At the very least they need to include Rush in the sound track. Preferably Anthem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VcswhBy9tk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VcswhBy9tk
matt stone and trey parker are libertarians, so this will never ever happen!Guy LeDouche said:lol, this needs to be adapted by the South Park guys with a "THIS IS WHAT THEY REALLY BELIEVE" lower third.
EmCeeGramr said:the smartest and best looking man in the world builds the best company ever all by himself and invents every single product they put out all by himself (including super metal, the best metal ever)
the evil government tries to steal it from him and he and his rich super genius friends go live in a secret super best town where nobody has to share with anyone ever and they watch as all the fat dumb poor people cry and society collapses without their amazing talents
EmCeeGramr said:matt stone and trey parker are libertarians, so this will never ever happen!
minus_273 said:you dont know what residual owners are do you? you might want to look it up. the people who got the big money were the bondholders the owners were screwed.
I'm fairly certain he's busy making a movie based on the excellent Louis Couperus novel 'De Stille Kracht' (The Silent Force)Chichikov said:I was just thinking, you know what Atlas Shrugged needs?
The Starship Troopers cinematic treatment.
Is Paul Verhoeven free?
You have the power to bring it back.EviLore said:Why did I remove the :lol emoticon?!?!?!?!
Don't get off track about telling us how the GM bailout was a "seizure"minus_273 said:HAHAHA someone who loves south park didnt realize its one of the most right leaning shows on tv!
emmmGuy LeDouche said:lol, this needs to be adapted by the South Park guys with a "THIS IS WHAT THEY REALLY BELIEVE" lower third.
BigNastyCurve said:I love the presumptuousness inherent in labeling it "part 1".
I think both parts were filmed simultaneously.BigNastyCurve said:I love the presumptuousness inherent in labeling it "part 1".
FoneBone said:I think both parts were filmed simultaneously.
Read aloud it's 3 hours long :lolConfusingJazz said:Is part 2 only the John Galt speech?
sn00zer said:Well I actually like Atlas Shrugged (boo! hiss!) but wtf.....story doesnt apply to modern setting at all...
Why indeed... does this mean you're bringing it back now?EviLore said:Why did I remove the :lol emoticon?!?!?!?!
minus_273 said:its a privately funded movie made on a $20-25 million budget and will likely make much more than that given the popularity of the books for the past half century or so. the book can be neatly broken into three parts and the other 2 parts are likely already being made.
Gaborn said:
They already made to great movies based on Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged." They were called "Iron Man" and "Iron Man 2."
Rand didn't like Shakespeare because in his works man was not in control of HIS OWN DESTINY. She was as boneheadedly, obstinately dogmatic in matters of art as she was in everything else. If a writer did not portray man as a radiant mass of muscular, steel-jawed, HUGE-COCKED perfection then this writer was worthless to her. She had delusional ideas of mankind and of art, and added nothing of any value to either.FiRez said:The Romantic Manifesto is a very nice and intelligent essay it also has some very good tips about writing.
Christ that's long.mamacint said:Read aloud it's 3 hours long :lol
Can't wait!
minus_273 said:its funny how afraid GAF is of this movie. The government seizing GM wasn't popular and i suspect something like this movie would resonate in some way with at least 50% of the voting public.
I hear behind me the approaching sound of this being quoted and loled at many times over.Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
Pretty much, it's OK to stand up for your rights unless it's for economic reasons. Economic reasons make you greedy. -_-
Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
Pretty much, it's OK to stand up for your rights unless it's for economic reasons. Economic reasons make you greedy. -_-
What rights are the Tea Party standing up for, again?Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
Pretty much, it's OK to stand up for your rights unless it's for economic reasons. Economic reasons make you greedy. -_-
Man, "lol" just doesn't convey the same meaning it used to.Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
Pretty much, it's OK to stand up for your rights unless it's for economic reasons. Economic reasons make you greedy. -_-
Dude what?Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
You motherfucker. Gave me hope for one glorious moment.Jinfash said:
Edit: Gasp, it's a miracle.
Chichikov said:Dude what?
I mean, it's fine to disagree with "liberal-gaf", but is it not expected that people that hate the Tea Party will also hate Ayn Rand?
This is like saying "it's funny that the people who make fun of Chomsky are the same people who make fun of the huffington post".
See we make fun of you guys because you actually think the Tea Party is on equal footing with those groups.Slevin140 said:Liberal-GAF is funny. The same people that make fun of Ayn Rand are the ones that make fun of the Tea Party. The same people that make fun of the Tea Party are the most ardent supporters of Gay Pride marches and the original Civil Rights movement.
Pretty much, it's OK to stand up for your rights unless it's for economic reasons. Economic reasons make you greedy. -_-
Chichikov said:Dude what?
I mean, it's fine to disagree with "liberal-gaf", but is it not expected that people that hate the Tea Party will also hate Ayn Rand?
This is like saying "it's funny that the people who make fun of Chomsky are the same people who make fun of the huffington post".
Answer my question.Slevin140 said:It's OK guys, Bill Maher is on in a hour or so
EmCeeGramr said:What rights are the Tea Party standing up for, again?
EmCeeGramr said:Answer my question.
The shareholders of GM were robbed by myopic management that was willing to cut corners and ask a newly minted President Ronald Reagan to force a production limit on Japanese manufacturers back in the winter of '81.minus_273 said:GM was not a loan it was seized from its owners and given to someone else. The shareholders of GM were robbed