• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

TRUTHFACT: MS having eSRAM yield problems on Xbox One

Status
Not open for further replies.

chadskin

Member
I'd guess MS probably just looked at Sony's strong 1st/2nd party PS3 lineup for the end of the year and assumed that that meant Sony wouldn't be releasing until 2014, and aligned their chips accordingly. I'd hope they're not that dumb, but they do seem to have been resting on their laurels for a little bit now.

MS and Sony surely have good relationships with multiplat companies and I'm certain they are constantly talking back and forth about the other one's console. It's no surprise they both ended up pretty much similiar in terms of hardware. MS is just a mess these days (see: Windows 8, Windows Phone 8, Surface, ... )
 

Perkel

Banned
Sounds like it is panning out to be even worse than I first thought late last night.

what a day

This whole fiasco is actually bad news for gamers as a whole. This isnt going to stop the casual crowd from buying the X1 at all. Might be enough to keep them from being in 1st place, but it wont keep them from being at least a close second.

So for us as gamers that means games designed to run on the machine that is the lowest common denominator. I only game on PC and it will even impact us PC gamers. This sucks.

Yeah in nutshell. No one "wins". Everybody will lose.
 
Can't believe they didn't have a plan B considering they knew they were going to have terrible yields last year, and had no certainty they could resolve them in time.

They rather launch this mess now, just so this mess is really cheap to make two years from now.
 

Knoxcore

Member
Microsoft's in a very tricky situation here. If these rumours are true and they're having major issues, the responsible thing to do would be to delay the damn thing until you sort it out. Rushing the 360 led to the RROD issue and a $1B price-tag, and the end result wasn't a major lead but a dead heat. With all the bad PR they're getting already, I don't think they want to add production delays, downgrading, and (potentially) broken consoles to the mix.

I agree. I don't think a delay will be detrimental to MS. The Xbox brand is still very much alive and well. A six-month delay with a launch in the Spring of 2014 won't be so bad. Sony launched a full year later than the 360 at a $100 premium and still managed to get to parity with the 360 in terms of lifetime sales. Delaying will ensure any manufacturing defects are minimized and developers can produce a decent lineup of games.
 

JaggedSac

Member
Can't believe they didn't have a plan B considering they knew they were going to have terrible yields last year, and had no certainty they could resolve them in time.

They rather launch this mess now, just so this mess is really cheap to make two years from now.

Crazy to think things snuck up on them after such a long generation. It really is a "wtf".
 

Minions

Member
This whole fiasco is actually bad news for gamers as a whole. This isnt going to stop the casual crowd from buying the X1 at all. Might be enough to keep them from being in 1st place, but it wont keep them from being at least a close second.

So for us as gamers that means games designed to run on the machine that is the lowest common denominator. I only game on PC and it will even impact us PC gamers. This sucks.

They could focus on the PS4 and down port. The xbox is the harder to port for afterall due to ESRAM management. It will likely be easier to program for the PS4's unified ram then modify it to work with the esram than doing the reverse.

Double flops can still mean much better fps, (even 60 fps games) vs 30 fps games. Does not take much to tweak things to look substantially better on the PS4. Look at what a few checkboxes can do on the PC.
 
ucan remo.ve RUMUR frmo hte thread tittle TEAMMOD. esram yieldls. are "troubling"toput it lightly.

truthfact.


btw youiw lil not njhear abouthing about tech atMS E3 presentation. tech tarbaby (notracistst!) IS TSTICKIER THAN YOU WIL EVER KNOW. I LOOK FORWARF TO READING THE BOOK BY VENTUREBEAT.

theyMSrushed. --caughtoutbysonychangs. leadershitfailure.p.


No disrespect but seriously? Translation please

Source?
 

Gorillaz

Member
^ No Spring Launch. Not in the states that is suicidal


Either do it this holiday Season or Christmas 2014. They won't let the PS4 have a holiday to itself
 
Can't believe they didn't have a plan B considering they knew they were going to have terrible yields last year, and had no certainty they could resolve them in time.

They rather launch this mess now, just so this mess is really cheap to make two years from now.

Well if the yields were bad last year, they would've had time to respin, unless the respin didn't go well. Without knowing their stages of manufacturing, it literally is impossible for us to understand the decisions that were made.

Other issue is TSMC is just having crappy yield problems again, and not much MSFT could've done since a FAB would've been tooled for their chip, and finding another FAB would be nigh impossible now.
 

Sydle

Member
I don't care how powerful it is, so downclock if necessary and I'll still buy, but I'm not going through RROD 2.
 

tesla246

Member
Altough games are what matters most, hardware is also very important in the sense that its gonna affect every (multiplatform) game I buy in the future for the next 5-7 years (my pc is not that good...to say the least). Ps 4 is just infinitely more appealing as of now, and I prefer to only have 1 console (already bought wii u). However, I might make an exception and buy a ps4 if money allows it.
That said, I am curious about the launch price of both the x1 and ps4.

