• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

I'm noticing a lot of celebrities are advertising the Switch now

Lol at the people thinking its paid. Weeknd is a gamer.

FADER-13_uftpfm.jpg



Guarantee if a thread was made with these photos, there wouldn't even be an issue that's currently being brought up.
 
Maybe they just like the Switch

I've thought all of Nintendo's hardware since after the GBA and GCN have been trash but the Switch is a massive step up. It's actually really nice. And Mario Kart has always been huge.
 

Budi

Member
Guys, how much you think that fake ass Terry Crews has got already for pretending to care about games?
Even pulling his kid into the scheme, absolutely disgusting.
 

Bronetta

Ask me about the moon landing or the temperature at which jet fuel burns. You may be surprised at what you learn.
Him being a gamer doesn't make it not payed man. You pay influencers who can influence potential customers.

Its also possible that a person known to like video games is just showing a video game he likes.

Unless you have explicit proof its a paid endorsement.
 

Somnid

Member
I'd imagine for someone who travels and has sporadic free time, but still enjoys high-quality games Switch is a God-send.
 

Futureman

Member
Why have people spelled paid as payed like 30 times in here?

There's a strong possibility these celebrities were paid or sent free Switches but no one knows for sure. Just because you "work in advertising" doesn't make you an omniscient god.
 

VegiHam

Member
Its also possible that a person known to like video games is just showing a video game he likes.

Unless you have explicit proof its a paid endorsement.

I'm not saying I think it is; I just think there's no had proof it isn't.

I do agree the burden of the proof would be on #TeamAd legally though.
 
Its also possible that a person known to like video games is just showing a video game he likes.

Unless you have explicit proof its a paid endorsement.

Why is your default assumption that a celebrity that is experienced with product placement is not participating in such a marketing tactic?

I can fully believe that these celebrities enjoy the Switch, just like I can assume that some people enjoy Beats by Dr Dre, but why is your assumption that it is an organic post that is not influenced by Nintendo?

I can be wrong, and I'm okay with that outcome (thought my point of view is that they did not buy the Switches and signed some deal to do a social media push--no other obligations), but it is interesting how you give celebrities the benefit of the doubt instead of looking at them with a critical eye when products are shown.

I do not believe it makes sense to give trust to celebrities, brands, or companies until they have shown a history of clear intentions.
 
Why is your default assumption that a celebrity that is experienced with product placement is not participating in such a marketing tactic?

I can fully believe that these celebrities enjoy the Switch, just like I can assume that some people enjoy Beats by Dr Dre, but why is your assumption that it is an organic post that is not influenced by Nintendo?

I can be wrong, and I'm okay with that outcome, but it is interesting how you give celebrities the benefit of the doubt instead of looking at them with a critical eye when products are shown.

As others have said there are typically guidelines for posting advertisements where you need to clearly indicate it's an advertisement. Whether or not people follow those guidelines is a different story.

Also the fact that the post talks about "shit talkin" and doesn't mention the word Nintendo or Switch once, should suggest it's not a paid ad.
 

GlamFM

Banned
What's the current regulatory landscape like now? Do these paid tweets need to be disclosed or is everyone waiting for the first fine to see what happens?

Can only speak for they German market.

Right now it's not regulated at all.

We pay influencers left and right for mentioning a shampoo or whatever in a snap or tweet.

YouTube is pushing some rules now, but influencer marketing is still the Wild West right now.
 

atr0cious

Member
a critical eye when products are shown.
So a musician that travels and already owns other systems won't buy a switch because? What makes the switch so different that they wouldn't buy one and talk about it on their own? Or are we at a point where celebrities don't like anything unless paid?
 

oneils

Member
Can only speak for they German market.

Right now it's not regulated at all.

We pay influencers left and right for mentioning a shampoo or whatever in a snap or tweet.

YouTube is pushing some rules now, but influencer marketing is still the Wild West right now.

