That doesn't look quite hot considering they're charging $60 for this once again. Oh well.
That doesn't look quite hot considering they're charging $60 for this once again. Oh well.
That doesn't look quite hot considering they're charging $60 for this once again. Oh well.
That doesn't look quite hot considering they're charging $60 for this once again. Oh well.
tbh this thread is great. I have a feeling so much crow is going to be served up once photomode is unleashed.
tbh this thread is great. I have a feeling so much crow is going to be served up once photomode is unleashed.
i wanted it in 4K..Looks like the last of us in 1080p. Just what I always wanted!
wut. I mean, I could link you a hundred screenshots from Infamous:SS, but just look at this.These screenshots don't look very attractive, but it's a case like inFamous, I'm imagining, where I'm basically thinking how bleh the screenshots looked but then in-game the game looks effing amazing.
Regardless, I'm still getting this so I can play the multiplayer with my buddies on party chat instead of randoms on PS3.
Looks like the last of us in 1080p. Just what I always wanted!
That's exactly what it looks like, and that's all they promised. Did people really expect Infamous visuals?
wut. I mean, I could link you a hundred screenshots from Infamous:SS, but just look at this.
On the other hand I do understand that some people claim the full price, which is especially for PS3 owners a hit in their face. And to offer no upgrade model is a bad move from Sony, considering the loyalty of the gamers. But also for new Playstation owners who have not owned a PS3 or at least TLOU (PS3) it doesn't justifies full pricing, because it's no new game and "just" revamped.
Just my 2 cents and have a good start into the week, guys!
I'm referring to the compressed share screenshots, not direct capture.wut. I mean, I could link you a hundred screenshots from Infamous:SS, but just look at this.
This is bleh?
Are u serious comparing a completely new PS4 game from the scratch with a revamped PS3 game?
You guys should realize those screens are 200kb, a 1080p JPG should be about 1-2.5mb
png/bmp is the best for screenshots
Then I have to apologize! I obviously completely lost the context. ^..no? I wasn't at all. I was questioning why this guy thought Infamous:SS looked "blah".
I'm referring to the compressed share screenshots, not direct capture.
It happens. I honestly think TLOU PS4 looks phenomenal for a port. I just assumed we'd get an up-res and nothing else... looks like they used better textures and lighting, which is a welcome addition. Makes the world feel more aliveThen I have to apologize! I obviously completely lost the context. ^
That doesn't look quite hot considering they're charging $60 for this once again. Oh well.
TBH, that's always kind of the case with share feature screens. Anytime I see the screens I've made of Trine 2, KZ:SF and Infamous, they always look somehow crappy compared to what the actual game looked like when I played it. JPG puts them through a blur filter, and even worse it looks like the colours are always sightly messed up / washed out compared to the actual game play. 200K JPG quality is just not enough for this resolution.
It makes you wonder if Sony is happy with this less than accurate image sharing solution as it seem a bad promotional tool too.
I somehow agree with both discussion parties in this topic.
On one hand the PS3 version looked already unbelievable and close to Nexgen but also the PS4 is another huge step forward looking even better than the PS3 version. If someone doesn't see the increased textures and sharpness (due to 1080p) I recommend to consult an eye specialist or stop trolling.
On the other hand I do understand that some people claim the full price, which is especially for PS3 owners a hit in their face. And to offer no upgrade model is a bad move from Sony, considering the loyalty of the gamers. But also for new Playstation owners who have not owned a PS3 or at least TLOU (PS3) it doesn't justifies full pricing, because it's no new game and "just" revamped.
Just my 2 cents and have a good start into the week, guys!
I thought it would look better tbh. maybe it's better in motion.
tbh this thread is great. I have a feeling so much crow is going to be served up once photomode
2 things I disagree with in your post.
First, why should they offer an upgrade model? The game is over a year old. They offered upgrades for games like AC IV and COD just because the new consoles were releasing a month later. What reason do you have to justify that you need an upgrade for a purchase you made a year ago?
Just bought Metro Last Light Redux using 50% discount because I own regular edition released 1 year ago and just bought Metro 2033 Redux using 50% discount because I own regular edition released 4 years ago.
Ok? that doesn't mean everyone has to offer discounts. Were there discounts for shadow of the colossus on the ps3 just because you had it on ps2? Or MGS3 just because you had it on ps2? People are only talking about upgrades just because they did it with the releases last october.
Ok? that doesn't mean everyone has to offer discounts. Were there discounts for shadow of the colossus on the ps3 just because you had it on ps2? Or MGS3 just because you had it on ps2? People are only talking about upgrades just because they did it with the releases last october.
Companies have the right to not offer discounts at their discretion.
Buyers have the right to demand best purchase options they've seen in other companies.
You ask "why do they have to do discounts"? The answer is, "why not if others can do it"?
I understand that a company does not want to. But I don't understand that you have to defend it.
Didn't they release MGS3 twice on ps2? I want my money!
Ok? that doesn't mean everyone has to offer discounts. Were there discounts for shadow of the colossus on the ps3 just because you had it on ps2?
Or MGS3 just because you had it on ps2?
Companies have the right to not offer discounts at their discretion.
Buyers have the right to demand best purchase options they've seen in other companies.
You ask "why do they have to do discounts"? The answer is, "why not if others can do it"?
I understand that a company does not want to. But I don't understand that you have to defend it.
tbh this thread is great. I have a feeling so much crow is going to be served up once photomode is unleashed.
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.
Came in to see the screens. See post of Infamous shot and a guy saying TLOU is 60 dollars.
Abe-simpson-walking.gif
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.
Great... photo mode. That's what we need, another way to make games much better than they actually do.
The idea here is to take a proper, uncompressed screenshot. Photo Mode makes over hyped bullshots look honest.