Slightly more ontopic, I am quite baffled how microsoft was so badly caught off guard by the competition. I mean, they launched first with 360 nearly 8 (!) Years ago. And their precence on 360 has been dwindling since the last 2 years so I assumed they were working night and day on the successor already. Werent they continually researching future tech like everyone else onwards the launch of a new console? If you'd ask me 2 years ago I wouldve said microsoft was in a better position to launch a new console coming from the massively succesful 360 than sony, who were, certainly the first two years since the launch of the ps3, struggling.

Surprising how some things turn out, although this outcome as of now may have quite complex reasons.
 

Draft

Member
So now that the Xbone and WiiU are comparable specs wise does that make the PS4 this generation's Wii? Bad news for third party support.
 
ucan remo.ve RUMUR frmo hte thread tittle TEAMMOD. esram yieldls. are "troubling"toput it lightly.

truthfact.


btw youiw lil not njhear abouthing about tech atMS E3 presentation. tech tarbaby (notracistst!) IS TSTICKIER THAN YOU WIL EVER KNOW. I LOOK FORWARF TO READING THE BOOK BY VENTUREBEAT.

theyMSrushed. --caughtoutbysonychangs. leadershitfailure.p.
Getting to some Deep Throat level shit here, lol.

Leadershitfailure FTL.
 

fred

Member
Microsoft's in a very tricky situation here. If these rumours are true and they're having major issues, the responsible thing to do would be to delay the damn thing until you sort it out. Rushing the 360 led to the RROD issue and a $1B price-tag, and the end result wasn't a major lead but a dead heat. With all the bad PR they're getting already, I don't think they want to add production delays, downgrading, and (potentially) broken consoles to the mix.

I've always been interested to see the REAL installed userbase figures. I know a few people that have bought as many as 3 x 360s due to hardware failure. As far as I can see the 360 is in a distant third place, and has been for a while. Aren't the stats something like a 1 in 3 failure rate or something..?
 
This whole fiasco is actually bad news for gamers as a whole. This isnt going to stop the casual crowd from buying the X1 at all.
You really think the casual crowd is going to care that much about all this watch TV on your TV shit? To the point that they'd buy a graphically inferior yet for all we know similarly priced console? Oh and make no mistake, the graphically inferior reputation will make it to the casuals if its as bad as this thread makes it out to be.
 

chadskin

Member
So for us as gamers that means games designed to run on the machine that is the lowest common denominator. I only game on PC and it will even impact us PC gamers. This sucks.

Well, the 360 was the lead platform because the PS3 was hard to code for and came out a year later. This time around the PS4 could very well be the lead platform getting the best graphics while the Xboner could get a 720p/60fps version with less details and stuff. Toning down graphics is pretty easy as PC games usually support a wide array of configs too.

That's just common sense on my side though, we'll see how it turns out.
 

Perkel

Banned
Xbone

From this:

DSCF0046.JPG

to this:

 

sn00zer

Member
Does this mean downgraded multiplatform games?
By that I mean downgraded for both PS4 and XB1 versions...similar to how PC is held back by consoles
 
Casuals don't buy 400$/E consoles at launch. Casuals aren't like "Oh look at that, the new Xbox. Sure I will fork over 470$ this month on this videogame console, why not?".

MS is playing around with their hardcore fan base like they had no care in the world, and that's simply because the people making decisions don't understand how a core fan base works at all. The ones who did got replaced, and now this is just another MS product.

Dems the breaks
 
The generation before the last was unilaterally dominated by Sony and was one of the best generations in gaming history.

Sony didn't give a shit about 3rd party content filtering, just don't forget the royalty checks.

Sony didn't give a shit about what you have the balls to bring over from Japan or vice versa, just don't forget the royalty checks.

Sony didn't care about any crazy accessories or 3rd party hardware someone wanted to make, just don't forget the royalty checks.

It was the most egalitarian period in this industry's history and a single 120M plus user console to focus on led to some big software risks (which I think paid off handsomely). An HD version of that with x86 hardware and small studio self publishing sounds like my kind of games industry.

In terms of games it was great, in terms of everything else like Europe waiting months for games sometimes and a general disregard towards Europe as an important region is something I can't forget.

Not to mention what happened with the PS3 was a direct response to the overwhelming dominance they had with the PS2 and that's what I was really referring to. Any one company dominating leads to them becoming overly arrogant and taking their fanbase and the gamer in general for granted.

That's what I'd want to avoid because no-one realistically wants a return to those bad days leading up to the PS3 launch.
 
I come back to the thread and see that CBOAT has posted and in doing so destroys any hope of MS actually not being further buried in the preverbial shite

Wow
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom