• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

SPOILER Bioshock Infinite SPOILER discussion

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
That might have been my favourite scene in the game. The vendor not knowing what he was doing and the violinist stops playing once he sees you as well as the woman confronting Elizabeth. The whole ambush was telegraphed beautifully.

btw this just convinced me to start replaying the game, i glossed over way too much cool stuff.
 

pakkit

Banned
"After You've Gone" by Ella Fitzgerald (another musical anachronism) playing while you're looking at the pictures of Liz in the dark room. Those lyrics...
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
The person who made this is a genius.

The Lutece's alter accordingly as they go.

In one reality, Booker is killed in the lighthouse by the lighthouse keeper. He is then killed to stop that from happening.

In another, he is killed during the raffle for being the False Shepard (thus Lutece warning him not to pick #77).

Gosh, the plot thickens.

awesome, this ties up a few more things

- who the dead guy in the lighthouse was

- why there was a message on the door
 

Salsa

Member
Mh, this is weird tho:

iryVlbRM9nl22.PNG


as far as we know, no he doesnt. New York burns much later when he's dead and Elizabeth's older. She's the one that burns it.

now it makes me wonder how that image Booker sees is explained..
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
Mh, this is weird tho:

iryVlbRM9nl22.PNG


as far as we know, no he doesnt. New York burns much later when he's dead and Elizabeth's older. She's the one that burns it.

now it makes me wonder how that image Booker sees is explained..

well you can see tears of a future, right?
 

Sorian

Banned
Mh, this is weird tho:

iryVlbRM9nl22.PNG


as far as we know, no he doesnt. New York burns much later when he's dead and Elizabeth's older. She's the one that burns it.

now it makes me wonder how that image Booker sees is explained..

Comstock does see New York burning through one of the tears, thats where his prophecy came from
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
I was constantly thinking about that during the game waiting on a payoff but then I totally forgot

i realized you could chock every odd moment up to the lucetes guiding you in the right direction. i have a hard time believing that that was the most optimal course of action to dewitt blowing up the siphon though. maybe it wasnt though, maybe it was just good enough.
 

Sorian

Banned
i realized you could chock every odd moment up to the lucetes guiding you in the right direction. i have a hard time believing that that was the most optimal course of action to dewitt blowing up the siphon though. maybe it wasnt though, maybe it was just good enough.

They didn't care about optimal, they just cared about results. When something didn't work, they just did something else.
 

pakkit

Banned
Mh, this is weird tho:

iryVlbRM9nl22.PNG


as far as we know, no he doesnt. New York burns much later when he's dead and Elizabeth's older. She's the one that burns it.

now it makes me wonder how that image Booker sees is explained..
Remember the dead soldiers that can sense being murdered in an alternate universe? In the same way, Comstock's visions have bled over to Booker. He sees the same prophecies.
 

Sorian

Banned
Booker just piles higher and deeper, doesn't he?

"How can I ever make it up to my sweet daughter for selling her off to repay my gambling debt? I believe a hot dicking is in order!"

Except I guess Comstock wouldn't use that logic because he didnt have the gambling problem but whatever.
 

Gorillaz

Member
One thing that kind of surprised me was how much they moved away from "America is better then you so deal with it" to "God or die"

The city itself was full of American valves in 1912 but it honestly didn't seem like what Ken mentioned years back. So I'm wondering how much changed in development.
 
Mh, this is weird tho:

iryVlbRM9nl22.PNG


as far as we know, no he doesnt. New York burns much later when he's dead and Elizabeth's older. She's the one that burns it.

now it makes me wonder how that image Booker sees is explained..

But Comstock does see this in the form of a "prophecy" ,aka a tear. Maybe thats how also Booker remembers.
 

Salsa

Member
I dunno, seeing her in the dress and having the door recognize her as Lady Comstock just made me wonder.

I thought about this too, but then I realized that Elizabeth was supposed to be the new Comstock anyway so it's no wonder she would have access to Comstock house and such.

Just maybe not that early while she was supposed to still be "caged"

could be anything tho

Remember the dead soldiers that can sense being murdered in an alternate universe? In the same way, Comstock's visions have bled over to Booker. He sees the same prophecies.

yeah I know that, just totally forgot about Comstock literally seeing that through a tear.
 
Any possibility Lady Comstock IS Elizabeth in any dimension?

I don't think so. Lady Comstock has no conneciton to Elizabeth at all that isn't propoganda. Elizabeth thought that Lady Comstock was her mother and abandoned her which was why she was so angry at her (but in fact her mother died at child birth as we were led to believe). Lady Comstock thought that Elizabeth was Rosalind Lutece's and Comstock's daugher but this wasn't possible as Comstock was sterile through the use of the tears (ironically though, Comstock actually asked for an affair according to one of her Voxaphones but was declined). The truth was explained to Lady Comstock but knowing of Comstock's murders and his lies she viewed him as a 'monster' and could only offer him forgiveness, not silence as he wanted (at which point he murdered her and Fitzroy was blamed). If you completely remove Lady Comstock, Elizabeth would still exist. If there wasn't always constants it would be possible in a universe but those constants (and we don't actually know what they all are; the coin is one, the rowing, the existence of a lighthouse and founder another, but there could be more. Maybe the baptism isn't even a constant and that explains the ending, it didn't work because they didn't identify the correct constant but personally, I doubt that]).

