They're actually gonna call it Battlefield 1? :/ I mean, I guess they haven't filled that slot in the "main series" outside of 1942 being the actual first for the series. But... :/
Cross-post from old thread
WWI with dinosaurs. Why the fuck not?
WWI with dinosaurs. Why the fuck not?
Come on WWI or WWII. Pretty please.
Not sure how it could be set in 1920 when there was no major war in that year.
Maybe they're playing with alternative history outcomes (not time-travel).Not sure how it could be set in 1920 when there was no major war in that year.
Not sure how it could be set in 1920 when there was no major war in that year.
I'm instantly in for this if it's WW1/2.
Instantly out if it's modern crap.
Why are 1920 and dinosaurs being mentioned?
Cross-post from old thread
Maybe they're playing with alternative history outcomes (not time-travel).
Why are 1920 and dinosaurs being mentioned?
I wonder why they chose that name tho.
It would take amazing balls to name your next battlefield game "Battlefield 1" since you know we have BF4, personally i'm pretty excited that DICE is gonna perhaps try something very different this time around.
because of this post
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=202542429&postcount=758
no idea about the dinosaurs thing
A junior said he was told by a source that it was called Battlefield 1 and set in 1920. And he wasn't banned and Nirolak quoted him when the last thread was closed. I can't pull it over because I'm on mobile.Why are 1920 and dinosaurs being mentioned?
Wow. That at 60fps?! Hoooolllllyyyy..
As in: Realistic alternative outcomes.If it's truly alternate history then I want crazy weapons ala The Order: 1886.
DerZuhälter;202730491 said:World War 1 would be horrible and an instant turn off for me.
WWII Confirmed
DerZuhälter;202730491 said:World War 1 would be horrible and an instant turn off for me.