OfTheOverflow
Member
This is going to be a fun thread.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Battlefield 1 PC Performance Thread
- Thread starter iRAWRasaurus
- Start date
dr_rus
Member
It didn't in the beta but they might've improved it for release.
The beta ran at max settings, 1080p and 60FPS almost all the time on my i5 6500/GTX 1060 combo. Hopefully, CPU utilization was further optimized for the final release.
Wonderful! This is exactly how it should run on my rig.
Jeff Stephen
Member
What's the command to list the internal renderer?
paperspace
Member
render.drawscreeninfo 1
Jeff Stephen
Member
Much appreciated.
FairXchange
Member
Looking good for my i7 4790k and R9 390.
Rushersauce
Banned
HIGH FIVE! (My processor is a non k variant, though)
RadioactiveLobster
Member
Is SLI still broken in DX 11?
Is there any Multi GPU tech for DX12?
Is there any Multi GPU tech for DX12?
MrOogieBoogie
BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
Got you covered, baby.
It's going to be a short thread. This game runs amazing out of the box.
NJDEN
Member
i5 4690k
GTX 1080
16GB RAM
SSD
1080p 144hz monitor
Running DX11
I'm getting kind of mixed results. I've had it at capped out 144 frames for close up areas, but typically average around 90-100 frames. I've had dips down into the 30's when overlooking the battlefield. I kind of feel like a GTX 1080 @ 1080p should be giving me 100 fps or higher at pretty much all times. I am running on Ultra settings, but I would expect the gpu could handle it. I'm also hoping that the optimized drivers will give it a boost. I feel like I had more consistent framerate on my 970 during the beta's desert map.
GTX 1080
16GB RAM
SSD
1080p 144hz monitor
Running DX11
I'm getting kind of mixed results. I've had it at capped out 144 frames for close up areas, but typically average around 90-100 frames. I've had dips down into the 30's when overlooking the battlefield. I kind of feel like a GTX 1080 @ 1080p should be giving me 100 fps or higher at pretty much all times. I am running on Ultra settings, but I would expect the gpu could handle it. I'm also hoping that the optimized drivers will give it a boost. I feel like I had more consistent framerate on my 970 during the beta's desert map.
Quixz
Member
Is the CPU overclocked at all? You might be running into a bottle neck.
Nvidia's visual indicator shows SLI working in DX 11, but it doesn't seem to perform any better than a single card. It is not working in DX 12. My specs:
6700k @4.5
Dual 980 TIs
32g RAM
Average frames, 1440p, Ultra, 64p Conquest (eyeballing, not a benchmark):
DX 11, SLI: 90-100
DX12, non-SLI: 80-90
Isn't the fact that you thought Ultra was medium a sign that it's not demanding because it's not very impressive?
NJDEN
Member
Yeah, I'm running stock. I've always been so used to the GPU being the bottleneck I hadn't really considered the CPU. I'll bump it up tomorrow and see if it runs better.
This game destroys my cpu
i5 4670K @4.2
All cores get maxed in MP and cause lots of frame drops constantly.
Even when putting settings on low and running in a tiny window I couldn't get locked 60 fps.
Sucks because I can't really afford to get a cpu better than this one at the moment, was planning to do that next year. Maybe I'll try getting faster RAM instead. But it's probably mostly a cpu issue.
The single-player runs perfect locked 60 fps.
i5 4670K @4.2
All cores get maxed in MP and cause lots of frame drops constantly.
Even when putting settings on low and running in a tiny window I couldn't get locked 60 fps.
Sucks because I can't really afford to get a cpu better than this one at the moment, was planning to do that next year. Maybe I'll try getting faster RAM instead. But it's probably mostly a cpu issue.
The single-player runs perfect locked 60 fps.
Thrillhouse
Member
Aren't those minimum cpu specs ridiculous? I mean a 6600k paired with a gtx 660? Come on.
| Praxis |
Banned
Looks like better performance than the beta for you. I'm hoping my 6600K isn't a bottleneck for my Titan.
lordfuzzybutt
Member
What RAM speed you have? DICE's Frostbyte engine benefits greatly with faster RAM.
flipswitch
Member
Did you play the beta?
Speaking of beta, if you ran that fine should I have any issues with the full game?
Well, the resolutuion scaling is working correctly unlike the beta.
And I'll have to play some multiplayer before I can make a conclusive statement.
PerezDeCorcho
Member
(Ultra Settings)
GTX 970 SLI
i7 3770K
16GB RAM
Win10
75-110 frames in multiplayer
Campaign goes anywhere between 80 to 120
GTX 970 SLI
i7 3770K
16GB RAM
Win10
75-110 frames in multiplayer
Campaign goes anywhere between 80 to 120
SilentRage47
Member
At the current state of the game my 6600k @ 4.6ghz bottleneck my gtx 1080. I use G-Sync so that's not really a big problem, but this games is really cpu hungry.
Sevenfold
Member
Surely that's a pretty common occurrence with that combo?
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
This doesnt bode well for my 2500K.
Been holding off the upgrade cuz nothing has come along that really impressed me like the 2500K did.
But maybe next year the 7000K series will have to go into my PC.
Damn i really dont want to have to build another PC.
flipswitch
Member
Setting the resolution scaling to 100% is native resolution?
SilentRage47
Member
Well, I've never experienced CPU bottleneck with any game before. Actually, the beta was fine.
I just played a solid session of multiplayer and it was performing much better, it might've been DX12 tbh. Fuck it's pretty and god damn fun. I got 2000 points in one click with the dreadnought lol.
Correct! It is just like BF4 now, not like the beta!
Sevenfold
Member
Impressed. Frostbite looks amazing too.
Yo - we have the exact same system. What resources are you using to OC your CPU? I've OC'd GPUs before but all of the guides I saw for CPU stuff seem way more intimidating. Still running at stock as a result.
I captured the first ten minutes in 4K 60fps with everything set to Ultra.
https://youtu.be/IoBf4zTk3lo
Core i7 4790k @ 4.4ghz
Nvidia Titan X Pascal
Samsung 850 EVO
16gb DDR 3
https://youtu.be/IoBf4zTk3lo
Core i7 4790k @ 4.4ghz
Nvidia Titan X Pascal
Samsung 850 EVO
16gb DDR 3
lordfuzzybutt
Member
ISee
Member
Started late 2015.
But I agree an i5 6600 minimum is a bit surprising. Must be some magic cpu optimisation on ps4.
Same dude. I'm too scared to do it!