Teknoman said:Gonna give this a shot, just to see if theres any difference.
Doesn't alt-tab intentionally quit the game? Same as in FFXI, at least when I played it.
kpop100 said:Doesn't alt-tab intentionally quit the game? Same as in FFXI, at least when I played it.
No it doesn't, its a bug.kpop100 said:Doesn't alt-tab intentionally quit the game? Same as in FFXI, at least when I played it.
kpop100 said:Doesn't alt-tab intentionally quit the game? Same as in FFXI, at least when I played it.
Broadbandito said:i dont know why i cant benchmark my pc. is it because i have an ati card?
Broadbandito said:http://i29.tinypic.com/33eh0qw.jpg
is this good? lol[/QUOTE]
ya. I got like 2500 and run the game at constant 30 fps with some dips in 720p.
Broadbandito said:http://i29.tinypic.com/33eh0qw.jpg[IMG]
is this good? lol[/QUOTE]
[B][3000-4499] Fairly High Performance[/B]
Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.
May I ask what graphics card you're running?
MCX said:[3000-4499] Fairly High Performance
Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.
May I ask what graphics card you're running?
Broadbandito said:[IM]http://i29.tinypic.com/33eh0qw.jp[/IMG]
is this good? lol
Broadbandito said:4870 1gb
also benchmark score for high res with full screen file in place was 2253 with 17635 for loading.
Teknoman said:Thats strange, mine actually lists the 4870 after having run the benchmark.
EDIT: The game actually seems to look better with both ambient occlusion and depth of field turned off (especially since they auto turn it on in cutscenes).
Jinko said:Thats about the same score I'm getting with my 4870, I think once they sort the ATI bug in the beta it will run very smoothly.
When im not having slow down issues (due to the bug) im easily hitting the 30 fps cap.
I still might get a 5870 just so I can run the game with full settings.
Teknoman said:Thats strange, mine actually lists the 4870 after having run the benchmark.
EDIT: The game actually seems to look better with both ambient occlusion and depth of field turned off (especially since they auto turn it on in cutscenes).
Unknown Soldier said:I thought Ambient Occlusion was an Nvidia-only feature?
Unknown Soldier said:Nvidia should be ashamed of the TWIMBTP logo on this benchmark. Their hosting the benchmark on their own servers is a waste of their bandwidth too, if anything the company hosting this benchmark should be ATI because of how much higher ATI cards score than Nvidia cards.
Broadbandito said:you got that score on 1080p? thats really good dude
Unknown Soldier said:Um, no. People with 5850s score around 4200-4300 at stock clocks and 4500+ when OCed. People with 5870s are breaking 5000+.
Unknown Soldier said:Um, no. People with 5850s score around 4200-4300 at stock clocks and 4500+ when OCed. People with 5870s are breaking 5000+.
Unknown Soldier said:Um, no. People with 5850s score around 4200-4300 at stock clocks and 4500+ when OCed. People with 5870s are breaking 5000+.
Man said:Is FF14 in the upper echelon when it comes to multi-core coding on PC? I've just been skimming and it seems like the game heavily uses all available cores.
Not really. It's actually surprisingly random. The less cores you have the less it works!Man said:Is FF14 in the upper echelon when it comes to multi-core coding on PC? I've just been skimming and it seems like the game heavily uses all available cores.
Well SC II runs about 16x better on my 3.8Ghz Dual core + GTX260 so I am biased.Man said:Do we know the core-cap? Four? Eight?
I'm just kinda surprised seeing Blizzard only supporting 2 cores max when FF14 is taking use of a higher number.
As you said, more cores != better coding efficiency but I wonder if this is a bi-effect of having to work on the Cell/PS3.
On the PS3 there's heaps of games (especially 1st party) that slay FF13 in the performance department so SE might not be reference material on any platform right now.
Hazaro said:Well SC II runs about 16x better on my 3.8Ghz Dual core + GTX260 so I am biased.
RTS games can be just as challenging on the CPU as any other game, StarCraft 2 is just not one of them. It designed like every other Blizzard game to work on anything reasonable.Jinko said:LOL, come on you didn't just compare an RTS to an MMO.. :|
Weird. But that's kind of disappointing to me, the quests that were not repeatable in FFXI were really my favorite part of the whole game -- the ones with a lot of story that you wouldn't really want to repeat a bunch of times, but were fun the one time you did them. All the repeatable ones were pretty much "bring me 10 of this item." I hope they've got a decent balance at least, maybe I'm just reading it wrong.Teknoman said:We really wanted to make quests less repetitive as possible for players. In Final Fantasy XI, when you were done with a quest, it was not meant to be repeated. Instead in Final Fantasy XIV we really want the players to repeat them as many times as they want. Attempts are being made to make these quests as pleasant as possible so that players do not feel bored
Estival said:Weird. But that's kind of disappointing to me, the quests that were not repeatable in FFXI were really my favorite part of the whole game -- the ones with a lot of story that you wouldn't really want to repeat a bunch of times, but were fun the one time you did them. All the repeatable ones were pretty much "bring me 10 of this item." I hope they've got a decent balance at least, maybe I'm just reading it wrong.
Estival said:Weird. But that's kind of disappointing to me, the quests that were not repeatable in FFXI were really my favorite part of the whole game -- the ones with a lot of story that you wouldn't really want to repeat a bunch of times, but were fun the one time you did them. All the repeatable ones were pretty much "bring me 10 of this item." I hope they've got a decent balance at least, maybe I'm just reading it wrong.
Classic_Gs said:Any suggestions to get the benchmark to run on Windows 7 64 bit? It crashes on me everytime :/
Yep, forgot drivers. Working now. Thx.Unknown Soldier said:The usual update drivers and Directx etc.
NfoRcEr said: