• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Woman Admits Testimony In The Murder of Emmet Till Was Made Up

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kal_El

Member
I didn't expect myself to feel this angry before I entered this thread but thinking about this fucking lady living 60+ years and just saying oh I made that up. No justice being tortured and killed. He was like 13. Think about him being beat and dragged. Think about it. Right now.
 

Steejee

Member
I didn't expect myself to feel this angry before I entered this thread but thinking about this fucking lady living 60+ years and just saying oh I made that up. No justice being tortured and killed. He was like 13. Think about him being beat and dragged. Think about it. Right now.

Agreed. Completely unforgivable.
 
You could argue she didn't knew what would happen because of her lie.

Between 1882-1968, Mississippi saw more lynchings than any other state in the union. People showed up to them like they were parties. People knew they were often fueled by nothing more than a rumor. Carolyn was 21 when she encountered Till.

I guess you could make the argument that she didn't know what would happen if she started a vicious rumor about an innocent black man. But then again you could make any number of stupid fucking arguments like the earth is flat or there's a teapot between the earth and mars.
 

Lowmelody

Member
Why would anyone argue this?
You know you don't have to try and excuse everything shitty thing where race is a factor.

For real. FFS

There is a group of posters here that will down play, water down, deflect or play devils advocate on behalf of basically any injustice no matter how small or big.
 

LotusHD

Banned
For real. FFS

There is a group of posters here that will down play, water down, deflect or play devils advocate on behalf of basically any injustice no matter how small or big.

Defending punching Nazis, tackling protesters, and now I guess this is the next weird hill to die on.
 

Enzom21

Member
For real. FFS

There is a group of posters here that will down play, water down, deflect or play devils advocate on behalf of basically any injustice no matter how small or big.
Shit is transparent. Par for course for dave is ok though.
This was the mid 1950s. It wasn't as commonplace as it had been decades prior


Child. Not man.

I'm not defending her actions guys. Pick a new dogpile target.

What planet do you live on?
You attempted to excuse her actions because maybe... possibly she didn't know.
People having issue with your ridiculous post more than likely know your M.O. in threads involving race/racism.
 

dave is ok

aztek is ok
In 1950s Mississippi? C'mon son.

You need to reread history
Mississippi is Mississippi, but by the late 40s and early 50s people were getting arrested and getting convicted in lynching cases.

You attempted to excuse her actions because maybe... possibly she didn't know.
Point out where I said that, even in the first post I made I argued that she should have known how her husband would react.
 

Skilletor

Member
This was the mid 1950s. It wasn't as commonplace as it had been decades prior


Child. Not man.

I'm not defending her actions guys. Pick a new dogpile target.

Mississippi, after all, had had very few convictions for white-on-black murders. And the state led the nation in lynchings. (Four months after their irreversible acquittal, Milam and Bryant admitted their guilt to Look magazine, receiving a fee of some $3,000 for their story.

Not only was it commonplace, they fucking got paid for murdering a black child.
 

Wolfe

Member
This was the mid 1950s. It wasn't as commonplace as it had been decades prior


Child. Not man.

I'm not defending her actions guys. Pick a new dogpile target.

You brought this on yourself dude.

Also lol at your first comment, that shit is still basically commonplace today, just in a different form.
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
Trying to right with God, probably. No pass. Enjoy that hellfire.

Unfortunately not how the universe works. Which is why justice needs to happen in this life.

That's why we need a fair justice system. Outwitness testimony should not be considered evidence generally.
 

Enzom21

Member
Yeah, I mean. Shit. Look at this post from 2008

I've been spreading hatred on GAF for a decade.

Or maybe - any opinion that slightly deviates from "Burn in hell" is frowned upon these days and people should learn a little critical thinking.

Congratulations, you know killing black people is bad.
As I said earlier, you don't have always try to excuse white people and the bad things they do.
It's okay to admit a white woman did a bad thing,
 
Hopefully this foul woman stays hidden cause I have zero interest in any kind of apology tour or televised spectacles involving the Till family being asked to forgive this creature.
 

dave is ok

aztek is ok
Congratulations, you know killing black people is bad.
As I said earlier, you don't have always try to excuse white people and the bad things they do. It's okay to admit a white woman did a bad thing,
I never said she didn't do a bad thing, I said she might not have the foresight to know what would happen as a result of her bad thing - which I don't think is very controversial and we have no way of asking her. All we have is second hand information from interviews.
Hopefully this foul woman stays hidden cause I have zero interest in any kind of apology tour or televised spectacles involving the Till family being asked to forgive this creature.
She is dead.
 
