nintendo and do things like stream their E3 coverage, game sites will have to adapt accordingly.
It's a shame future threads about this game are going to get bogged down by people bitching about the perceived quality of the show. :/
By children yes
The in-game timer (which doesn't count cutscenes or Codecs or reloaded checkpoints or deaths, as far as I know) said 8 hours on my first time through Revengeance, and I've since played that game for well over fifty hours without even getting all the achievements. Four hours in Platinum Time must be worth at least twenty real hours
And thats the problem with your site, there is so much god damn filler in it. The fact you are telling me to visit your site during certain times is more troubling than a preview on ps blog.
Not to mention this whole thing began because of your snarky insinuation that the game was bad, and PS blog isn't accurately reflecting on the quality of the game.
This then moves on to "previews are boring" but your site never had any problems with previews before. Why are they suddenly boring? They give insight to a game we as the general consumer do not have the opportunity to try in advance, rather than waiting for an embargoed review.
Not to mention you indulge in leaking games, posting unfinished screenshots of games plastered with your watermarks on the side.
Previews are more valuable than the leaks you pride yourself with as we have an idea of a complete game, rather than a picture of something that is clearly unfinished.
One possible solution: get out of preview culture entirely. Let Nintendo and the PlayStation Blog be the hypemen and women. Spend more time covering real stories and games that are already out, rather than the dripfeed of press releases and PR-approved info that this industry loves so much.Then I fail to see what you problem with preview culture in this case is. Nintendo's main goal was to promote the content for their own platforms while cutting out the media as a middle man.
They did it in a very entertaining and informative way, I agree.
And in which way should the media outlets adapt?
Here was my train of thought:
- Wow, people are reading this as if it's a preview on any game site, even though it was written by a PlayStation employee.
- Wow, this really does read like it could be a preview on any game site. Scary!
- If the PlayStation Blog is covering games in the same way as any game site would, something is seriously wrong with preview culture, and we need to figure out how to change that, rather than let inertia take over, and watch game sites go obsolete.
I have no idea whether the game is good or not, nor will anybody until they actually play it. But this typical PR cycle is feeling more gross and less relevant every day.
Hope that helps.
Here was my train of thought:
- Wow, people are reading this as if it's a preview on any game site, even though it was written by a PlayStation employee.
- Wow, this really does read like it could be a preview on any game site. Scary!
- If the PlayStation Blog is covering games in the same way as any game site would, something is seriously wrong with preview culture, and we need to figure out how to change that, rather than let inertia take over, and watch game sites go obsolete.
I have no idea whether the game is good or not, nor will anybody until they actually play it. But this typical PR cycle is feeling more gross and less relevant every day.
Hope that helps.
Sounds likeOne possible solution: get out of preview culture entirely. Let Nintendo and the PlayStation Blog be the hypemen and women. Spend more time covering real stories and games that are already out, rather than the dripfeed of press releases and PR-approved info that this industry loves so much.
Previews are boring and increasingly useless to readers, and this is testament to that. If a preview written on a game company's blog reads just like a preview written on a game site, something's horribly wrong in the way game sites are approaching their coverage, don't you think? Maybe we need to take a long hard look at preview culture and think about who it's really serving.
I think we're missing the most important part of this new information
it could be 2 hours long as long as it has plenty of replay value. Multiple difficulty levels, unlockables, challenge maps with leaderboards, etc.
Here was my train of thought:
- Wow, people are reading this as if it's a preview on any game site, even though it was written by a PlayStation employee.
- Wow, this really does read like it could be a preview on any game site. Scary!
- If the PlayStation Blog is covering games in the same way as any game site would, something is seriously wrong with preview culture, and we need to figure out how to change that, rather than let inertia take over, and watch game sites go obsolete.
I have no idea whether the game is good or not, nor will anybody until they actually play it. But this typical PR cycle is feeling more gross and less relevant every day.
Hope that helps.
Hehe yeah it is pretty awesome to get random surprises like this.
Sorry, I didn't mean to derail your thread. I'll stop responding about this here -- someone's welcome to make a new thread if they want to talk more about previews in general, and I'll respond as I have time.Look all I did was make a topic about something that pop up in my feed, its no nefarious means behind it. :/
Of course there is something wrong with preview culture, you want something to change about that? 2 huge things you have to go to marketing teams and tell them they have killed their own job. Most people will never admit they are wrong that is something difficult to push through and how this industry and it's consumers are I feel they will just roll over from it rather than look to solutions.Something is seriously wrong with preview culture, and we need to figure out how to change that, rather than let inertia take over, and watch game sites go obsolete.