• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Doctor Who: Jodie Whittaker announced as the 13th Doctor!

iFirez

Member
Not only that, but
Spoilered as you haven't got that far yet!

I like that its suggested that the General had been female before, very cool.
Time Lords are what I wish for humanity in time... not time travellers - but gender fluid, not defined by one or the other, neither. That's probably why I'm very happy about the female Doctor because I hope they don't change the way the Doctor is, it's the same character just a new body, doesn't matter if its male or female - the character is the same.
 

Kilrogg

paid requisite penance

Perhaps I didn't phrase my opinion well enough: I meant that Silence in the Library, where River Song first appeared and helped Tenth, was a great episode that instantly made me interested in her character.

Then she showed up in Season 5 onwards, and I didn't like her then despite really liking her introduction. I surmise it's mostly because of Moffat. Moffat-era Who just doesn't do much for me. It's not exactly an uncommon opinion to hold that the series started to go to crap once he became showrunner, so I don't know why you're acting so surprised. Again, maybe I just phrased my post poorly.

[EDIT] The one exception is Rory. I usually don't care for male sidekicks, but he's great in a way Mickey can only dream to be.
 

mcrommert

Banned
I enjoyed River Song a lot when she first appeared in the Library episode, but never really liked her during the Matt Smith era. It's probably because of the writing. I started enjoying the show way less - and eventually stopped watching it altogether - as soon as Moffat became showrunner, and River Song was but one reason amongst many.

Same... All the hand waving cuteness with the story got so old that I was done basically after impossible astronaut and the doctors death nonsense... It's really a robot!! Didn't like a lot of the earlier seasons bad endings but Moffat made me not care.

So I don't care about the new lead as i stopped caring a long time ago
 

wetflame

Pizza Dog
I like that its suggested that the General had been female before, very cool.
Time Lords are what I wish for humanity in time... not time travellers - but gender fluid, not defined by one or the other, neither. That's probably why I'm very happy about the female Doctor because I hope they don't change the way the Doctor is, it's the same character just a new body, doesn't matter if its male or female - the character is the same.

It is - the character says
"Back to normal" and that all her previous incarnations bar that one had been female
. Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
It is - the character says
"Back to normal" and that all her previous incarnations bar that one had been female
. Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual.

It does sort of seem that way - most Time Lords we've observed seemed to have preferred to stick to one or the other, if not absolutely. Might be like styles - you try a new hairdo, doesn't work out, go back to a variation on the old look.
 
As someone who has watched Who since the early 80's (American, so my first Doctor was Tom Baker), I'm looking forward to this. And for those complaining about "liberal agenda" in Doctor Who, like it's a new thing, where were you during the Classic Doctor stories like "The Green Death", or Sarah Jane Smith's run as the Doctor's companion? There was always a liberal lean to Who stories from at least the 3rd Doctor on.
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual.

I mean, isn't it supposed to be? The Doctor is over 2000 years old and has regenerated 13 times now and every time he's ended up with a male body. It also took a really long time before the Master ultimately regenerated into a woman. I think we've probably been meant to infer that regenerating into a new gender is probably a relatively rare thing for Time Lords/Ladies,
even if it certainly isn't unheard of in relation to their society.

There's probably a biological reason why The Doctor has regenerated into a male body 13 times. Otherwise, he'd look like something of an oddity himself.
 

wetflame

Pizza Dog
I mean, isn't it? The Doctor is over 2000 years old and has regenerated 13 times now and every time he's ended up with a male body. It also took a really long time before the Master ultimately regenerated into a woman. I think we've probably been meant to infer that regenerating into a new gender is probably a relatively rare thing for Time Lords/Ladies,
even if it certainly isn't unheard of.

Possibly, although I'd hope that doesn't factor into casting choices going forward. Hopefully they'll pick whoever's best for the role going forward, and not go back to another string of men as the history of the show suggests being a different gender is rare. The reason it was rare is due to the gender politics of the time and I'd rather not have that influence the lore of the show.

To address your edit: there's no in-canon biological reason for the Doctor to remain a single gender throughout the show, and there shouldn't be. This casting shouldn't be seen as a gimmick one-off. We should ignore the fact that external factors lead to so many males in a row, and just accept that this is the new status quo going forward.

