• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Massive Gaming YouTube Channels Getting 100s of Flagged Videos Continuously

Gaming companies aren't making these content ID claims, otherwise we'd see more instances of big developers/publishers showing up as the claimant.

What's happening is everyone is getting claimed by completely irrelevant companies.

YouTube must have flipped a switch or something.

That's not true at all. SOME videos are being claimed by irrelevant companies. The vast bulk of what we've seen have been issue by actual game companies, hence all the complains about Nintendo
 

TheD

The Detective
Could someone please explain to me how, as a viewer, this will effect, say, me watching a Let's Play video or something? I'm somewhat confused regarding this ContentID thing.

People no longer making gaming videos on youtube (be it a Let's Play, a review, news etc) unless they are already one of the biggest channels in a network (like Maker, machinima ect) or they only doing it part time (and thus not many videos) due to working an other job (and thus do not have to make a living off youtube).
 

holland666

Member
So people like PewDiePoop will no longer make millions of dollars? I'm okay with this.

There will always be people willing to do let's plays for free, and the proper channels like Giant Bomb will have deals with the publishers anyway.

Yes, this is a good thing! I hope guys like PewDieShit get destroyed!
 

Lost Fragment

Obsessed with 4chan
I understand that. So I understand that making money off someone's intellectual property that you didn't create, don't own and have no rights to use, isn't right.

OK, then should publishers go after IGN, Gametrailers, etc next? They do put ads up right next to assets that they post straight as they got it from PR reps.

I mean, they're making money off of someone else's IP. That's pretty much the entire business model of a gaming site. Scummy, right?
 
Update on radbrad's tweets:

0efbf01e95141f3d8ce105d7c12ac5c2.png

IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/

so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.

It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.
 

snap0212

Member
I guess this will change how gamers on YouTube make money. It's awesome that many are able to do what they love and make money by doing it, but not having figure out everything beforehand and then complaining rubs me the wrong way.

There are literally only two options here: the way you make money is fine and dandy and you have all the rights to do what you do or you don't and have to live with the consequences. Sorry, but if you're someone making a business with a parter like YouTube who doesn't protect you at all (and flagging vids is nothing new at all) then you have to take your business elsewhere. I don't understand the complaints as the people complaining about it are clearly the ones who made mistakes when figuring out how to monetize their work.

Edit: If people have the rights to use the content and have a contract with YouTube then I don't see how this isn't something that will be resolved quickly.
 
OK, then should publishers go after IGN, Gametrailers, etc next? They do put ads up right next to assets that they post straight as they got it from PR reps.

I mean, they're making money off of someone else's IP. That's pretty much the entire business model of a gaming site. Scummy, right?

They have licenses for that, just as they have licenses for musicians who want to sell their covers of other people's songs.
 

Orayn

Member
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/

so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.

It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.

It's not necessarily music he added. Remember that a lot of these entities will also pick up tiny little bits of licensed music in-game, sometimes even sound effects.
 

Lost Fragment

Obsessed with 4chan
Yes, but it's unreasonable to be angry at Google/YouTube for doing what they're legally required to do.

Google doesn't make copyright law, and they don't own the IP in question.

I don't think they're required to do so in the most clusterfucky way possible.

They have licenses for that, just as they have licenses for musicians who want to sell their covers of other people's songs.

You think those sites have actual licenses to do what they do? Hell to the fuck no they don't.
 

Ray Wonder

Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
So if I own an IP of any sort, someone else should be able to use it and profit from it without my permission/giving me royalties because "that's how they make money"?

If you owned the IP would you be singing the same tune? What if royalites are how you "fed your family"

Get real man.

Actually, as a matter of fact, royalties are exactly were my livelihood comes from. I've had people use my music in videos, and I've had people steal my music to try and resell it. The latter is when I took action.

I'm not understanding the snarky way you're responding to me, like you're happy that these people may go broke.
 
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/

so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.

It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.

I got ID matched for audio DICE put into Battlefield 4, it doesn't have to be the uploader adding in music
 
People no longer making gaming videos on youtube (be it a Let's Play, a review, news etc) unless they are already one of the biggest channels in a network (like Maker, machinima ect) or they only doing it part time (and thus not many videos) due to working an other job (and thus do not have to make a living off youtube).

Well, that's kind of shitty.
 

ph00p

Banned
I don't understand the complaints as the people complaining about it are clearly the ones who made mistakes when figuring out how to monetize their work.


They also made the mistake of making youtube their only source of income is seems. The internet is a living thing, it's always changing, you've got to plan to adapt, thats business.
 

MarkusRJR

Member
Yes, this is a good thing! I hope guys like PewDieShit get destroyed!
And what about the hundreds of other gaming related channels (which are good) that get destroyed in the process? Hardly a good thing, especially if you like the channels and their video content.
 

