Forerunner
Member
Typical DICE
An announcement for an announcement.
An announcement for an announcement.
Ha, yep. I remember this from last time. Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Gemüsepizza;202197767 said:Initially, because it's a strong IP. But the game was received poorly, and servers on PC are already a wasteland.
At least this would confirm a time-period.I hope.
First time i have seen anyone bemoan optional choice for server set up. I am pretty sure people, and especially pc gamers, view that as necessary basically for server-based multi.
There's no way to properly filter out the custom game settings for Battlefield, at least in the console server browser, so you get put on maps with absolutely ludicrous ticket counts and 64 players on any game type and mode that supports it even when it's not balanced or fun. Everyone just maxes out numbers instead of putting thought into the server settings. It's a real pain to be playing for over two hours on a single game of Conquest.
So we will be getting a teaser video today?
You should be able to, you could on 4.
You had to type in the word DICE as a server option to only get official non custom servers.
Sounds good if it's WW1. I'm the weirdo that likes playing COD and BF campaigns and not the multiplayer.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=202208055&postcount=1594
"NDA lifted" = YouTubers posting 5+ minute videos saying absolutely nothing except that the reveal will be on May 6th.
I got honeydicked hard.... :'(
Battlefront is Frostbite, so yeahShould we expect this game to run on the Battlefront engine as well?
Should we expect this game to run on the Battlefront engine as well?
If this is set in the future I'm cutting my dick off.
If this is set in the future I'm cutting my dick off.
If this is set in the future I'm cutting my dick off.
Time is a circle.Looks like you get to keep it.