Alternatively, if you want to acknowledge the string of male incarnations, then we can say when the Time Lords gifted the Doctor a new regeneration cycle it fixed whatever was wrong with the process that kept him stuck as male all that time. Now they can be whatever gender the regeneration happens to take them to.
 
Never seen Doctor Who, other than maybe one or two random episodes that I found so terrible that I wrote the entire series off.

With that said, is there any reason in the Doctor Who mythology that says it must be a man?

For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?

If not, are people just crying because it's a woman after being a man for so many years?
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
Possibly, although I'd hope that doesn't factor into casting choices going forward. Hopefully they'll pick whoever's best for the role going forward, and not go back to another string of men as the history of the show suggests being a different gender is rare. The reason it was rare is due to the gender politics of the time and I'd rather not have that influence the lore of the show.

Well, if you think about it, now the Doctor is about to become a woman...you could make an argument that he's statistically more like to regenerate into a woman in the future now that's become his body's default setting, in a similar way that he was a male by default before. :p
 
I would think anyone truly upset by a perceived political agenda would have bailed on this show from the Eccleston period, honestly. The show (nuWho, anyway) has always been very progressive, with interracial couples, able female companions, bisexuals, calling out racism and classism, etc. Most recently is has had Master-as-Missy and Bill, a black gay companion.

Are these people complaining even watching the show? I wonder how many are expressing outrage from a distance, and aren't even fans?
 

Kurdel

Banned
Glad to see the overwhelming response seems positive.

Edgelords on both sides of the political spectrum are showing us how hardcore they are, and how this is actually the worse thing that could have happened
 

Azerth

Member
Never seen Doctor Who, other than maybe one or two random episodes that I found so terrible that I wrote the entire series off.

With that said, is there any reason in the Doctor Who mythology that says it must be a man?

For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?

If not, are people just crying because it's a woman after being a man for so many years?

I think the doc has a name but only a couple people know it. The character always goes by "the doctor"
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
Moffat's greatest contribution is making this canon.

His name is the greatest question! The biggest, most important question in the universe! Reality itself would rip itself apart if it is ever mentioned!

Man, I hated all that stuff. Moffat really went off the rails for me as a writer after Series 5 wrapped up.
 

mclem

Member
For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?

Actually, this makes me wonder: The Doctor tends to default to Doctor John Smith if he needs a human-sounding name... I wonder what Whittaker will use? Part of me thinks that she'll just use John, in character due to not understanding why that would make the Daily Mail types' heads explode... and in writing because... well, because it'd make Daily Mail types' heads explode.
 
Possibly, although I'd hope that doesn't factor into casting choices going forward. Hopefully they'll pick whoever's best for the role going forward, and not go back to another string of men as the history of the show suggests being a different gender is rare. The reason it was rare is due to the gender politics of the time and I'd rather not have that influence the lore of the show.

It's why I think it's important to establish it as a character thing. The impression I've gotten is that regeneration has a bit of a choice to it. Not flawless, but there is some sort of control/input from the Timelord regenerating. So I see it as, in universe of course, the Doctor choosing for his past 13 incarnations to be male.

I think then to make sure its done right it needs to be the Doctor's choice to veer away from his established persona. It then ensures long term that it'll feel natural for the Doctor to jump back and forth between genders. My biggest concern is getting this one right so that it doesn't ultimately end up say, 5-10 years from now, viewed as a gimmick, that one singular time the Doctor was a woman and then permanently skirted.


Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?

Spoilers but:
Isn't Jack the face of Bo or whatever from the first couple seasons? So he just ages stupid slow?
 

Kurdel

Banned
Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?

He may or may not be the Face of Bo, so I guess he is on a different aging/evolution trajectory all together.

face-of-bo.jpg
 

tomtom94

Member
Captain Jack is supposed to be immortal, isn't he? He looks kinda old now. Is his immortality supposed to include everlasting youth, or just veeeeery slow aging?

Veeeeery slow aging is sort of canon courtesy of the series 3 finale.

I think Jack could come back for an anniversary special but they need to be careful. The worst thing the show could possibly do is lean on RTD-era nostalgia. Needs to be its own thing.
 
You can pick up with Captain Jack after a few hundred/thousand years to explain his age. He's immortal but still growing older as established in canon.
 

bengraven

Member
I was having a good time watching the reactions but then getting a few disappointed people really kind of pissed me off. I'm not judging them by their character but just the reactions were the kind of stereotypes you would expect.

