He's not equating anything, and he's not criticizing legitimate critiques of sexism.
He's just saying that the use of those kind of phrases to dismiss something is not good.
We didn't like it when the press used those "guns in games = real shootings" generalizations, but now you see tons of people dismissing people who likes feature like this one with phrases like "ewww it's creepy".
That's how it's read. He says that people who say something is sexist are arguing very closely to how those who were against violence in gaming behaved. Those are his words.
I can understand the other parts. What did not sit well with me is how he lumped in arguments of something being sexist in there.
.......
I am not equating the two things. I don't even see the crusade against violence as a bad thing (in retrospec mainly). I don't think the crusade against sexism is bad (how the fuck could I?) I think people target the wrong thing IMO but I'm not the police of that so fuck me right. But thats not an insult.
I cannot fathom how one could even reach that conclusion. I thought it pretty obvious.
and going again it had nothing to do with my point anyway. People seem to love to pinpoint some random thing to pick on (strawmans doe) instead of the main point.
I'm tired.
I literally already addressed how I agree with your point....numerous times now no less. I have even stated numerous times now that what I am not at all comfortable with is your attack on people while arguing that people shouldn't attack each other. Do you see how that would be something someone would not be comfortable with? It's not a strawman, it's addressing a point of yours in your very post. And if you don't mean it the way it's read, then a clarification would be appreciated.
Now that you have clarified your statement in this specific post, I can see where you are coming from more. I disagree on people targetting the wrong thing, I feel the right aspects are often addressed in feministi critique. I am not saying this one here is in particular fully in the right place but I can see where you are coming from now at the very least. And I thank you for that.
Good job for trying to engage Ekai and also for expressing sentiment of the whole nerd on nerd hate within gaming. But the reality is, she will take offense to literally anything and twist the arguments to seem as if she's the victim. I've seen this time and time again with other folks that try to engage her. Which is funny, because she goes to the lengths of looking through people's posts to render arguments that are besides the point.
Oh please, you literally do everything you accuse me of while also being a serial liar. You accused me (and numerous others) of having an agenda all because I dared to express my view on a sexist video game of all things. That's the fullest of extreme. Of course if I point out how you're an active abuser who loves to victimize themselves then you would just feel vindicated in your statements.
I'm having déjà vu here, lol.
Oh, and the other one who insults people for criticizing sexist content in games here. Great.