You mean to say that Epic Mickey 2 Wii is a better product than Epic Mickey 2 WiiU?
The WiiU version has an awful framerate.
You mean to say that Epic Mickey 2 Wii is a better product than Epic Mickey 2 WiiU?
Well I don't know I mean it's not coming to a platform that is starved of games either...
I mean it's not coming for WiiU, is it?
From Disney? NopeSo....Vita definitive version?
This is going to be Ninja Gaiden 3 all over again, isn't it?
Yeah, Disney Infinity coming to Vita would have made a lot more sense than a late port of Epic Mickey 2.
The only sane explanation would be if porting Epic bomba 2 is part of deal for getting infinity.
I think this takes the title of "Most Pointless Port" from Deus Ex: HR for Wii U.
Clever
...Now you've got my hopes up that they introduce a bundle with some actual color in some sort of "kid-friendly" push so I don't get stuck with a monochromatic console (or paying out the ear to import again). I want Tearaway and would probably give this a punt for the bargain bin price it'll inevitably hit, so that would be really convenient!Well, I guess if Sony is doing a price cut this Fall with a Tearaway bundle, that might pick up some of the kids market that can't afford the new boxes and has a 3DS already.
It seems to me that this is Sony's way of getting another game on the Vita without devoting significant resources to developing one from scratch.
If Sony can port third party games to Vita, why don't they port good ones?
Sony logo in the box is because Disney games in Europe are published by Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. At least in Spain.
Blog post is by an SCEE employee and describes the addition of Vita-specific features in the first person. It's their baby.
Does the Vita have a notable kids audience?
I mean I totally get the niche Japanese games or the teenager games, since those fit the PSP's profile well (and thus would be likely Vita candidates), but I'm not really following the logic for this one.
GAF complains about a lack of games for Vita.
GAF complains when games get ported to Vita.
GAF just complains.
ThisIsNeogaf.gif
Epic Random
Sony continues to support irrelevant Vita games nobody asked for.
You'll have to excuse people for not being excited to get a months old port of a garbage game.
Er, nope.
Blog post is by an SCEE employee and describes the addition of Vita-specific features in the first person. It's their baby.
Now the question is are Vita fans SO game starved that they'll play even this?
I'll gladly starve in this case THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
On the back
Ok, i see, thanks. Isnt the novelty the painting and paint remover, and isnt this present in both games? And arent there any new features to this? But it is positive that most of the things sounds subjective at least, i guess that someone will enjoy itBoring story, the AI co-op mode is broken, level design is not inspired at all, it lacks the novelty the first game had.
This sounds to me like you mean that Sony usually port the games on Vita themself. Can you mention some other confirmed examples it that is what you mean? Or how do you mean?Yep, that sounds like Sony.
Ok, i see, thanks. Isnt the novelty the painting and paint remover, and isnt this present in both games? And arent there any new features to this? But it is positive that most of the things sounds subjective at least, i guess that someone will enjoy it
Yep, always good to hear people enjoy gaming in my opinion Dont you agree? Not sure why they chose to port this particular game, but if someone will enjoy it, at least that is something positiveI mean, I read about people enjoying CoD: Declassified, so why not EM2?
Wouldn't that effect the age rating though?They should bundle it with a download code for God of War: Ghost of Sparta/Chains of Olympus as a pre order bonus.