Wildstar75
Member
lol at 2018. Also I dont agree with Iwata, that consoles are a nuisance gamers put up with and pay for so they can play their games. I get excited about new consoles because games can have new features or capabilities.
"We are always preparing for the next hardware," Iwata says. "We are under development. … But the hardware is a kind of box that consumers reluctantly buy in order to play our games."
camineet said:Konix, Namco and Taito were almost newcomers to the console wars too, but their 16-bit systems were all canceled.
You may be right, but it's a perfect name for the demographic the original Xbox was aiming for: PC gamers and power-motivated console gamers in the 14 - 35 age bracket. Think about it: the name Xbox has a ring to it that makes you think "futuristic", "cutting edge" and "untapped power under the hood".legend166 said:If Microsoft were smart, they would drop the entire 'Xbox' name.
It's got a bad rep in Japan, holds absolutely no pull in Europe, and is too highly associated with one group in the US.
Plus, it's just a horrible name.
legend166 said:If Microsoft were smart, they would drop the entire 'Xbox' name.
It's got a bad rep in Japan, holds absolutely no pull in Europe, and is too highly associated with one group in the US.
Plus, it's just a horrible name.
SSM25 said:MS and Sony should release their next-gen machines next year, This generation sucks!!
kiUNiT said:It really does, I mean a $500.00 computer already kicks the fuck out of them. Last gen it took more than a couple of years and a couple of grand to show any difference.
Oh well I think MS will have something out by 2012 and Sony will be forced soon after with 4096p TVs around the corner and Nintendo will be on WiiThree with mind control by then.:lol
disappeared said:microsoft will let just about any movie or tv show these days feature the old Xbox or new one and the name is all over. axing the brand name now would be a huge fuck-up on MS;s part,
KillJade said:Double negatives suck.
Olaeh said:I've seen the 360 in the background on a commercial or two but I don't remember seeing it in many movies. I do remember Tony Stark had a Wii in IronMan though.
disappeared said:dude, "Xbox" is probably one of the most commonly associated names when someone in the mainstream audience thinks of video games, and is surely the new "Nintendo" when it comes to generalizing all games under one name. microsoft will let just about any movie or tv show these days feature the old Xbox or new one and the name is all over. axing the brand name now would be a huge fuck-up on MS;s part,
I've never known someone to reject the truth like that.mckmas8808 said:Oh really?! I don't believe.
Nintendo, as you might expect, is approaching things a bit differently. President Satoru Iwata freely admits the company is already working on the Wii's successor (something Microsoft's Shane Kim refuses to concede). However, he adds that he doesn't view the hardware as particularly interesting.
"We are always preparing for the next hardware," Iwata says. "We are under development. But the hardware is a kind of box that consumers reluctantly buy in order to play our games."
disappeared said:dude, "Xbox" is probably one of the most commonly associated names when someone in the mainstream audience thinks of video games, and is surely the new "Nintendo" when it comes to generalizing all games under one name. microsoft will let just about any movie or tv show these days feature the old Xbox or new one and the name is all over. axing the brand name now would be a huge fuck-up on MS;s part,
GaryD said:Xbox 1080 for Xmas 2010
This to (longer development cycles) is another reason I believe these are going to be 6+ year console cycleszoku88 said:I hope we don't see next-gen systems for a long time. This gen started SOOO slowly.
True, except that Nintendo didn't just kill off the Gameboy brand one day and introduced the DS. The Gameboy had gone through several iterations, and was a household name for more than a decade before the DS arrived. Plus, the DS brand was originally supposed to stand separately from the GB brand, back when Nintendo touted it's "Three Pillars" support. DS's immense popularity with it's Touch Generations software, as well as a slew of good core titles is what eventually pushed the GBA out.GamerGeorge said:Nintendo has had no problem basically killing off the Game Boy brand, which is the most successful name in the history of video game platforms, and replacing it with the Nintendo DS.
While every developer has its preferences, they ultimately tend to be hardware agnostic--and will support whoever wins out. The general hope, though, is that the consoles end up using a shared architecture.
"The worst case is, Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo all pick a different interface," says id Software's John Carmack. "That's because you have to program so differently for [the different architectures]. If we end up with a diverse set of GPUs [graphics processing units], it would make life difficult."
This. Although I guess that next gen in 2018 could contribute somehow toward revitalizing the PC segment.Deku said:I just want to watch things burn. next console in 2010 or bust.
The kind of success Nintendo is enjoying is so not depending solely on waggle.Nuclear Muffin said:Those are my predictions anyway, MS said they wanted to be first out of the gate next gen and if the Motion + really was announced as a counter measure move against a possible 360/PS3 Waggle controller, then Nintendo might want to get their next console out early in order to avoid a possible situation where MS's next machine would copy the Wii in every way and improve on it.
Well, a $500 PC this Xmas was able to kick consoles butts on CoD4, as an example.mckmas8808 said:Oh really?! I don't believe.
Do you expect Sony to drop PS3 support as soon as they wheel out PS4? If not, it'll be 2012–14. Case in point: PS2.Seiken said:PS4 - 2016.
Call Of Duty 4, Bioshock, and Oblivion are the only three titles I own that are also available on the 360 - don't get me wrong, the 360 is an awesome machine, but there's just no way you that the 360 can compete with the clarity afforded by the pc.cedric69 said:The kind of success Nintendo is enjoying is so not depending solely on waggle.Well, a $500 PC this Xmas was able to kick consoles butts on CoD4, as an example.
Since that is true, I would say that, given quality development, yes: a $500 PC is now readily able to kick consoles asses.
And I agree that the feeling is that this happened faster than in previous gens.
Keru_Shiri said:As for MS, I wouldn't expect to see them abandoning the Xbox brand unless they try and follow Nintendo's lead, and venture into blue ocean territory, but all of that is going to depend on how profitable a venture the 360 is this generation.
camineet said:Oh shit. Wii 2 = Three Wii ducktaped together, confirmed :lol :lol :lol
The 360 is already three years old waiting five more years is crazy. That's eight years!Dirtbag 504 said:You are crazy if you think they are releasing a new console in 2 years and a few months from now.
If I had to place bets it will be in 2011 / 12.
With 2011, MS will still probably beat ps4 to market by a year or 2, shit maybe even 3.
The next system I think we are going to hear about is DS2. And I'd guess we'd hear something about it by next e3.
This to (longer development cycles) is another reason I believe these are going to be 6+ year console cycles
I can't wait to watch 480i content on 2160p TVs.Eccocid said:HD brodacast and tvs are very progressive. Releasing a console with narrow HD resolutions is a mistake. Who knows when will they start to sell 2160p TVs..
Eccocid said:MEh...by the time it is 2010-2015 i bet new HD resolutions will pop up (they are testing ultra HD in japan). And consoles will lag behind it again just like this generation.
HD brodacast and tvs are very progressive. Releasing a console with narrow HD resolutions is a mistake. Who knows when will they start to sell 2160p TVs..
avaya said:There isn't enough multiplexer space to do 1080p for HD broadcast. The highest quality HD broadcasting in the world is from the BBC and that is ~20-25Mbps MPEG-4 @ 1080i.
You also will not be able to see the difference between 1080p and 2160p on TV sizes below 60".
2160p is pointless. It may happen sooner or later but not for another 10yrs.
Next move is colour based, not resolution.