I rarely, and I mean RARELY wear make-up. I think I look just fine without it.
WHY ARENT YOU RUNNING AWAY
I rarely, and I mean RARELY wear make-up. I think I look just fine without it.
I don't truly believe anything on this subject because I find the nature vs nurture aspects are far beyond my understanding. It's like asking me why someone has blue as their favourite colour. Hell, I don't even know how I chose my favourite colour, let alone the next man. Was it innate? Did I see a lot of cool green things as a baby? I have no fucking idea.Their decision is altered by these factors. They're not robbed of all agency but like men their decisions are not 100% influenced by them alone. It's the same with all styles. Do you truly believe that almost all women decided on their own to wear dresses and almost all men decided against wearing dresses? We're not robbing anyone of their agency. We're saying this does exist and it's not wrong to live within it or out of it but that it exists and is something to think about.
I feel your pain re: raccoon eyes.However, I'll say this, I refuse to have my photos taken of me without make up on. I'm horribly anti-photogenic and make-up just happens to alleviate that. It doesn't help that I have hereditary raccoon eyes. :\
I think it goes/can go earlier than that. Girls usually pick up on a lot of habits from their mothers already. A few year old girl sees her mother putting on make-up and the next day they are at their mother's make-up drawer/purse/whatever plastering their face with thick layers of make-up.
He's my buddy.WHY ARENT YOU RUNNING AWAY
I love wearing makeup, because it makes me look better.
I don't truly believe anything on this subject because I find the nature vs nurture aspects are far beyond my understanding. It's like asking me why someone has blue as their favourite colour. Hell, I don't even know how I chose my favourite colour, let alone the next man. Was it innate? Did I see a lot of cool green things as a baby? I have no fucking idea.
Why do some people follow fashion trends, and others don't? Of those that follow trends, why do they follow some and not others?
Studies have shown that womens faces are more attractive to both sexes during the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle. Makeup works because it exaggerates or even completely fabricates these signs of fertility and sexual availability, thus making a woman seem more appealing.
Those ancient Egyptians were on to something with the eye makeup, for example. Women, in contrast with men, tend to be naturally darker around their eyes. Eyeliner, eye shadow and mascara all enhance this effect, thus making a face look more feminine. Studies by Richard Russell at Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania have shown that the darker the eyes are in relation to the rest of the face, the more attractive a woman appears, while the opposite is true for men.
As with eyes, Russell found that women have darker mouths than men of the same skin tone. Manipulating lips to be darker than the rest of a womans face makes it appear more feminine
Pretty much.Relevant -
Studies by Richard Russell at Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania have shown that the darker the eyes are in relation to the rest of the face, the more attractive a woman appears, while the opposite is true for men.
Please explain why you feel such.
Why?
So are clothes
Be free
Bras are a form of deception.
Somebody doesn't know a lot about bras.Yeah, if we're talking about push up bras then I'd agree.
Well the natural mode for women is to lie and deceive so from a evolutionary psychology perspective it's the opposite of deception.
Somebody doesn't know a lot about bras.
Somebody doesn't know a lot about bras.
I'm a measly 34AIndeed, a 25+(?) and/or after kid woman with perky tits is one who is wearing a bra that would be considered a push up bra. With padding. Seriously why does nearly every bra have padding? 36D and my bras have to have padding?
Most forms of makeup are designed to conceal and modify (perceived) imperfections. My point is a person who wears makeup aims to alter features on their face in order to give the appearance that things are fuller, richer in colour, longer and smoother than they actually are. Regardless of whether someone looks better or worse the end result is a false representation of what the person wearing makeup naturally looks like. This is what the cosmetics industry is all about -- hiding and modifying supposed natural imperfections to produce a misleading, flawless end result.
The concept of the 'natural (makeup) look' further highlights this, imo. Make up that is subtly applied in such a way that the wearer is often mistaken for being makeup free and naturally bears the particular features that have been enhanced.
Clothes can be deceptive, but it doesn't happen often and they rarely alter your natural features.
Yeah, if we're talking about push up bras then I'd agree.