Laconic

Banned
Actually, as a matter of fact, royalties are exactly were my livelihood comes from. I've had people use my music in videos, and I've had people steal my music to try and resell it. The latter is when I took action.

I'm not understanding the snarky way you're responding to me, like you're happy that these people may go broke.

I like your stance, on people using your work. That seems quite fair and reasonable. :)
 
Is this stuff all happening to coincide with how much easier it is to record,upload and share next gen footage now? and try nip that before it gets out of control later in the gen? or do you think it's just a coincidence?
 

patapuf

Member
Is this stuff all happening to coincide with how much easier it is to record,upload and share next gen footage now? and try nip that before it gets out of control later in the gen? or do you think it's just a coincidence?

Considering neither console uploads to youtube i find that unlikely.
 
Is this stuff all happening to coincide with how much easier it is to record,upload and share next gen footage now? and try nip that before it gets out of control later in the gen? or do you think it's just a coincidence?

Nah, the writing was on the wall for this the day that you saw someone seriously say "I'll just watch this game on Youtube".
 

zakislam

Member
That's not true at all. SOME videos are being claimed by irrelevant companies. The vast bulk of what we've seen have been issue by actual game companies, hence all the complains about Nintendo

So, by coincident, every gaming channel all receive content ID claims on the exact same day?

Gaming companies all met up and thought "let's content ID match everyone and lose free promotion of our game and put off the channel from uploading future videos further showcasing our games"?

This is clearly YouTube's doing. If companies wanted to mass-claim content, they would have done it before yesterday. It doesn't sound fishy to you that all these content ID claims get implemented on the same day and just a few days after the "affiliate" news was announced?
 

wildfire

Banned
I don't understand why people think they should be allowed to make money off copyrighted content.

I made guitar covers for years on YouTube and it's been a constant battle. The song is copyrighted, even if I'm doing a cover (and I'm not trying to monetize!)
These gaming videos aren't covers or anything, they're literally the equivalent of me uploading a song and then being annoyed that one, it gets taken down, and two, that I can't make money off somebody else's song.


You really need to separate the story in a game from the actual playing the game part.

What you said is the definition of piracy. I'm sorry but I don't vicariously play the game through whatever esport player I'm watching.
 

zakislam

Member
IDOL manages some audio labels' rights
http://idol.io/

so this person must have included music on his video without authorization to monetize. However it does not block the video and does not penalize his account.

It seems the big YouTubers are now required to provide more proof of authorization to monetize, a thing they were protected from before by being part of a network.

They're still part of a network but if you're an "affiliate, looks like you're affected by all these negative changes and content ID claims.
 
It's not a coincidence. YouTube rolled out a new ContentID algorithm which is catching far more than the previous one.

Any reports of problems from people NOT monetizing their content?

I've got hundreds of video game videos and not a single extra claim arrived today with that “new system”.
 

railGUN

Banned
What a mess.

Its going to be a fuck of a job, but I think I'm going to move my entire (non-gaming) channel off YouTube soon, not because I've had any problems directly, but because they've truly lost their way.
 

Ray Wonder

Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
You really need to separate the story in a game from the actual playing the game part.

What you said is the definition of privacy. I'm sorry but I don't vicariously play the game through whatever esport player I'm watching.

I agree, that's like saying if I put a video up of me playing "Bop It", equates to me uploading a new album.

You're not playing the game. You are, however, listening to the music. You buy games to play, you buy music to listen.
 

SoyTits

Banned
Outside of video games, I was trying to listen to some old Radio Grafittis last night and there were copyright claims!

Ghost ended up winning in the end!
 
So is this some mistake where copyright claims have caught up lets plays or is it really publishers going after these channels?
 

VE3TRO

Formerly Gizmowned
Right, but this must have something to do with the "affiliate" announcement a few days ago.

Zak it's Reece here. Not seen you in ages dude. Yea all this stuff going on is regards to the affiliate stuff which happened last week.
 

wildfire

Banned
I'm amused by all of these comments that are saying 'we'll just move to Dailymotion/Vimeo/<some other site>!' All that will happen is that the copyright claims now going to Youtube will go to the new site, and that site will either cave and pull down/flag/monetize videos for the claimant, or they'll ignore the complaints, get sued, taken to court and shut down. I'm sure that YouTube would love to have as many LP videos on their site as possible (content is content, and LP viewers are seeing ads). It's the threat of litigation, not some malice on the part of Google, that's to blame here.

But there most likely is a double standard at play. DSP mentions he is not getting flagged for Injustice and Super Mario 3D World. I visited those pages and there are still ads playing right now. That means Google should still be being paid by advertisers. They simply aren't distributed DSP's cut for his content.


Publishers would rather tackle the smaller fish than Google. If I'm correct about Google still getting paid then they should be hit with a class action lawsuit.
 
Top Bottom