It's not exactly fair to rank systems by how they aged, you should really be ranking them by how they were during their respective time periods. Ranking when considering how a console has aged would automatically remove certain systems from any discussion, and it is not exactly the system's fault. N64 was the pioneer of 3D gaming, so of course it has aged horribly. However at the time it was like nothing else.
If I were to move the list around a little, I'd say the GC should be pretty low/last. It's impact was negligible on the industry and was a complete failure in terms of 1st party support. It had some good 3rd party games, but I still believe its lineup is terrible. I could make the same argument for WiiU, but at least Nintendo is giving the console some amazing software, though this time the 3rd party software is completely absent.
To those complaining about the N64, it deserves to be highly ranked. Nintendo's first party was amazing, plus you had Rare and some good 3rd party games scattered about. The system was completely revolutionary for the time with 3D graphics and the local multiplayer experience is the best of any console to this day. Can't exactly say there is anything the GC or WiiU has done that is revolutionary or had such an impact on the industry at their respective times. I love those systems, but overall they really can;t compare to the other's achievements.