People just have a really hard time accepting women being good at things.
"There should be a reason why she's good"
(Reason x, y, z, as pulled from the text of the film proper)
"There should be
good reasons why she's good. You know, like Womp Rats. That sort of good storytelling."
I completely agree with her being a far better actress but that really isnt the point here. Her dialogue is certainly better written but as far as setting up an arc ill take the other two over her even though Anakin's takes far longer to pay dividends.
So she's written better, she's better at delivering the dialog she's been written, she's better at emoting, she's a better actor, she's working with better material and she executes it better.
And you guys are wondering why people believe in her character easily?
Maybe the reason you'll take the other two is because
you've seen their finished arcs already.
And even if that
isn't the reason, why would it matter when I'm directly comparing, one-to-one, their
introductions as characters? Even divorcing the rest of their arcs from the equasion, she's still written better and portrayed better as a character than either Luke or Anakin were.