Yeah, especially when it comes to bras. I mean, jeez.literally anything you can do to your appearance can be seen as deception then following that logic. Also when you invoke the word "deception" you're introducing morality to your the argument. In other words you're saying it's morally wrong to alter your appearance because it is deceptive. That's an asinine stance to take.
To call people deceptive for using makeup but not calling out the societal standards that makes people feel like they have to wear it to begin with and the industry that makes billions off of it and have no problem perpetuating those standards is backwards.
Lastly I never been deceived by anyone wearing blue eye shadow and blue lipstick because I know that shit straight up isn't possible.
I'm a measly 34A
Huh. There speaks a dude that never tried to chat up a dead chick.Lastly I never been deceived by anyone wearing blue eye shadow and blue lipstick because I know that shit straight up isn't possible.
I'd be happy if I was a B.I wish I was smaller, I was a 34B before my son came along. It's not all it's cracked up to be, sometimes I get them caught in things (shut up it's a thing), and lying flat on my back, they slide up and I start to slowly suffocate. They're also heavy.
Plus: You can walk around with no bra, and less men start at you for wearing a comfortable low cut shirt.
I'd be happy if I was a B.
So the first reason is interesting to me: "I'm a grown woman and I can do whatever I want." This is similar to many others: "Because I like it," for instance.
On a superficial level, this argument seems difficult to argue against, but I think a more probing analysis might say otherwise. Most importantly: well, why does that woman want to do what she wants to do? Why does the woman like it?
Do she/we think she wants to wear makeup because that's just who she is? Or do we think that her desire to wear makeup is influenced by external forces outside her control -- some of which may be insidious?
As a more extreme example to clarify the concept: imagine a 1950s housewife. A huge number of these women were perfectly happy being housewives. The question we might ask, then, is why was that the case? Did it just happen to be true that a lot more women at that time wanted to be domestic than there are presently? I think a reasonable person could argue that many of these women were influenced by society in such a way that they viewed domestic life as their "proper" place, without ever being aware that they were being influenced in this fashion. They did prefer to be domestic, but those preferences did not spring out of thin air, and were not created by their brains alone (or even created by their brains primarily).
Similarly, the notion that women just want to wear makeup because that's who they are is a suspect notion. How did they get to be "who they are?" How did they end up liking the things they like?
Of course the source of inspiration can be someone else than their mother and yeah, kids (boys & girls) often love facepaintings so they might find it fun if they can mess their faces no matter if it's facepaint or make-up. It can be an older sister, an aunt, a female friend of the family or, like possibly in your case, a game where make-up is applied.I'm the mother of a 4.5 year old daughter (and 3 year old son). My daughter really loves putting on make-up, so I've been thinking about this subject and how she became such a fan of the stuff. I personally wear no make-up at all, since I find it to be a hassle and hate the way it feels. So clearly my daughter's fondness isn't from watching me. I personally can think of two reasons why she might like it so much.
1. Like most kids, she loves drawing and painting in general. Make-up at her age is a fun excuse to paint her face with bright colors.
2. A while ago we downloaded some iPad games/apps, and one of them lets you put make-up on cartooney girls, as well as style their hair and change a few outfits. She plays with this app quite a bit.
I'll be curious to see if her enjoyment of make-up continues as she gets older, or if it's just another phase she goes through.
It doesn't help that I have hereditary raccoon eyes. :\
literally anything you can do to your appearance can be seen as deception then following that logic. Also when you invoke the word "deception" you're introducing morality to your the argument. In other words you're saying it's morally wrong to alter your appearance because it is deceptive. That's an asinine stance to take.
To call people deceptive for using makeup but not calling out the societal standards that makes people feel like they have to wear it to begin with and the industry that makes billions off of it and have no problem perpetuating those standards is backwards.
Lastly I never been deceived by anyone wearing blue eye shadow and blue lipstick because I know that shit straight up isn't possible.
Having makeup on when you don't want people to know you have makeup on.My use of the word "deception" was in relation to make up. If the use of make up isn't inherently rooted in deception then explain the natural makeup look.
Having makeup on when you don't want people to know you have makeup on.
Covering up acne scars, bruises, etc.Is that not a form of trickery tho? Why would you not want people to know you have it on?
If that's what you've gathered about feminism/feminists, you're mistaken.
