• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Game Grumps (aka Egoraptor plays some games)

I kinda agree with JonTron on the Pokemon stuff. They really haven't evolved the game that much from the first generation. I mean jeeez they still haven't even made a big budget home console version, have they?. A Pokemon game with Xenoblade world building, exploration, and content would blow minds.

But what do I know, I stopped playing after Silver. I need moar guns in my gaimes nao.
 

mdtauk

Member
I don't understand Egoraptors love of playing the numbers game with Pokemon. I prefer the Zelda style of handling an increase of experience with updated abilities, updated items, etc.
 
I don't understand Egoraptors love of playing the numbers game with Pokemon. I prefer the Zelda style of handling an increase of experience with updated abilities, updated items, etc.
Why would you compare the two? They are both completely different game styles; it's possible to like both or neither.

A Pokemon game with Xenoblade world building, exploration, and content would blow minds.
Fans have wanted this so long it would never live up to any expectations.
 

mdtauk

Member
Why would you compare the two? They are both completely different game styles; it's possible to like both or neither...

Both are ways of building a character's experience and abilities. One abstracts the mathematics of damage delivered and effectiveness of the items/abilities. The other puts the numbers out there in plain sight. It is this method that is used by most RPGs which is why even though I love exploring, and narrative, and finding items, I can't bare playing RPGs.
 
Ok, so what? Other people can enjoy that experience though, to get back to your original post. While the similarities you describe may be there it makes for a fundamentally different game experience either way.
 

mdtauk

Member
Ok, so what? Other people can enjoy that experience though, to get back to your original post. While the similarities you describe may be there it makes for a fundamentally different game experience either way.

Well that's my point. I can't see the appeal of that kind of gameplay. I used the Zelda example to show a similar style of gameplay which I do like.
 

Riposte

Member
Ego says Pokemon is a "kid's game" and Jon says "it is the same game over and over", as if they were agreeing. If Pokemon wasn't a kid's game then it would be okay as it is now, because it is not actually the same game over and over.

When Ego says kid's game he is actually saying it is a game where the devs don't bother putting much strategy(challenge) in what is really a strategy game's campaign (maybe the post-game is interesting, I wouldn't really know). Common problem with (actual) JRPGs, almost universally to some degree. The list of changes they've made isn't going to be apparent when you can just mow the game down with one overleveled starter. It is this way because even the dumbest child must be able to complete it. When you care so little about the game's essential mechanics, why would notice the difference unconsciously?

The campaigns in these games, outside of the battle system, are not actually that one to one. The staples are there and the series lingers on a "generation" for more than one release, but anyone who say Red/Blue = Black/White isn't worth listening to. The larger point is that is doesn't matter because it is very boring. Red/Blue was/is also very boring. Pokemon's campaign is meant to be beaten by the dumbest of children and the charming mood they go for can only go so far. (That's not to even start on the topic that Pokemon is extremely anti-competitive. People have to hack it to make the game bearable.)

With that in mind and with Ego understanding why Pokemon's campaign sucks, I question why they are playing it in the first place... given how long it is too.

I don't understand Egoraptors love of playing the numbers game with Pokemon. I prefer the Zelda style of handling an increase of experience with updated abilities, updated items, etc.

Unless I missed it, he wasn't talking about experience points at all. In fact he avoids it when hacks. He is talking about how much he likes the turn-based tactics.
 
Pokémon is friggin' perfect the way it is right now. I wouldn't change a thing.

Also, I object to a mainline console-based game. The series should stay portable.
 

Riposte

Member
Pokémon is friggin' perfect the way it is right now. I wouldn't change a thing.

Also, I object to a mainline console-based game. The series should stay portable.

You don't want it to be harder? You wouldn't like it if Gym Battles were more like player vs player battles?
 

Riposte

Member
Grrrr this is a pet peeve of mine. Stories and single player games are not campaigns GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

When I say campaign, I mean it in the DnD sense... so I don't know what the problem is.
 
You don't want it to be harder? You wouldn't like it if Gym Battles were more like player vs player battles?

GameFreak can't make the games hard by default; that would alienate the target market. The Challenge Key is a step in the right direction, but it needs to be available from the start.
 
