So I stopped looking at the thread after cboat first posted. Anything new?!
Other than the Albert penello posts(Of which the main one is in the OP)? Nope not really.
So I stopped looking at the thread after cboat first posted. Anything new?!
So I stopped looking at the thread after cboat first posted. Anything new?!
FYI it's 11pm on a Sunday, so people aren't exactly quick to respond to work email. I wanted to check in before I shut-down for the evening. This is what I believe is going on:
We still have two more weeks before launch - the console is in a pre-release state. We are doing regular updates - I personally took one a few minutes before he posted. His build is now old. This is why we were saying we didn't want people on early - it's not done yet.
This behavior is only because we are in pre-release. When we launch, console will work exactly as you expect today on 360.
For sure this has nothing to do with requiring a connection. There is no "DRM removal" in the Day One update because none of the consoles were ever built with that stuff in it.
This also has nothing to do with COD. The Day One update just brings the SW up to date with the latest versions vs. what's on the box. But there is no 24 check in, that's for sure.
Other than the Albert penello posts(Of which the main one is in the OP)? Nope not really.
FYI it's 11pm on a Sunday, so people aren't exactly quick to respond to work email. I wanted to check in before I shut-down for the evening. This is what I believe is going on:
We still have two more weeks before launch - the console is in a pre-release state. We are doing regular updates - I personally took one a few minutes before he posted. His build is now old. This is why we were saying we didn't want people on early - it's not done yet.
This behavior is only because we are in pre-release. When we launch, console will work exactly as you expect today on 360.
For sure this has nothing to do with requiring a connection. There is no "DRM removal" in the Day One update because none of the consoles were ever built with that stuff in it.
This also has nothing to do with COD. The Day One update just brings the SW up to date with the latest versions vs. what's on the box. But there is no 24 check in, that's for sure.
None of that explains why he can't play offline.
As you said, you're just "guessing" because you don't really know.
We're going in circles here.None of that explains why he can't play offline.
As you said, you're just "guessing" because you don't really know.
The question is can Microsoft remotely disable hardware? (Not just ban you from LIVE, but turn your $500 piece of sexy console hardware into a non-working paper weight because of X).
You could still play games offline with a banned 360 and access settings and such. A console ban is just to ensure that even if you made a new Gamertag on that system you would not be able to connect to XBL.Couldn't Microsoft ban your console (not only your Live account, the whole console) even in this gen?
None of that explains why he can't play offline.
As you said, you're just "guessing" because you don't really know.
Couldn't Microsoft ban your console (not only your Live account, the whole console) even in this gen?
One thing that doesn't make sense is the news articles earlier said that users wont be able to do ANYTHING without downloading the day one patch ... so how did the guy who got the the Xbox early go through all the menus and play games if he didn't even get the patch?
One thing that doesn't make sense is the news articles earlier said that users wont be able to do ANYTHING without downloading the day one patch ... so how did the guy who got the the Xbox early go through all the menus and play games if he didn't even get the patch?
If this still hasn't been confirmed, then I'm going to lean towards it not being because of a nightly build. I mean, why would a console just stop working because it doesn't have the latest software? That seems like a really weird security feature to build in.
And yet everyone thinks they're a butcher...This thread is the perfect example of "you don't want to see how the sausage gets made"
It makes full sense, that way you force everyone to be in the latest version, remember that the nightly is not for the general public, but for devs and beta testers.
In that case, you'd think someone around here (a dev) would be able to 100% confirm that, no? Or would dev's building games not be using the same code, since they'd be on dev kits?
There is no way in hell I'd buy the Xbox One on day one. I predict there's going to be so much stuff that is discovered/leaks out after launch that there are going to be some truly disgusted Xbox One owners.
I'm not sure exactly but wasn't his ban just for posting a bunch of videos and whatnot? Would he have been banned had he kept it to himself?
Phones and Tablets have cellular modems. They only require a signal to activate.The OP is a good start...it's been updated twice and even has a funny ass joke.
Many devices these days (phones, tablets, set top boxes) are required to phone home before activation. Only on a video game forum do we pretend that it is a sign of the Apocalypse.
There is no way in hell I'd buy the Xbox One on day one. I predict there's going to be so much stuff that is discovered/leaks out after launch that there are going to be some truly disgusted Xbox One owners.
