So you didn't read my post, gotcha.
This 'elitism' is often exaggerated and tends to be tossed around anytime PC gamers start stating facts that make console gamers uncomfortable. Its not that they don't exist, its that people around here far too often take people being informative and enthusiastic as being condescending and 'elitist'.
it's also an inherently different beast of fanboydom.
PC gaming does has its equivalent of proprietary cheer-leading console fanboys, but they largely dwell in the darkest depths of B3D or anandtech boards, crusading in the name of whichever part manufacturer they've chosen to ally themselves with. nvidia vs. AMD arguments in those places can make console wars look like gentlemanly skirmish.
but to be a fan of open platform hardware is something else entirely.
a sony fan is going to be a sony fan. they're going to be singing the praises of the one hardware specification that sony has chosen for them, they're going to push the few exclusive titles sony studios are cooking up and they're going to be evangelising whatever proprietary features sony has deemed necessary to include in their software.
a fan of open platform hardware has no such binds. there are certain custodians and gatekeepers, but the core principle is one of preference.
when a person is trying to argue the case for buying a particular console, they are arguing that you buy a set standard from a single platform holder and pay penance to them with every transaction.
when a person is trying to argue the case for buying "a PC", there is no sole proprietary beneficiary which they are doing the legwork for and spec recommendation threads are the purest form of meritocracy you'll find in this industry.
it's this element of preference which results in so many converts coming and singing the PC's praises with perhaps excessive fervor. of course they're going to be impressed, they're cheating, they personally tailored their whole gaming experience to exactly what they wanted.