It would be different if they were saying "man that's ridiculous making him a woman that stupid". But but getting very very quiet staring into nothing and saying "this honestly breaks my heart" in a calm voice makes me even more furious.

On another note, I can finally relate to girls during the tenant, Davidson and Smith run. I finally get to say that the doctor is fucking hot.
 

Platy

Member
Glad to see the overwhelming response seems positive.

Edgelords on both sides of the political spectrum are showing us how hardcore they are, and how this is actually the worse thing that could have happened

..How ?
The worst I saw from the feminists were "Awesome, but let's remember that being a white woman means a lot to the PoC representation on the show"
 

mclem

Member
..How ?
The worst I saw from the feminists were "Awesome, but let's remember that being a white woman means a lot to the PoC representation on the show"

A full-fledged black male companion might not be a bad idea as a counterpart. We've had Mickey and Riggsy, but each has only been in a couple of episodes and Riggsy hasn't even had a TARDIS trip.
 

Rivian

Neo Member
Actually, this makes me wonder: The Doctor tends to default to Doctor John Smith if he needs a human-sounding name... I wonder what Whittaker will use? Part of me thinks that she'll just use John, in character due to not understanding why that would make the Daily Mail types' heads explode... and in writing because... well, because it'd make Daily Mail types' heads explode.

"I'm, uh, Doe. Doctor Jane Doe."

Sticking with John Smith would be fantastic.
 

VAD

Member
A Gamergater should be the new companion. He is shot down by the Doctor every time he says sexist bullshit.
 
It is - the character says
"Back to normal" and that all her previous incarnations bar that one had been female
. Not sure if that's an unfortunate choice of words though as it suggests that a change of gender might be an oddity or unusual.

When speaking of the Corsair, the Doctor also made it seem like gender swapping was less common.

Seems like it's a rarity but not extraordinary.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
Isnt the Doctor's name Please?
The gates opened when they said it.

No. River was able to speak the name to the door quietly so no one saw/heard it.

Yes it was a complete cop out. And I'm still confused by that episode, esspecially the doctor telling River 'you should have faded by now" Like wtf does that mean? Also (I'm on season 8 right now) Do we ever see River farther into the future than that? As obviously that was while she was in the computer system. Is it ever explained how she was able to exist in that moment of time, how the doctor could see her, and why she continued to exist even after Clara disappeared?
 

jstripes

Banned
Glad to see the overwhelming response seems positive.

Edgelords on both sides of the political spectrum are showing us how hardcore they are, and how this is actually the worse thing that could have happened

Edge Lords. There's a great new villain concept for Doctor Who! They can travel to the far edges of reality with their logic distortion fedoras.
 

tomtom94

Member
No. River was able to speak the name to the door quietly so no one saw/heard it.

Yes it was a complete cop out. And I'm still confused by that episode, esspecially the doctor telling River 'you should have faded by now" Like wtf does that mean? Also (I'm on season 8 right now) Do we ever see River farther into the future than that? As obviously that was while she was in the computer system. Is it ever explained how she was able to exist in that moment of time, how the doctor could see her, and why she continued to exist even after Clara disappeared?

"The name" for that episode largely exists as an Unreveal. Which makes sense (although I never understood why Moffat then kept bringing it up)

We don't see River farther into her personal timeline as far as I can tell.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
"The name" for that episode largely exists as an Unreveal. Which makes sense (although I never understood why Moffat then kept bringing it up)

We don't see River farther into her personal timeline as far as I can tell.

Sad. I never understood why she couldnt be brought out of the system like the other people were. I just assumed it was saved for a time when the show needed a new plot, and bam "we re-materialized River, in a new body (because the actress is too old now)."
 
Never seen Doctor Who, other than maybe one or two random episodes that I found so terrible that I wrote the entire series off.

With that said, is there any reason in the Doctor Who mythology that says it must be a man?

For example, does the doctor have an actual name if it's the same person? Like his name is John, and now they've just turned into Joan or something to that effect?

If not, are people just crying because it's a woman after being a man for so many years?
Why do you ask the question when it is clear you know the answer?
 
Lame. Cannot give a female lead her own show so gotta steal one. It the only good sci-fi where the male lead not all guns and action as an answer to problems.

*DISCLAIMER*

To prevent shitpost replies, please be aware use of word 'steal' not literal.
 
Top Bottom