The key factor in the feminist movement is to give women a CHOICE. This means giving women the freedom to make choices and not be judged for it. Whereas in the 50's every woman was expected to become a housewife and that was it, feminism is fighting so that we can pursue education or be stay at home wives if we please~ if that makes us happy.
Feminism, again, is about giving women freedom of choice. This topic here is a feminist movement. Women who chose to wear or not wear makeup are both right and happy, and that's what feminism wants. To give women a voice and opportunities.
When have feminists told other women what to do? Feminism is about given women choice. Some women like wearing make up, others do not but no one is forced to do one over the other especially when they do not wish to do so.
I'll be happy to teach you, darling <3. Makeup for Asians can be very different from popular guides given that we often have different facial structure than nonAsians.
My use of the word "deception" was in relation to makeup. If the use of makeup isn't inherently rooted in deception then explain the natural makeup look. Look at how many people have been fooled into thinking a chick has no makeup on when she's subtly covered in it. Why does this particular form of makeup application exist? Is it not designed to fool people into thinking that the wearer has naturally smooth skin, perfectly sculputed brows etc. when such features have actually been enhanced by a cosmetic product.
You complain about the industry and societal standards that reinforce perceptions about beauty and yet you seem offended by my comments on the use of makeup. I don't get that.
No one is forced to wear it and if people keep associating the use of cosmetic products with things like confidence, happiness and notions of beauty then those societal standards and the industry that makes billions will remain.
Their decision is altered by these factors. They're not robbed of all agency but like men their decisions are not 100% influenced by them alone. It's the same with all styles. Do you truly believe that almost all women decided on their own to wear dresses and almost all men decided against wearing dresses? We're not robbing anyone of their agency. We're saying this does exist and it's not wrong to live within it or out of it but that it exists and is something to think about.
I'm not sure this is a good example of limited agency. Just because things are marketed towards one gender over another, it doesn't mean that people of that gender like that thing specifically because it's been marketed towards them. (It's easier to find out what people like, then market it to them, rather than marketing something to make people like it).Well, it runs in to a different problem, particularly in the US: people like the concept of freedom, we have a strong independent streak, and we like to think of our choices as our own. Despite claims to the contrary, both sides of the political spectrum have this in common.
Suggesting that people don't make their own choices rubs a lot of people the wrong way, and is particularly sensitive in a situation like this, because women have fought so hard to be seen as independent, intelligent people who are just as capable as men (which they are). Suggesting that agency is limited is difficult to distinguish (again, in this context) from classical sexism. Just to make it clear: I think agency is limited for men and women. It isn't as if men in the US are born with a natural appreciation for NFL Football or Call of Duty.
30 Helens agree.
I'm not sure this is a good example of limited agency. Just because things are marketed towards one gender over another, it doesn't mean that people of that gender like that thing specifically because it's been marketed towards them. (It's easier to find out what people like, then market it to them, rather than marketing something to make people like it).
I mean, you're not gonna make me like football no matter how much you market it to me.
I don't know much about the research, I'm really speaking for personal experience after having lived as both male and female.It's difficult to distinguish between these two superficially. I would say that neurological evidence suggests limited agency.
I'd replace genetic with "biological." Biology has an unknown effect on who we are, yeah, and from my experience hormones trigger different interests depending on who you are and where you are. It also makes you think differently. While I do acknowledge environmental factors, I think that the reasoning, "You like X because society says so," is mostly wrong, or rather, the reasoning is incomplete. It's an easy reason that's so easy it ends up being wrong. It's a lot more complicated than that.Sure, these aren't absolutes. Everyone is a combination of genetic and environmental influences.
Well, it runs in to a different problem, particularly in the US: people like the concept of freedom, we have a strong independent streak, and we like to think of our choices as our own. Despite claims to the contrary, both sides of the political spectrum have this in common.
Suggesting that people don't make their own choices rubs a lot of people the wrong way, and is particularly sensitive in a situation like this, because women have fought so hard to be seen as independent, intelligent people who are just as capable as men (which they are). Suggesting that agency is limited is difficult to distinguish (again, in this context) from classical sexism. Just to make it clear: I think agency is limited for men and women. It isn't as if men in the US are born with a natural appreciation for NFL Football or Call of Duty.