I never said she didn't do a bad thing, I said she might not have the foresight to know what would happen as a result of her bad thing - which I don't think is very controversial and we have no way of asking her. All we have is second hand information from interviews.

Dude, what the fuck is the point of your argument? Like why are you making it?
 
That is utterly horrific. I hope she was tormented her whole life knowing what she did. She should spend the rest of her life in prison.
 

Glix

Member
Maybe a few years ago I would have said something like "thank god we have moved on from shit like this"

I guess I'm "woke" now or whatever.
 

Boke1879

Member
Dave, this isn't the hill to die on.

She knew what she was doing. Why lie about it? She knew what would happen. And she kept fucking quiet about it for 60 years.
 
Even if she didn't know her lie had repercussions in the first place, she double downed on it and got two murderers free from sentencing. The same two received 3000 for an interview where they admit guilt.
 

Enzom21

Member
I never said she didn't do a bad thing, I said she might not have the foresight to know what would happen as a result of her bad thing - which I don't think is very controversial and we have no way of asking her. All we have is second hand information from interviews.
What are you basing this on and why do you even care?

Dude, what the fuck is the point of your argument? Like why are you making it?
We have to absolve her of some of her responsibility for Emmett's horrific murder.
 
You should probably add to the OP that she died in 2014.

You could argue she didn't knew what would happen because of her lie, but she probably knew her husband as well as anyone.

Where are you getting that she died in 2014? And nah fam, were not playing that game. That woman knew as well as anyone what happens when a White woman accuses a Black person of some kind of sexual "impropriety".
 

Tagyhag

Member
I feel like I read somewhere before that she had already confessed, maybe the 2007 confession was revealed somewhere else.

Either way, anyone with a brain knew she was lying. That kid did not have a death wish.

No idea why she did lie though, kid paid for his candy and you kill him for it?
 
She will die a hated person. Her legacy is of lies and murder. The world will be a better place without her. There is no justice in her admission, only more hurt. I hope she dies knowing the harm she caused the world.
 
The entire account is crazy to read, for people who have never really lived in the South:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till#Encounter_between_Till_and_Carolyn_Bryant

That and the murder section are just ... wow.

Where are you getting that she died in 2014?

People I think are confusing the widow of the other brother with Carolyn, I don't believe the woman who OP is referring to - Carolyn - is dead. In fact OP's article even says she is 82 and in hiding.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/27/emmett-till-juanita-milam/5873235/
 
What are you basing this on and why do you even care?


We have to absolve her of some of her responsibility for Emmet's horrific murder.

Not on facts. Lynching was extremely common back then & everyone wouldve subconsciously understood the kind of violent backlash that accusation would create.

It's like someone in today's age accusing someone of terrorism, then pretending they wouldnt have known about the consequences that would befall the target of that accusation.
 
Not only was it commonplace, they fucking got paid for murdering a black child.
635564823665336226-AP-George-Zimmerman.jpg
.
 
I never said she didn't do a bad thing, I said she might not have the foresight to know what would happen as a result of her bad thing - which I don't think is very controversial and we have no way of asking her. All we have is second hand information from interviews.

She is dead.

She's not dead according to that Vanity Fair article.
 

Lowmelody

Member
I never said she didn't do a bad thing, I said she might not have the foresight to know what would happen as a result of her bad thing - which I don't think is very controversial and we have no way of asking her. All we have is second hand information from interviews.

She is dead.

Foresight.

It's basic causality. It's not two, three or four steps ahead, it's one.

Of all the cases to conjure nuance and moderation you choose Till. Even the smallest attempt to blunt the story is egregious.
 

Gattsu25

Banned
I feel like I read somewhere before that she had already confessed, maybe the 2007 confession was revealed somewhere else.

Either way, anyone with a brain knew she was lying. That kid did not have a death wish.

No idea why she did lie though, kid paid for his candy and you kill him for it?
Many lynchings were because of black success.

Well dressed blacks were at risk every time a jealous crowd walked passed them. Black businesses and churches were at risk of getting firebombed.

A child buying candy is a show of a degree of economic fluidity. That simple act alone could have been what put him at risk. Especially if the other people in the store were ain't shit racists that were okay with murdering a child over their own insecurities (hint: they were)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom