Sorry, there's no context where claiming your game is more adult than the competition's because it's less colorful, or walking to a publisher and plainly stating you want to make a billion dollar franchise, or using the age-old "overwatch is anime" diss DOESN'T make you look like a tool.
I feel like you totally missed my point.
Does cherry picking examples of him saying things that make him look like a tool and essentially putting them into a compilation video mean that he's like that all the time? Or does it mean that in this video he's being represented as saying a fraction of toolish things over the course of what, two years?
I just think it's ridiculous to actually think he always says things that make him sound like a tool based on this video. Like, yeah, he does say things that make him sound like a tool, but it's definitely not all the time. Some of the stuff he has talked about during the development of Lawbreakers (talking about character movespeed, not wanting crossplay, why they don't have any stuns or hard CC) is pretty interesting and not inflammatory at all. Do you know why those aren't included? It's because they don't fit the narrative of the video. It's fine to not include them, but it's also kind of weak to draw any conclusions about somebody as a whole based on a specific narrative that the video editor is choosing to go for and purposely including only clips that adhere to that narrative.
Also, I'm not sure why somebody saying OW is "skewed toward an anime-fan type vibe" is offensive or even dickish. It's not a sentiment that I agree with, but even when he says something like that, it's not inherently a bad thing to skew towards. Even in the clip that the video editor used, he doesn't sound like he's putting Overwatch down at all.
