thechristoph
Sir!
Source? Don't state things like these without convincing evidence.
Your ass better bring peer-reviewed clinical trials and medical journals to every casual conversation.
Source? Don't state things like these without convincing evidence.
This sounds to me like entrapment for child support or something. Am I being too paranoid?
Do it...but use protection.
When she says she doesn't have time to date, I'm sure what she means is: "I don't have time to date right now, so I don't have time to meet someone and have children, before it's too late." It doesn't necessarily mean she won't have time to care for a child. But as someone else said, 32 isn't all that old. She's likely got a few years left, to look for someone.
Put it in her butt instead, OP.
New thread for new victim?I have this same deal with a friend, but I told her I won't be responsable for the kid. She seems fine with that, but I wouldn't do it without some advice from my lawyer first.
If she doesn't have time to go out on dates, she sure as shit doesn't have enough time to take care of a child.
Just give her your sperm and have a no strings attached contract signed or something.
She can decide then.
No sex, no way.
Really?! If you happen to have/remember articles on this, it's super interesting. Also seems kind of messed up IMO. A situation like the OP's should be allowed for in the law.In America at least a contract like this holds no water. It's been tried and hasn't held up.
Really?! If you happen to have/remember articles on this, it's super interesting. Also seems kind of messed up IMO. A situation like the OP's should be allowed for in the law.
However, these protections are limited, as the states that have adopted the 1973 version of the UPA have generally not been willing to extend these protections to a donor when there has not been a physician involved in the insemination process. For example, if the insemination takes place at home, even without intercourse, if a physician was not involved in the process, the donor is not protected by this law.
[A few courts have found that as a policy matter, a biological father should never be able to contract out of his financial obligation to the child, as this only harms the child in the long run.
Presumably the child support issue should be fixable by getting OP's friend to sign a written agreement.
Assuming that gets squared away, I don't see anything wrong with this at all.
Edit:
Really?! If you happen to have/remember articles on this, it's super interesting. Also seems kind of messed up IMO. A situation like the OP's should be allowed for in the law.