Not only that, but
Spoilered as you haven't got that far yet!
I enjoyed River Song a lot when she first appeared in the Library episode, but never really liked her during the Matt Smith era. It's probably because of the writing. I started enjoying the show way less - and eventually stopped watching it altogether - as soon as Moffat became showrunner, and River Song was but one reason amongst many.
Time Lords are what I wish for humanity in time... not time travellers - but gender fluid, not defined by one or the other, neither. That's probably why I'm very happy about the female Doctor because I hope they don't change the way the Doctor is, it's the same character just a new body, doesn't matter if its male or female - the character is the same.I like that its suggested that the General had been female before, very cool.
It is - the character says. Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual."Back to normal" and that all her previous incarnations bar that one had been female
Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual.
I mean, isn't it? The Doctor is over 2000 years old and has regenerated 13 times now and every time he's ended up with a male body. It also took a really long time before the Master ultimately regenerated into a woman. I think we've probably been meant to infer that regenerating into a new gender is probably a relatively rare thing for Time Lords/Ladies,
even if it certainly isn't unheard of.
Possibly, although I'd hope that doesn't factor into casting choices going forward. Hopefully they'll pick whoever's best for the role going forward, and not go back to another string of men as the history of the show suggests being a different gender is rare. The reason it was rare is due to the gender politics of the time and I'd rather not have that influence the lore of the show.
Never seen Doctor Who, other than maybe one or two random episodes that I found so terrible that I wrote the entire series off.
With that said, is there any reason in the Doctor Who mythology that says it must be a man?
For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?
If not, are people just crying because it's a woman after being a man for so many years?
His name is Doctor Who =pI think the doc has a name but only a couple people know it. The character always goes by "the doctor"
His name is Doctor Who =p
Moffat's greatest contribution is making this canon.
And his worst was beating us over the head with it.Moffat's greatest contribution is making this canon.
...
Imagine being this person.
I would not be against seeing Captain Jack again. I miss the character and Torchwood. :/
For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?
Possibly, although I'd hope that doesn't factor into casting choices going forward. Hopefully they'll pick whoever's best for the role going forward, and not go back to another string of men as the history of the show suggests being a different gender is rare. The reason it was rare is due to the gender politics of the time and I'd rather not have that influence the lore of the show.
Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?
Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?
Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?
So that's where Eccelston ended up.He may or may not be the Face of Bo, so I guess he is on a different aging/evolution trajectory all together.
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.
Glad to see the overwhelming response seems positive.
Edgelords on both sides of the political spectrum are showing us how hardcore they are, and how this is actually the worse thing that could have happened
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.
..How ?
The worst I saw from the feminists were "Awesome, but let's remember that being a white woman means a lot to the PoC representation on the show"
Actually, this makes me wonder: The Doctor tends to default to Doctor John Smith if he needs a human-sounding name... I wonder what Whittaker will use? Part of me thinks that she'll just use John, in character due to not understanding why that would make the Daily Mail types' heads explode... and in writing because... well, because it'd make Daily Mail types' heads explode.
A Gamergater should be the new companion. He is shot down by the Doctor every time he says sexist bullshit.
It's a new robot frog, named K-whine.
It is - the character says. Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual."Back to normal" and that all her previous incarnations bar that one had been female
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.
Glad to see the overwhelming response seems positive.
Edgelords on both sides of the political spectrum are showing us how hardcore they are, and how this is actually the worse thing that could have happened
No. River was able to speak the name to the door quietly so no one saw/heard it.
Yes it was a complete cop out. And I'm still confused by that episode, esspecially the doctor telling River 'you should have faded by now" Like wtf does that mean? Also (I'm on season 8 right now) Do we ever see River farther into the future than that? As obviously that was while she was in the computer system. Is it ever explained how she was able to exist in that moment of time, how the doctor could see her, and why she continued to exist even after Clara disappeared?
"The name" for that episode largely exists as an Unreveal. Which makes sense (although I never understood why Moffat then kept bringing it up)
We don't see River farther into her personal timeline as far as I can tell.
Why do you ask the question when it is clear you know the answer?Never seen Doctor Who, other than maybe one or two random episodes that I found so terrible that I wrote the entire series off.
With that said, is there any reason in the Doctor Who mythology that says it must be a man?
For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?
If not, are people just crying because it's a woman after being a man for so many years?