• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DigitalFoundry analysis of DOOM for Nintendo Switch

Cerbero

Member
No it's not. I'm not talking about Doom here. I'm talking in general yes performance matter and not just presentation. Same reason some perfer FIFA over PES purely becuase "it's just better to play" in my brother's words who doesn't know what GAF is.

Yeah i get that a lot with my little cousins, when a game is 60fps they say that "it feels fast" even if they have no idea why or what framerate is, when i was i kid in the ps1 era i thought it had something to do with the cd reading speed, same for frame drops lol.
 
Yo totally down to admit I'm wrong if I'm wrong, but any source saying it's factually doubled docked?

Listen, if you're not going to read, don't waste my time. I said the frame rate was bad for Borderlands on Vita, I said I was going to buy Doom for Switch either way and that I was disappointed by the frame rate. Not only that, I laid out my reason as to why.

Eurogamer revealed the clocks. I'm on mobile but I can find the article.

As for wasting your time you called the game severely cut back when literally everyone who played it has said otherwise. Shell of the other versions isn't extreme hyperbole? Not sure whose being ridiculous here. The Borderlands stuff is just icing on the cake really.
 

heringer

Member
No it's not. I'm not talking about Doom here. I'm talking in general yes performance matter and not just presentation. Same reason some perfer FIFA over PES purely becuase "it's just better to play" in my brother's words who doesn't know what GAF is.

Framerate has no bearing in your brothers statement since both games are 60 fps.
 
Eurogamer revealed the clocks. I'm on mobile but I can find the article.

As for wasting your time you called the game severely cut back when literally everyone who played it has said otherwise. Shell of the other versions isn't extreme hyperbole? Not sure whose being ridiculous here. The Borderlands stuff is just icing on the cake really.

30 FPS is a severe cutback.
 

xenist

Member
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.
 
Framerate has no bearing in your brothers statement since both games are 60 fps.

The average person who plays games but doesnt know tech can probably tell framerate difference if they played one game at 30fps and then at 60fps. But they have no idea why. Which is what gets you the PES vs Fifa comparison.
 
While I always appreciate 60 over 30 fps when offered, I think we can all agree that anyone who doesn’t own another console or PC capable of playing this game at 60fps should still be able to glean plenty of enjoyment out of Doom at the lower framerate.

Or those who want a portable version, which is admittedly cool. :)
 
I can see preferring Vita due to the portability, but comfort? That I don't understand, but hey, maybe your hands are very different than mine.

More to distribution of weight and the ergonomics of it being one construct vs a tablet with two attached controllers.

For what it's worth I love the hell out of the Switch tablet itself, shit is thicc. Wouldn't mind browsing the web on it.
 

hemo memo

Gold Member
Careful with anecdotes, man. Your brother is probably a standup dude, but you really think the only reason people would prefer FIFA over PES is framerate? No features or anything else?

Yeah I know ofcource for other things too but the point is just because they can't detail the performance issues they perfer something because it playes better, faster etc.
 

mlclmtckr

Banned
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.

Yes guys we get it you don't want anybody to enjoy their Switch

I don't think this tactic is working though

Don't worry though when I'm playing and enjoying wolfenstein I'll be sure to pour one out for all the very concerned pixel counting posters ITT
 

.Anema

Member
It's a damn port for a PORTABLE console!
What's is wrong with almost everyone here!? 30fps it's unplayable? That's why so many people laughs at this forum and some of their users, I really can't take this thread.
Unbelievable.
 

AlphaDump

Gold Member
It sucks for the 30 fps, but otherwise, i think playing in handheld mode will mitigate a lot of the resolution/blurriness issues since it is confined to a small screen. If anything, this just represents how incredibly scalable the itech6 engine is. And you essentially have DOOM on the go, which is just awesome.

Either way, i think Nintendo fans are in for a treat. DOOM f'n rocks.
 

Lorcain

Member
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.
I'll play the hell out of portable Doom and Wolfenstein (and anything else cool that comes to the Switch). I have a gaming PC for when I want to max shit out and feel badass about my framerate and resolution.
 

Sayad

Member
No it's not. I'm not talking about Doom here. I'm talking in general yes performance matter and not just presentation. Same reason some perfer FIFA over PES purely becuase "it's just better to play" in my brother's words who doesn't know what GAF is.
Huh! But both Fifa and PES are 60fps!
 

EDarkness

Member
People expected 60fps?

From what is basically a tablet?

It looks remarkable for the fact it's Doom on a portable. Seriously. The fact it runs at all is mind boggling to me. If they can achieve that, this early before it even releases, then it's more about what iD Tech 6 engine can achieve on the system as middle ware is impressive.

No reason not to expect 60fps on a game that is 60fps and the developers of said game have touted 60fps as being a key point of the game. There are bunch of 60fps games on the NS already, so I don't see where people are going with this "you expected 60fps?" talk. 60fps games are not rare on the the system.
 
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.

Quality shitpost
 

Papacheeks

Banned
Yes guys we get it you don't want anybody to enjoy their Switch

I don't think this tactic is working though

Don't worry though when I'm playing and enjoying wolfenstein I'll be sure to pour one out for all the very concerned pixel counting posters ITT

No.

We want people to play games the way they are meant to be played. Mario Kart doesn't run at 30fps when in handheld mode, same with splatoon. If they were given more time and maybe a little bit more money from Nintendo to make a specific version like what they did with NBA2K, it might be a different game, but the things that matter the most would be prioritized.

