brandonh83
Banned
ohhhhhh trust me, you will lol.
Rock. I may be the captain of the BBDF, but I like a thinking man's piece too.
ohhhhhh trust me, you will lol.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1310123
Plz use spoiler tread if you want to discuss potential spoilers
We are assuming that only Louise was the only one given the gift of circular memory... Louise was "1 of 12". Perhaps Shang was also given the gift? Perhaps the gift was given to a person at each landing site?
Oh. My. God. That was one of the most beautiful, powerful films I've ever seen. Totally exceeded my expectations (and made me tear up/cry about 6 times).
Arrival really works. Villeneuve has been a rising director that has intrigued me, but never really made a truly fantastic film until now. The twisty plot is constantly compelling, and for once, grounded in an actual emotional story. The other two films of Villeneuve I've seen are cold, methodical movies; this is a warm piece of cinema, thanks to the strongest script Villeneuve has directed yet, along with a new sense of scope for his directing style to sink into.
But enough about Villeneuve; it'd be a shame not to talk about Arrival's cast. Mainly, Amy Adams gives one of her best performances yet. She takes an impossible experience, and allows the audience to experience it alongside her with her monumental sinking into her character. It's powerful, and one of the best aspects of an already great film. Renner is a likable presence too, and the few points where he has more to work with, he delivers absolutely phenomenal acting. The film is pretty much a two person show, but that's fine, really.
Technically, the film is at the top of its game. The visual effects are very good, and Johan Johansson's score is the first time he's really impressed this reviewer. It's ethereal and haunting in an elegant manner that also has its own unique flavor. Also, one might've been worried without Roger Deakins for cinematography, but Bradford Young more than delivers a beautiful film; there are plenty of iconic shots in this to go around.
There's a lot to talk about in-depth for Arrival, but it'd be best for audiences to just go out and discover it for themselves. Arrival is one of the best science fiction films in years, with fantastic direction, a really magical script, and an incredibly strong central performance. This film must not be missed.
Did you just copy and paste a review or are you referring to yourself as "this reviewer?"
Did you just copy and paste a review or are you referring to yourself as "this reviewer?"
Didnt love this movie like most, but I will say everything about the first encounter sequence was A+. The dramatic build-up by placing us directly in Dr. Banks shoes, by having only as much information as she does, the behind the head shots with the deep focus of all the background activity, the superb physical performance of Amy Adams, Bradford Young's wonderful photography, that great alien droning sound from Johann Johannsson, the fantastic CG for the alien ship and the aliens themselves, how the quiet tension is interupted by very specific noises on the sound design(the sudden jolting grab of Weber on Banks' suit, the bird chirping). Its hard not to invoke Kubrick because of the 2001-esque black monolith, but there's an exactness in all the elements of craft to create a very specific tone or feeling Villeneuve wants the audience to experience. Just a lot of things working in unison to create a really awesome sequence. And I mean "awesome" in the original sense, that it inspires awe. I cant remember the last time an alien meeting seemed so ominous.
Man, this movie is really great! Beautiful and very moving at the end. I was goddamn choking up at the end there. Renner surprised me in this because I generally don't like him not that he was particularly great but he at least didn't take me out of it with hammy acting. From the trailers, I was a little worried about Amy Adams performance as some lines hit me a little weird but she was, of course, fantastic.
I can't wait to see what Villanueve does with Blade Runner and I need to go back and watch his stuff I haven't seen. He's two for two with me between this and Sicario. I actually have Prisoners but never got around to it so it's time!
Was this filmed in 60fps? It had a weird look to it that I associate with 60FPS like a BBC-ish ness if that makes sense? I wasn't sure if it was the filmic technique or a projection issue.
I'm confused how other people can be confused about the ending. It's not like the film was subtle in explaining what happened.
Really enjoyed it but I tilted my head at the way that Amy Adams' characterThe movie kind of sets upconvinces the Chinese General to stand downtime as being as being linear and defined. If she learned his wife's dying words in the future to cause that future isn't that paradoxical? Her memories if you can call them that are restricted to a timeline in which she gets with Renner and has a child and the child dies of a rare illness. If they had shown her seeing all kinds of stuff that'd be more in line with a multiverse theory but that's not what we have here. Also the way she finds out was weirdly on the nose, "You told me my wife's dying words","Oh yeah, here's my private number." What?
Great movie otherwise.
I feel like everyone in the showing I went to came out disappointed that there were no explosions. I'd only seen a single trailer though and part of me understands why they went in expecting something like Independence Day.I'm confused how other people can be confused about the ending. It's not like the film was subtle in explaining what happened.
What was your interpretation of the ending?
What was your interpretation of the ending?
I mean... I know some people are discussing the film on a deeper level, but that part should be obvious right?Learning the language allowed Amy Adams to perceive time in a non linear way. The scenes with her daughter were in the future
I wasn't aware there was even room for multiple interpretations
I mean... I know some people are discussing the film on a deeper level, but that part should be obvious right?Learning the language allowed Amy Adams to perceive time in a non linear way. The scenes with her daughter were in the future
I mean... I know some people are discussing the film on a deeper level, but that part should be obvious right?Learning the language allowed Amy Adams to perceive time in a non linear way. The scenes with her daughter were in the future
I feel the same way. Honestly I thought a lot of the plot points were pretty dumb. Like if you think about some of the stuff that went on in this movie it's laughable. When the title came up on the screen at the end I couldn't help but think, 'that's it?'.I got to say I was intrigued by the film's premise and the GAF hype, and I was frankly disappointed and bored with it. I felt that it had similar themes with Interstellar, and that movie was far better in conveying its messages.
You might want to check out the spoiler thread. There's noThis just came out in Sweden, so I had to watch it immediately due to my Denis Villeneuve fandom. I really enjoyed the movie, and Amy Adams was spectacular in it, but the linguistics aspect seems incredibly oversold in the pre-release information and the reviews. I was fully expecting the protagonist to come up with clever interpretations of an unknown language based on logic to show her competence, but we got very little of that in the first 90 minutes, followed by the movie abandoning linguistics entirely in favor offor its resolution. A bit disappointing.time travel mechanics
You might want to check out the spoiler thread. There's noin this film.time travel
Suggesting that it's a lazy way out, like it wasn't an integral part of many scenes in the film from the very beginning.I don't want to sound condescending, but what is your point? The distinction that you want to make seems like splitting hairs and has no bearing on the point I was trying to make.
I had a major death anxiety attack after the movie :-(
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Arrival-Blu-ray/164834/When is the blu ray out?
You might want to check out the spoiler thread. There's noin this film.time travel
But the issue he took isn't with anyNah he's right.Whether there's physical transportation or merely information passing back and forth, the same paradoxes and logic issues apply. For example, if you physically go back in time and kill yourself, preventing your future travel, that's a paradox. If you passed a message along to someone else in the past through a text message and convinced them to kill you, preventing you from sending the future message, the same paradox applies. It's six of one, half a dozen of the other.
But the issue he took isn't with any.paradoxes. It's that time travel was a lazy way out, as if it was just a neat convenient way to close out the story that was otherwise nothing to do with being able to "be" in multiple moments non-sequentially