Well that's my point. I can't see the appeal of that kind of gameplay. I used the Zelda example to show a similar style of gameplay which I do like.
But mine is that they are similar only superficially; the core experience you are getting out of them is not due for apt comparison as to which is "better" because they are both attempting two different things.
Your generalisations about one abstracting the math of damage and the other putting them in plain sight completely misses the point on how these games are functioning from a gameplay level. One is turn based, the other is 'realtime' for starters. The meta game of collecting and training monsters via experience points has no similarity at all to the how one progresses through a Zelda game (I'm assuming you're comparing A Link to the Past here too).
 

mdtauk

Member
But mine is that they are similar only superficially; the core experience you are getting out of them is not due for apt comparison as to which is "better" because they are both attempting two different things.
Your generalisations about one abstracting the math of damage and the other putting them in plain sight completely misses the point on how these games are functioning from a gameplay level. One is turn based, the other is 'realtime' for starters. The meta game of collecting and training monsters via experience points has no similarity at all to the how one progresses through a Zelda game (I'm assuming you're comparing A Link to the Past here too).

But my point is even though both series feature exploring, and having the Character's abilities grow, I dislike Pokemon, Final Fantasy etc because it is turn based, and stat numbers are unobfuscated. But like Zelda where these same concepts exist, but are done in a different way.
 

Drago

Member
The Pokemon episodes are the best when they get stuff done. The ones where they literally do nothing like the last one aren't too good. Pokemon needs to be a 20-minute episode series
 

The Real Abed

Perma-Junior
The Pokemon episodes are the best when they get stuff done. The ones where they literally do nothing like the last one aren't too good. Pokemon needs to be a 20-minute episode series
They're the ones I care least about because nothing ever happens. I like the MegaMan episodes though.
 

blind51de

Banned
Geeze. Where did all the trolls come from suddenly?

Hey, I had no idea who Jontron was. I don't follow 99% of YT vloggers, there are too many to count even where videogames are concerned. He seems to be another guy who makes lots of noise to try and stand out.
I know of Egoraptor since he's not monotalented and has been around for many years.

And my suggestion that this is pretty much a money grab isn't any less valid.
 

Burnburn

Member
Hey, I had no idea who Jontron was. I don't follow 99% of YT vloggers, there are too many to count even where videogames are concerned. He seems to be another guy who makes lots of noise to try and stand out.
I know of Egoraptor since he's not monotalented and has been around for many years.

And my suggestion that this is pretty much a money grab isn't any less valid.

And you clearly still have no idea.
 

blind51de

Banned
Okay, then who is he and what is he about? (As pertaining to why I'd watch this if I weren't a fan of either him or Egoraptor).
 

The Real Abed

Perma-Junior
Money grab? I don't recall a single second of them asking for money. This isn't for money. It's for comedy. Both people are very talented and very funny. It is very sad you are not familiar with JonTron's stuff. It's really damn good. From his classic game reviews to his Sonic Team episodes to his modern reviews to his movie reviews.

Okay, then who is he and what is he about? (As pertaining to why I'd watch this if I weren't a fan of either him or Egoraptor).
There's such a thing as Googling for JonTron and watching some of his stuff yourself. It's really the easiest way to find out who he is and what he is about. If you still don't like him, that's fine. Just don't go stinking up a thread full of people who actually enjoy this stuff and want to talk about it.

So awesome. About time they finished... after the third? Fourth time against Pete? The montages were great. And their discussion of Mario and the 4th dimension.
 

Burnburn

Member
There's such a thing as Googling for JonTron and watching some of his stuff yourself. It's really the easiest way to find out who he is and what he is about. If you still don't like him, that's fine. Just don't go stinking up a thread full of people who actually enjoy this stuff and want to talk about it.
.
Or type in his name on Youtube. Now was that so hard?
 
"A PIRATE KIDNAPPING!"

Always, always gets me. I'm positive that if JonTron made it a point to say that in every Goof Troop episode, it would have been the greatest web series ever.
 

"About Beat in Slashman's stage... Did you catch him?"

"Yes."

"How?"

tumblr_m5hlqu2CEE1qex366o1_1280.jpg
 
The talk about Pokemon being too easy is depressing. The last Pokemon I played was Emerald (I think that's the one) and I just couldn't beat the two twin little girl gym leaders. None of the pokemon I had up to that point could stand a chance and I even went out to try to catch some that might fair better type-wise but the only ones I could find were underleveled. My only hope was to grind forever and I just didn't have it in me. Haven't played Pokemon since.
 

N4Us

Member
I could never really stand Egoraptor but I'm loving Game Grumps.

Playing Pokemon in videos like this though is a bad idea.
 

Kokonoe

Banned
I want to view their Pokemon video, but I wanna wait till I play the remake whenever.

Unless I can pinpoint a part in the video where they are discussing whatever they were discussing.
 

ZoddGutts

Member
Yeah, watching people play Pokemon isn't the funnest thing to see. I do like their dumb commentary, though not sure if I would want to watch them play the entire game though. Hope too see more co-op games, love Goof Troop play through. Maybe something like Final Fight because it has friendly hits, gonna be fun seeing them rage at each other.
 
Top Bottom