Even if it looks like a more cartoony version with a different renderer, and was sub 720p as long as the shooting stayed at 60 fps the core of the feel and gameplay wouldn't be compromised.

Because now change in pacing, reaction time, animation speeds for actions, and what not are going to playout differently. It may resemble doom in it's weapons, monsters, but it won't play as frantic as doom does on PS4/ XBOX. And to me thats what matters most.

From what I've seen the urgency of quick action is not there, it's now more paced instead of being split decision/reaction time, which is what doom is all about.
 
No reason not to expect 60fps on a game that is 60fps and the developers of said game have touted 60fps as being a key point of the game. There are bunch of 60fps games on the NS already, so I don't see where people are going with this "you expected 60fps?" talk. 60fps games are not rare on the the system.

If you expected a doom port at 60fps on switch and find yourself disappointed, then that’s on you. It was an unrealistic expectation from the start.
 

PrimeBeef

Member
That's... disappointing. Doom is one of the few games where 60 fps is really critical to the experience.
Meh. Played it before I upgraded to a 1070, it hovered between 30 and 35 fps. Played it again just thus week at 60. I don't recall enjoying it more. But then low drame rates have never bothered me.
 

tengiants

Member
From a gameplay perspective, I guess we're getting a little more than 16 ms potential latency because of the 30 fps drop?

A difference, but not too bad in a single player or even multiplayer setup when just trying to have fun. At least it's an even playing field.
 
You know what the world needed? A CONSOLE version of Doom, that runs worse than THE PC VERSION, plays worse than THE PC VERSION and looks worse than THE PC VERSION. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.

Fixed that for you, since every version that isn't the best version apparently is shit in your eyes. (and this isn't even getting into the fact there is no proof that it plays worse unless I am mistaken)
 

DrGrus

Member
True. Everyone plays games at different times at different places in different situations. The main plus (only?) of the Switch port will be portability. That's a fair point.

No another plus is that if you do not own any other consol or PC you can play Doom. I personally think that there are a lot of people happy owning one gaming machine.
 
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.
Why are you so furious about it???
 
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.
An Atari version would be awesome
 

dawid

Member
I love Digital Foundry, but these "we built this PC to simulate console hardware X"-features are just dumb fillouts. If they would have any actual hardware architecture experience i'm sure they would just stay away from that type of guess-work comparisons.

The same could be said for the features with video from trailers as the only source. I mean that Doom-trailer could just be a video-rip of a video-rip of the PC version with video compression quality loss.
 
All the improvements made to the Frostbite engine. I wasn't talking about FPS in the first. My point was that performance matter.

To an extent of course.

That being said, the larger market has shown that they generally prefer higher graphical quality > 60FPS, for example. Or on the flipside, that 30FPS is an acceptable standard.
 

Alchemy

Member
I'm sure they're stuck at 30 because of CPU bottlenecks so changing the pixel count won't do anything. Kinda disappointing but portable Doom is still super rad. This isn't just a second game made for portables but taking a console game and shoving it onto a portable. Still really impressive shit.
 

Qassim

Member
No reason not to expect 60fps on a game that is 60fps and the developers of said game have touted 60fps as being a key point of the game. There are bunch of 60fps games on the NS already, so I don't see where people are going with this "you expected 60fps?" talk. 60fps games are not rare on the the system.

60fps games that look like DOOM? I don't think there are any 60fps games on the Switch that come anywhere close.
 

ghibli99

Member
We're in the system's first six months, and all this doom and gloom. Although I've already played through it on PC, and I'm not its target audience, I still think it looks terrific for a game that was never designed for this hardware.
 
You know what the world needed? A portable version of Doom, that runs worse than every other version, plays worse than every other version and looks worse than every other version. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.

C-eSjClUQAA9JBz.jpg


I haven't been keeping up with the thread, but if this is a representative sample of what's been going on here... Yikes.
 
If this bad boy is 720p docked I'm just gonna get it. I don't mind 30fps but lower than 720p on my TV would be a bit meh.

I thought GameXplain was told it was 720p handheld. Wouldn't that indicate at least 720p docked, more likely 900p?

Potentially up to those numbers with dynamic res.
 

EDarkness

Member
60fps games that look like DOOM? I don't think there are any 60fps games on the Switch that come anywhere close.

That's the thing, I don't think ANYONE expected the game to look like the PS4 version and I think people would have been perfectly fine with the graphical trade off in order to get that 60fps.
 

Mike Golf

Member
Originally Posted by xenist
You know what the world needed? A CONSOLE version of Doom, that runs worse than THE PC VERSION, plays worse than THE PC VERSION and looks worse than THE PC VERSION. They should do a port for smartphones next.

I can't wait for Wolfenstein.

Fixed that for you, since every version that isn't the best version apparently is shit in your eyes. (and this isn't even getting into the fact there is no proof that it plays worse unless I am mistaken)

Exactly the fix I was going to make.

Take that comment and apply to any game not played on PC at a high spec then.

Look, I'm bummed about the drop to 30fps too but the fact is on the Switch's screen there will be no input lag and that makes a lot of difference to the feel of a game, even at 30fps. It's the same reason a locked 30fps game on a CRT doesn't feel sluggish by nature.

I hope Bethesda puts out a demo for the game so everyone can get a feel for themselves how it plays before buying.
 

hemo memo

Gold Member
To an extent of course.

That being said, the larger market has shown that they generally prefer higher graphical quality > 60FPS, for example. Or on the flipside, that 30FPS is an acceptable standard.

100%

Also my favorite hack&slash game is DmC and 30FPS is by no means "unplayable"
 
Top Bottom