Awesome, thanks for the reply. Even with talk of guidelines in North America, it seems like the Wild West here too.
 
As others have said there are typically guidelines for posting advertisements where you need to clearly indicate it's an advertisement. Whether or not people follow those guidelines is a different story.

Also the fact that the post talks about "shit talkin" and doesn't mention the word Nintendo or Switch once, should suggest it's not a paid ad.

I think your comments are valid and logical but I do not know how clear it is when it comes to social media especially with this new domain of marketing being called "influencer marketing."

Your second post is an even stronger argument on why this case might not be product placement.
 
Lol at the people thinking its paid. Weeknd is a gamer.

http://res.cloudinary.com/thefader/image/upload/s--feUt1FmW--/w_1440,c_limit,q_jpegmini,f_auto/FADER-13_uftpfm.jpg[/ig][/QUOTE]

Tons of celebrities are gamers. Doesn't mean they aren't getting paid or deals sharing gaming related things on their social media. Its literally a job or multiple jobs to run a popular social media accounts.

The Switch is barely in stock anywhere so where are all these celebrities getting their Switches? Are they giving in to scalpers or camping on forums like everyone else waiting for it to go back on stock? lol
 

JeTmAn81

Member
Tons of celebrities are gamers. Doesn't mean they aren't getting paid or deals sharing gaming related things on their social media. Its literally a job or multiple jobs to run a popular social media accounts.

The Switch is barely in stock anywhere so where are all these celebrities getting their Switches? Are they giving in to scalpers or camping on forums like everyone else waiting for it to go back on stock? lol

Celebrities have connections, it's not hard to get all kinds of things, for free as well.
 
So a musician that travels and already owns other systems won't buy a switch because? What makes the switch so different that they wouldn't buy one and talk about it on their own? Or are we at a point where celebrities don't like anything unless paid?

I think we are passed the point where we should question all celebrities when they post about a product. (Meaning question every product placement you see by a celebrity)

I don't think it is a hard concept to understand and within this thread people are mixing arguments. Just because someone believes that celebrities are purposefully making social media pushes for a product DOES NOT mean that the same celebrity is not a fan of the item.

But celebrities do not do most things for free. So you should always question why a product is being posted by someone with a mass influence.
 
I think your comments are valid and logical but I do not know how clear it is when it comes to social media especially with this new domain of marketing being called "influencer marketing."

Your second post is an even stronger argument on why this case might not be product placement.

I mean it could certainly be a paid ad but I think it's pretty unlikely. It's very likely though that Nitnendo sent him a free Switch and was hoping he'd talk it up in social media. That type of thing isn't uncommon at all.

Tons of celebrities are gamers. Doesn't mean they aren't getting paid or deals sharing gaming related things on their social media. Its literally a job or multiple jobs to run a popular social media accounts.

The Switch is barely in stock anywhere so where are all these celebrities getting their Switches? Are they giving in to scalpers or camping on forums like everyone else waiting for it to go back on stock? lol

No one is saying that Nintendo isn't handing out free Switches to some celebrities, but there are rules about actual paid ads (again, whether or not the rules are followed is another question) and the post in the OP doesn't sound at all like an ad. The word Nintendo or Switch is not mentioned once. The John Mayer tweet may very well be an ad though it could be against FTC guidelines if so. But the Weekend's post looks nothing like an actual paid ad.
 

Mariolee

Member
I've worked in marketing for years and even I'm not this cynical. I wonder what makes people think this way? Are you also one of the people who thinks that all good review scores for games you don't like are paid off?

People not working in marketing are more confident about their wrong theories because they have no real life experiences that prove they're wrong otherwise.
 

GlamFM

Banned
Worth noting of course that you can't be sure that it was payd for, but in this day and age you should at least question it.

There are more obvious examples:

barcelona_nintendo_switch.jpg
 
Worth noting of course that you can't be sure that it was payd for, but in this day and age you should at least question it.