The OP is a good start...it's been updated twice and even has a funny ass joke.
Many devices these days (phones, tablets, set top boxes) are required to phone home before activation. Only on a video game forum do we pretend that it is a sign of the Apocalypse.
I did look at them. I saw both updates. But my point, which was ignored and snarked at, was the guy has a system and a physical game. He cannot play that physical game. Why? I would expect you can play it. Shouldn't have to need to do anything. It should work.
The OP implies there is no DRM and the updates don't remove anything. So, it should work. I asked about a summary because those that responded to me suggested I was wrong for blaming MS. This sounds like a technical flaw. They probably will rectify it but I'm not okay with them doing it.
Also, those devices that phone home, are useless to people that can't phone home. Just because your cell phone does it, on a device capable of doing it, doesn't make it right. The question is, what about the people that can't connect to the internet? Or am I missing something?
Penello did and devs won't because of NDAs.In that case, you'd think someone around here (a dev) would be able to 100% confirm that, no? Or would dev's building games not be using the same code, since they'd be on dev kits?
So all of these other systems in the wild and nobody else is has been banned. On top of that no one else has reported that the OS updated itself to the new build since the old one expired. You would think that we would have heard something, anything. It is strange indeed.
I believe, but I can understand why reasonable people would not trust the explanation given.Who knows man. I find it kind of odd that everybody just accepted the whole new patch that completely locks him out of everything claim. A new patch just happened to come out a day after he was banned. The OS he had previously downloaded had an expiration date or some way of knowing there was a new patch that he couldn't get due to being banned. Sounds too convienent. MS will probably get it worked out by launch and most people won't have problems but I don't trust them
This is something I'm willing to give MS the benefit of the doubt. Sounds like it could be related to pre-launch issues... but he does have the day 1 patch already and he is trying to play offline. It doesn't make sense but I think someone goofed and I think this issue will be corrected by launch. I think. Perhaps glitch in OS?
I believe, but I can understand why reasonable people would not trust the explanation given.
Who knows man. I find it kind of odd that everybody just accepted the whole new patch that completely locks him out of everything claim. A new patch just happened to come out a day after he was banned. The OS he had previously downloaded had an expiration date or some way of knowing there was a new patch that he couldn't get due to being banned. Sounds too convienent. MS will probably get it worked out by launch and most people won't have problems but I don't trust them
Day One Patch not out yet, and of course individual titles have the ability to require online DRM, just as they do today (see Bionic Commando Rearmed on PS3), not that Ghosts is doing that. Nothing to see here.
Still find myself curious as to -exactly- what Cboat was on about, but I agree.
I also can't wait til it drops, so we can end all the conspiracy nonsense.I for one cant wait until this system is finally out so we can stop with the "just wait till it is out" bs. That seems to be the crux of people's problem. They dont want to wait until they already dropped $500+ on something that has had the most mixed and shady information ever released with new possible bombs dropped on a daily basis from both camps. Considering the guy who got his console banned pre-ordered 4 days before he received it and those shots of 100s of PS4s sitting around in Target I have a feeling that by Black Friday with some diligence anyone who really wants these systems will be able to get one. I am glad I decided to wait and see, I am normally there day one. Should be interesting to say the least.
It's pretty much been confirmed to death and back.Has it occurred to anyone that the "Day 1" patch he has downloaded is not the finished Day 1 patch at all and is still being worked on by MS? Would also confirm why they don't want him online until it is available - understandable.
I also can't wait til it drops, so we can end all the conspiracy nonsense.
It's pretty much been confirmed to death and back.
Penello. See OP.By MS? Where?
Those days have never gone. Just set your options to auto-boot game. It's only XBone that has this problem.Anybody else miss the days when you didn't even notice the console's OS? If you got an early SNES and dropped a game into that thing it just fucking worked. Getting tired of all these last minute software scrambles.
Those days have never gone. Just set your options to auto-boot game. It's only XBone that has this problem.
This is something I'm willing to give MS the benefit of the doubt. Sounds like it could be related to pre-launch issues... but he does have the day 1 patch already and he is trying to play offline. It doesn't make sense but I think someone goofed and I think this issue will be corrected by launch. I think. Perhaps glitch in OS?
Penello. See OP.