Maybe it's 100% cel shaded...
With this art style.
They've shown CoD in their conferences a few times, actually.
They just don't dedicate 20+ minutes to it.
Or maybe...
I think if that happens that is the new froggy. Bleuh
Maybe it's 100% cel shaded...
With this art style.
They've shown CoD in their conferences a few times, actually.
They just don't dedicate 20+ minutes to it.
Wait, IGN is part of NewsCorp?
Sorry for bringing politics into this, but my opinion of IGN just shot significantly lower.
Why all the hate over that IGN poll btw? Is it a "my opinion is much better than their opinion" kinda thing? It is a simple poll where people votes what they are most excisted about, which is completely opinion based.
So it sounds like John Harker might have heard something about this too...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=38020240&postcount=560
Can't wait!
Why all the hate over that IGN poll btw? Is it a "my opinion is much better than their opinion" kinda thing? It is a simple poll where people votes what they are most excisted about, which is completely opinion based.
Probably just mean that 64% of those who votes wants better graphics more than the other vote choices (anyone know what they were?). But i agree that this phrase is a bit weird written.Most of them want more coverage on better graphics.
What does that even mean?
All I know is that it's not supposed to be an existing IP and that it targets the PS360 crowd. Metroid x Star Fox doesn't fit that. And with it supposedly not being an existing IP, a new one is the only logical solution.
Apparently if you have the new Call of Duty demoed at your show, you "win".
All I know is that it's not supposed to be an existing IP and that it targets the PS360 crowd. Metroid x Star Fox doesn't fit that. And with it supposedly not being an existing IP, a new one is the only logical solution.
In this last gen especially, it has become a bit of a 3rd-party entitlement that hardware makers help foot the cost on things like marketing, publishing, or just platform exclusivity.
The source of this entitlement is spurred by trying to subsidize rising production costs, which most developers will never admit to, or change by doing something smart and scaling back.
With Epic saying that "they want to drag the industry into the next generation", I don't think many have learned their lesson.
Call of duty... exclusive for Wii U.
Imagine the fallout.
If anything this Star Fox x Metroid game could turn out to be an NST game!
does Ravenblade count as a old or new IP
Star Fox x Samus: March of the Metroids?
Why all the hate over that IGN poll btw? Is it a "my opinion is much better than their opinion" kinda thing? It is a simple poll where people votes what they are most excisted about, which is completely opinion based. One dont have to agree of course, but i dont see why there is hate/mocking around it.
For those of you who might have missed this interesting tidbit about Retro's game.
This too
Edit:
Beaten by the man himself
Yeah, i agree that there isnt exactly much "exciting" things on that poll. But i dont see any reason for people to have a downward tone against the result or IGN because of this At least that is how i read some of the comments, but i had to ask to be sure i didnt have misunderstood anything.The results are kinda disappointing, or don't really make much sense. GTA will be a non-presence, Microsoft are probably going to have the same conference as the last 2 years, there's going to be no PS4 news... it just seems like it was voted for by people who don't really know what they were talking about.
Apparently if you have the new Call of Duty demoed at your show, you "win".
Just got up and read the Paul Gale rumor, which is making me feel...
The idea is outright bizarro. How the heck would you not end up with watered down versions of both gameplay styles in a project like that? Its reminding me with what happened with Rogue Leader 3 - Rebel Strikes addition of on foot/ground based missions.
The one thing that would make more since to me is that there are no actual on foot metroid missions and instead Samus' ship is a playable option in a StarFox game as a cute little bonus for fans.
Imagine what could Retro do with the call of Duty license.
Is it possibe for Nintendo to buy the license for one exclusive game, to be developed internally by there own?
I think maybe that is why people are more curious about it, since we know nothing about it. But unfortunately we dont know how the percentage split is though. It might have been fairly close between WiiU, PS4 and Xbox 720.Still it's a bit of a strange poll when a new Nintendo console is coming out and we know next to nothing about a new PS/Xbox.
Possible? Yes.
Likely? Not in a billion years. At least, not for Call of Duty.
Time Splitters, however...
I'm still hoping Retro's project isn't a shooter. Would make me sad man.
John Harker has the best avatar around all of internet forums, just saying...
Imagine what could Retro do with the call of Duty license.
Is it possibe for Nintendo to buy the license for one exclusive game, to be developed internally by there own?
I know someone who always tried to convince me how great the MS conferences were the last years because he's so crazy about any new Halo and whatnot, while downplaying anything Nintendo (even 2010).