There are more obvious examples:

barcelona_nintendo_switch.jpg

A photo like this is questionable, but the topic photo is really not. Abel is a gamer and likes Mario Kart.

There's some photos of him playing Mario Kart GP. Are people gonna starting telling me Nintendo paid him to take photos at an arcade while playing MK GP too?
 

jholmes

Member
This thread is actually just about one post from the Weeknd and one post from John Mayer, right?

"a lot of celebrities"
 
I think we are passed the point where we should question all celebrities when they post about a product.

I don't think it is a hard concept to understand and within this thread people are mixing arguments. Just because someone believes that celebrities are purposefully making social media pushes for a product DOES NOT mean that the same celebrity is not a fan of the item.

But celebrities do not do most things for free. So you should always question why a product is being posted by someone with a mass influence.

its clearly a hard concept for some people tho.

Celebrities have connections, it's not hard to get all kinds of things, for free as well.

Proves my point. If you are a celebrity or a celebrity's assistant would you be camping on cheapass gamer or contact nintendo and say "hey i can't find any switches, send me 20 switches with a bunch of games and i'll tweet this from john mayers twitter"
 
I mean it could certainly be a paid ad but I think it's pretty unlikely. It's very likely though that Nitnendo sent him a free Switch and was hoping he'd talk it up in social media. That type of thing isn't uncommon at all.
So I think we agree with each other essentially.

I think it is highly likely that Nintendo sent the Switch to them with the plan of a social media push. From your post it sounds like you assume Nintendo would leave it up to the person but I believe Nintendo contacted the celebrity's management team to ensure the post. Now with my POV it would be reasonable to expect a caption stating that it was a product placement (ad), but there is none. So that's why I'm very open to being wrong but I do not think the benefit of the doubt should be granted without discussing the possibility and past actions taken by someone that posts products.

I don't believe money was moved from Nintendo to any individual but I do believe Nintendo sent a good amount of Switches to ensure that it was a mutually beneficial deal.
 
Guarantee if a thread was made with these photos, there wouldn't even be an issue that's currently being brought up.

There already was a thread. Folks thought it was cool.

This is one of those weird Nintendo conspiracy theories, like hardware shortages on popular products.

Mario Kart is one of those games ingrained into modern culture. Folks are going to play it. A lot of shit will be talked. Friendships will end.


Also, they have to hashtag "ad" on stuff now if it's paid content.
 
Some people just don't believe that anyone genuinely enjoys a thing they don't. Sad.

Do you normally put blind trust into celebrities, brands, and corporations?

Because that is how I look at the situation. When you are a celebrity you are no longer viewed as an average individual. I don't know how you can argue otherwise.
 
No one is saying that Nintendo isn't handing out free Switches to some celebrities, but there are rules about actual paid ads (again, whether or not the rules are followed is another question) and the post in the OP doesn't sound at all like an ad. The word Nintendo or Switch is not mentioned once. The John Mayer tweet may very well be an ad though it could be against FTC guidelines if so. But the Weekend's post looks nothing like an actual paid ad.

See well that makes more sense.

but i'll side with the arguement that the one in the OP is an "ad". Looking at the rest of the WKNDs instagram its all professionally-done curated photos and posts promoting himself. Then out of nowhere its a TV with MK8. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Alas, i dont think anyone here can prove any side these points so lets celebrate Switches!
 

oneils

Member
...

Also, they have to hashtag "ad" on stuff now if it's paid content.

Only in the US as far as I know, and the weeknd is Canadian.
Edit: and does anyone have a real world example of this new FTC guideline being enforced? I'm assuming they go after the sponsor rather than the "sponsee" (is that a word lol?). I though I remember an article on it but can't find it.

Oh wow: found this https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/pre...-ftc-charges-it-failed-adequately-disclose-it

Looks like FTC is not messing around.
 
Top Bottom