EDIT: Actually what BlastProcessing said is much better and has a much greater dramatic irony.
 
I kind of want to play the game again to see all the nods, then again, I'm pretty sure I don't want to lol

Movies are easy to re-watch. Games, not so much

It kind of makes sense now why HE DOESN'T ROW?

They're probably sick of rowing but it's become well established that Booker is a dick and doesn't want to help.
 

Salsa

Member
Movies are easy to re-watch. Games, not so much

this game is so tailored towards experiencing it again with aditional info that not playing it a second time almost seem like a disservice


so glad I didnt went with Hard instead of 1999 mode on my first run. Almost went all in. Leaving another layer of incentive was the thing to do.
 

Sorian

Banned
this game is so tailored towards experiencing it again with aditional info that not playing it a second time almost seem like a disservice


so glad I didnt went with Hard instead of 1999 mode on my first run. Almost went all in. Leaving another layer of incentive was the thing to do.

When I do my second play through, I'll go easy just so I can enjoy all the nods.
 
Certainly explains the monotony of their tone; they've done this hundreds of times.

One hundred and twenty two (previous) times (this is the one hundred and twenty third) according to the chalkboard at the "Heads, or tails?" segment (the coin flip is a constant, each time they add a dash) but I have to think that seems far too low to get everything perfect (unless they aren't counting some events). This also goes back to the bar (presumably). The result of the shield is a variable. Sometimes Booker dies there and sometimes it works. Another NPC mentions that they prefer to not get new Vigors so Fink can remove any errors.

In the Booker-verse his wife dies in childbirth. In the Comstock-verse there is no childbirth to kill her. I assumed that they are the same woman in each verse. This explains why they look alike.

Very good catch. That makes there an even greater irony in her refusal of the miracle birth. That seems very likely I would think.
 

Sblargh

Banned
When I do my second play through, I'll go easy just so I can enjoy all the nods.

Nah, the game is very good at stopping with nods to getting into action and vice-versa. When you fight, you only fight. When you walk around, you only walk around.
 
I dunno, seeing her in the dress and having the door recognize her as Lady Comstock just made me wonder.

In the Booker-verse his wife dies in childbirth. In the Comstock-verse there is no childbirth to kill her. I assumed that they are the same woman in each verse. This explains why they look alike.

One hundred and twenty two (previous) times (this is the one hundred and twenty third) according to the chalkboard at the "Heads, or tails?" segment (the coin flip is a constant, each time they add a dash) but I have to think that seems far too low to get everything perfect (unless they aren't counting some events). This also goes back to the bar (presumably). The result of the shield is a variable. Sometimes Booker dies there and sometimes it works. Another NPC mentions that they prefer to not get new Vigors so Fink can remove any errors.

At least 122 times. It is possible that they have been at it much longer until they got bored enough to start tracking coin flips.
 

Alienous

Member
One hundred and twenty two (previous) times (this is the one hundred and twenty third) according to the chalkboard at the "Heads, or tails?" segment (the coin flip is a constant, each time they add a dash) but I have to think that seems far too low to get everything perfect (unless they aren't counting some events). This also goes back to the bar (presumably). The result of the shield is a variable. Sometimes Booker dies there and sometimes it works. Another NPC mentions that they prefer to not get new Vigors so Fink can remove any errors.

Yeah, I assume that's the number of Booker's that even survive their first encounter with Songbird.
 

Zia

Member
I have a lot to say about this game that I'm saving for elsewhere (sorrs), but it's an existential science fiction masterpiece. Having just finished it, I have to scoff at the Inception comparisons -- it's way smarter than that, more Chris Marker than Chris Nolan and what every single person crafting narratively-driven games needs to aspire to.
 
One thing that kind of surprised me was how much they moved away from "America is better then you so deal with it" to "God or die"

The city itself was full of American valves in 1912 but it honestly didn't seem like what Ken mentioned years back. So I'm wondering how much changed in development.
Looking at the initial gameplay trailer in 2010 (man that feels like eons ago now), it seems like you were originally going to fight against different sub-leaders of the different wards of Columbia. That Saltonstall guy giving a speech to an audience of nobody was apparently the councilman of Ward 6. The art book goes even further back and it seems like it was basically going to be the original Bioshock in the sky, if the mutated splicer-like enemies and generally 'creepier' looking settings from that period of development are anything to go off. Honestly as much as I liked the horror aspects of Bio1 I'm glad they moved away from that. Despite the literal connections to Rapture Infinite still feels very much like its own game.

Also just a theory but since Songbird seemed so out of place with the rest of Columbia's aesthetics, part of me is wondering due to the obvious Big Daddy parallels if the technology Fink used to create him was literally taken from Rapture.
 

Sblargh

Banned
This talk about doors got me to another mindfuck.

Remember how the bathspheres on Bioshock 1 are set to only respond to people on the genetic ballpark of Ryan and his inner circle? Yeah, so, you use them anyway.
 
Top Bottom