Not widely known, but they also helped make Battlefield 3: End Game and heavily assisted with Battlefield 4.
Your telling me DICE had help and still didnt ship a finished and stable game.
Not widely known, but they also helped make Battlefield 3: End Game and heavily assisted with Battlefield 4.
Is that a god damn flip phone on the table?
Or the decoy you hand to visceral while your Note 3 is tucked away in your anal cavity.Or a cheap phone if you're international press.
Am I allowed to whistle and rock back and forth on my feet all innocent like on this one?
Dead Space 4?
Dead Space F2P action 3rd person shooter loaded with micro-transactions ? Hmmm... oh wait they already did that :d
This isn't Battlefield. Visceral has not ever released a Battlefield game, nor an FPS since that 007: Agent Under Fire game. Does no one remember Amy Hennig joining them just a few months ago to work on an unannounced Star Wars project? The sites that reported Battlefield: SWAT aren't reputable, and there's no evidence for it. That's all coming from places with no real track record. The only place that has integrity to their reports is Polygon, and all that was said was contractors could work on a "rumored police-themed Battlefield title" by Visceral, said a source. So, how in the world did the news then jump to Battlefield: SWAT as a confirmed thing without a soul in the media picking it up?
TL;DR: It's Star Wars related, not Battlefield.
Is that a god damn flip phone on the table?
It makes no financial sense whatsoever to have a team that has not ever built an FPS on the scale of Battlefield take the reins on one of your flagship series'. .
The developers have though they almost all worked on Battlefield 4. Read the link he posted.
The Star Wars title is >than a year old, and is open world.
Do you honesty think that they had gameplay ready and opted to show that instead of say Battlefront to the press before E3?
Clearly whatever game they showed is releasing soon and they want to give the previewers time to write pieces so they're ready immediately after it's revealed at E3.
Or the decoy you hand to visceral while your Note 3 is tucked away in your anal cavity.
Does this mean Monkey Pants is returning to GAF.
I miss you, Monkey Pants and Codecow
I've been playing BF4 nonstop since launch. I think the game was in playable shape a month or two after launch but most of the servers were garbage up until quite recently.Your telling me DICE had help and still didnt ship a finished and stable game.
1. Battlefront is a DICE game, not Visceral. Not sure if you meant Battlefield there.
2. Yes, it is more than a year old. Meaning, they could very well have something put together.
3. If it was releasing soon like you said, why was it not shown at Judges' Week last week? I think EA would love to have their new Battlefield game put into consideration for that. Further more, if it is coming to Game Informer, it is likely not releasing this year.
Sw Visceral went into pre-development late spring of last year. Considering Visceral is still hiring major people I don't think it's safe to even say it's went into Full development yet. It's very very unlikely that SW Visceral was shown at the presser. I mean come on they just brought on a new writer and creative directer in April. If the game was far enough along to have fully polished E3 tier gameplay segment why would they need a new writer or Creative directer? You also don't hold a press even for a CG trailer right before E3. Gameplay was shown.
It being at Judges week is irrelevant. 1 we don't know that it wasn't there. 2 even if it wasn't there, actually going to judges week (as said in the other thread) doesn't matter. I could lobby the same thing back as well, if this was Visceral Star Wars why wasn't it at Judges week? Game informer hosts covers to games all the time near release. I don't see how it having a cover proves anything. COD 11 just had a cover and it's still releasing in the Fall.
3. If it was releasing soon like you said, why was it not shown at Judges' Week last week? I think EA would love to have their new Battlefield game put into consideration for that. Further more, if it is coming to Game Informer, it is likely not releasing this year.
*Opens door, sticks head in, nods, closes door*
You're assuming that you know when they went into pre-development. You're right, gameplay had to be shown for an event like this before E3. You're also correct in that it could have been at Judges Week or that another project could of been.
All of that is exactly my point. Everyone buckling down for "Battlefield: SWAT" is just as much a rumor as anything else. There's NO confirmed name, much less any other real evidence that it exists. Everything being concluded is based on stuff that is being spun to argue the point, when you could do the same for any number of things.
So, I'm not saying that a new Battlefield is impossible, but giving it a name and talking about it like it is a confirmed real game is just silly. It could be anything. And personally, I'd rather see the new Star Wars title at E3. So I'll hold out for that, and eat crow if I'm wrong and it's some new Battlefield.
Side Note: About the GI cover story: It's the norm that most games are published as a cover at least 8 months or so ahead of time. Call of Duty is a bad example because they are already annualized and expected each year. If this was releasing this year (before Christmas), it would likely have been a cover earlier. Not saying it's impossible, just saying the odds aren't for it.
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ea...ch-did-not-damage-the-franchise/1100-6418131/GameSpot said:Finally, Jorgensen said Battlefield will be a "key" franchise for EA going forward and teased that the franchise will be "critical" to EA's fiscal year 2015, which begins next month. A Battlefield game for 2014 has not been announced, though a police-themed entry in the series from Visceral Games is rumored to launch this year.
B]The report later states that Wedbush "spoke with [EA] management on Thursday afternoon, and although they have not yet announced a version of Battlefield for FY:15, they confirmed that our understanding is spot on and that if a version of Battlefield were to be released in FY:15, it would be developed by a studio other than DICE."[/B]
Videogamer
why does everyone think its a battlefield game, arent they working on a new star wars game....did I miss something
We've always had multiple irons in the fire, always will. We typically have one game that's currently the "big production", one game with a small-ish pre-production team (about 20 people), and one or more that's in very early stages.
None of the things we're doing now have been announced officially, so I can't comment other than to say we're always doing more than one thing.
D E A D S P 4 C E
Well, we can take it straight from the horse's mouth:
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ea...ch-did-not-damage-the-franchise/1100-6418131/
I'm pretty sure they're not intending for 2 of 5 DLC packs to be a critical park of their fiscal year.
Also:
Maybe it's something interesting, so weird why the game industry of all things is so secretive.
Claiming bf4 is broken is so old. Thee game is fine and quite good. Newer improvements will only make it better.
Maybe it's something interesting, so weird why the game industry of all things is so secretive.
Not only are these events annoying for the reasons you cited, they put journalists in terrible positions when stuff leaks out that they've seen under NDA. Press were briefed on Borderlands Pre-Sequel news, for example, and it leaked out two days before the embargo. Our options were either A) ignore the leak; B) violate an agreement we signed; or C) report the leak without acknowledging that we knew it was real. None of those options are ideal.I agree with this. They have these events that spur rumors, arguments, and speculation over games just to get the media prepared for the announcement. It's unfair to the journalists because you're essentially robbing them of being able to react to the game for the first time with the announcement.
Also, it kills our hype as gamers because when it gets announced, we all say, "Yep. New Battlefield. Great. What we expected."
If it's going to be an awesome game, put the announcement out there and let people go apeshit.
It doesn't need to be at Judges' Week.
The initial press reveal has no bearing on when a game will be ready to ship. A game doesn't need to be revealed to the press X months prior to be released.
Not only are these events annoying for the reasons you cited, they put journalists in terrible positions when stuff leaks out that they've seen under NDA. Press were briefed on Borderlands Pre-Sequel news, for example, and it leaked out two days before the embargo. Our options were either A) ignore the leak; B) violate an agreement we signed; or C) report the leak without acknowledging that we knew it was real. None of those options are ideal.
I've been pushing hard for us to just skip all these events entirely. They're really not that useful to readers.
TAKE AWAY THEIR PHONES
WE MUST HIDE THE SLIGHT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AND LAST YEARS SHOOTBANGS