I thought he was a lone individual in that regard, but I underestimated the people that hang around at IGN. Or rather I try to forget that this site exists in the first place (Why r you people even posting their shit constantly here -_-)
Still gonna face palm if Retro makes an action oriented FPS.
Still gonna face palm if Retro makes an action oriented FPS.
Please god, no. If Retro wants to make a shooter in the CoD, or Battlefield mode, they can do so with a new IP. But I hope they do not make that type of game.
What if it turns out to be an awesome game?
Even nabbing exclusive marketing rights from ms would do wonders for wii u
meh I don't even think it's physically possible to have an action oriented FPS that is awesome. They've all been done a thousand times over in every possible variation, it would take some sort of weird unimaginable miracle to make it like that. It's just a bad idea to me. Leave that to the EAs and Activisions.What if it turns out to be an awesome game?
The MS exclusive deal with CoD ends this year, so Nintendo could try to jump in and grab the right away.
Shouldn't Retro get the benefit of the doubt in any game they make becoming awesome? Just preference of game types IMO.
meh I don't even think it's physically possible to have an action oriented FPS that is awesome. They've all been done a thousand times over in every possible variation, it would take some sort of weird unimaginable miracle to make it like that. It's just a bad idea to me. Leave that to the EAs and Activisions.
I don't mind FPS, but make it original if you're gonna do it, like Metroid Prime was when it came out, or the first Bioshock, or Portal. Or better yet just don't make an FPS at all
they get all the DLC maps firstWhat deal?
meh I don't even think it's physically possible to have an action oriented FPS that is awesome. They've all been done a thousand times over in every possible variation, it would take some sort of weird unimaginable miracle to make it like that. It's just a bad idea to me. Leave that to the EAs and Activisions.
I don't mind FPS, but make it original if you're gonna do it, like Metroid Prime was when it came out, or the first Bioshock, or Portal. Or better yet just don't make an FPS at all
Serious question here: why are third parties so damn retarded with the game choices they make on what to bring to a new platform?
Perfect example is this talk of the Aliens game. I'm not saying it's going to be bad, it might be actually pretty good. But isn't from the same exact developer, coming Borderlands 2 in the fall? Probably as a game franchise, one that has a lot more notoriety?
I could say the same about companies like THQ and Ubi Soft. Instead of the new Future Soldier game or whatever, Ubi Soft is bringing over a version of a free to play PC game? THQ is bring Darksiders 2 over. It's best selling original game franchise is Saints Row, and they just had a new one come out last year and have an expansion to that game coming out this fall. Did it ever occur to them to, I don't know, maybe bring THAT GAME over in a GOTY edition for Wii U?
This is the same shit that happened with the Wii. Rockstar brought a Bully port over, and fucking Manhunt 2 and wondered why it didn't sell. You could have expended LESS effort to made an upgraded port or collection of the old GTA games for Wii and sold a TON more.
This is the sort of logic that seems to escape these companies, then they wonder why their bottom line is atrocious. Look at last year, Sonic fits Nintendo systems like a glove - but they made a new Sonic game and it didn't even come out on Wii because apparently in it's design stage it wouldn't fit the power of the Wii. So you're telling me your design was so closed that you intentionally cut off your best selling version of the game and didn't have that in mind when you made it?
The lunacy just boggles the mind. It's amazing to me how horrible the planning is for these companies that they just need to move their fingers to make a successful game on the console, and instead they chop off their arm.
Maybe something more like Doom or Quake; heavily level-themed instead of linear setpiece-themed?I feel ya. I'd rather have something new and not along the lines of CoD or Battlefield myself.
Anyways, if I recall correctly Nintendo has stated that they want to leave those type of FPS to western third parties. If Retro ends up making a FPS title then it will probably be something along the lines of TimeSplitters 2 or Team Fortress 2, I would hope.
The MS exclusive deal with CoD ends this year, so Nintendo could try to jump in and grab the right away.
Maybe something more like Doom or Quake; heavily level-themed instead of linear setpiece-themed?
Fuck FPS, I'm hoping they're working on an FPA. Gimmie my open world FPA and I'll be content with just that one game for the entire generation.
Yes! I'd love a great, huge world to explore.. let me choose my skills, my outfit, my weapon. If they want to set it in 12AD, 1200AD, 1850AD, 1982AD, or 2350AD.. so be it!Fuck FPS, I'm hoping they're working on an FPA. Gimmie my open world FPA and I'll be content with just that one game for the entire generation.