It means something in regards to the context of the post he was responding to.
That's the past.
I'm thinking long term. Big plans. Hold on.
It means something in regards to the context of the post he was responding to.
Gaming companies aren't making these content ID claims, otherwise we'd see more instances of big developers/publishers showing up as the claimant.
What's happening is everyone is getting claimed by completely irrelevant companies.
YouTube must have flipped a switch or something.
Did you enjoy your freedom?
Well, it is gone now.
The internet is here to make you a corporate bitch.
Could someone please explain to me how, as a viewer, this will effect, say, me watching a Let's Play video or something? I'm somewhat confused regarding this ContentID thing.
So people like PewDiePoop will no longer make millions of dollars? I'm okay with this.
There will always be people willing to do let's plays for free, and the proper channels like Giant Bomb will have deals with the publishers anyway.
I understand that. So I understand that making money off someone's intellectual property that you didn't create, don't own and have no rights to use, isn't right.
Update on radbrad's tweets:
Is it only people who monetize videos?
Because none of my videos are monetized, and I've not had any problems.
Yes just monetized ones as mine are also free from said hassle.
OK, then should publishers go after IGN, Gametrailers, etc next? They do put ads up right next to assets that they post straight as they got it from PR reps.
I mean, they're making money off of someone else's IP. That's pretty much the entire business model of a gaming site. Scummy, right?
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/
so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.
It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.
Yes, but it's unreasonable to be angry at Google/YouTube for doing what they're legally required to do.
Google doesn't make copyright law, and they don't own the IP in question.
They have licenses for that, just as they have licenses for musicians who want to sell their covers of other people's songs.
They have licenses for that, just as they have licenses for musicians who want to sell their covers of other people's songs.
So if I own an IP of any sort, someone else should be able to use it and profit from it without my permission/giving me royalties because "that's how they make money"?
If you owned the IP would you be singing the same tune? What if royalites are how you "fed your family"
Get real man.
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/
so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.
It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.
People no longer making gaming videos on youtube (be it a Let's Play, a review, news etc) unless they are already one of the biggest channels in a network (like Maker, machinima ect) or they only doing it part time (and thus not many videos) due to working an other job (and thus do not have to make a living off youtube).
People keep saying this. Do they actually have licenses, or is this just assumed? I've never once seen any of the sites mention it.
Being right without being legal means jack shit.
The fight needs to happen that makes what you believe is right, to also be what is legal.
I don't understand the complaints as the people complaining about it are clearly the ones who made mistakes when figuring out how to monetize their work.
It's not necessarily music he added. Remember that a lot of these entities will also pick up tiny little bits of licensed music in-game, sometimes even sound effects.
I live in the UK, my porn will soon be gone too ;_;
And what about the hundreds of other gaming related channels (which are good) that get destroyed in the process? Hardly a good thing, especially if you like the channels and their video content.Yes, this is a good thing! I hope guys like PewDieShit get destroyed!
Actually, as a matter of fact, royalties are exactly were my livelihood comes from. I've had people use my music in videos, and I've had people steal my music to try and resell it. The latter is when I took action.
I'm not understanding the snarky way you're responding to me, like you're happy that these people may go broke.
Pretty much.End of a goddamn era.
Is this stuff all happening to coincide with how much easier it is to record,upload and share next gen footage now? and try nip that before it gets out of control later in the gen? or do you think it's just a coincidence?
Is this stuff all happening to coincide with how much easier it is to record,upload and share next gen footage now? and try nip that before it gets out of control later in the gen? or do you think it's just a coincidence?
That's not true at all. SOME videos are being claimed by irrelevant companies. The vast bulk of what we've seen have been issue by actual game companies, hence all the complains about Nintendo
I don't understand why people think they should be allowed to make money off copyrighted content.
I made guitar covers for years on YouTube and it's been a constant battle. The song is copyrighted, even if I'm doing a cover (and I'm not trying to monetize!)
These gaming videos aren't covers or anything, they're literally the equivalent of me uploading a song and then being annoyed that one, it gets taken down, and two, that I can't make money off somebody else's song.
Here we go!
So, by coincident, every gaming channel all receive content ID claims on the exact same day?
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/
so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.
It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.
It's not a coincidence. YouTube rolled out a new ContentID algorithm which is catching far more than the previous one.
It's not a coincidence. YouTube rolled out a new ContentID algorithm which is catching far more than the previous one.
You really need to separate the story in a game from the actual playing the game part.
What you said is the definition of privacy. I'm sorry but I don't vicariously play the game through whatever esport player I'm watching.
Nah, the writing was on the wall for this the day that you saw someone seriously say "I'll just watch this game on Youtube".
Right, but this must have something to do with the "affiliate" announcement a few days ago.
So is this some mistake where copyright claims have caught up lets plays or is it really publishers going after these channels?
I'm amused by all of these comments that are saying 'we'll just move to Dailymotion/Vimeo/<some other site>!' All that will happen is that the copyright claims now going to Youtube will go to the new site, and that site will either cave and pull down/flag/monetize videos for the claimant, or they'll ignore the complaints, get sued, taken to court and shut down. I'm sure that YouTube would love to have as many LP videos on their site as possible (content is content, and LP viewers are seeing ads). It's the threat of litigation, not some malice on the part of Google, that's to blame here.