Are you saying it starts working if you kill Precision X?
I got rid of it because it was messing around with my downsampling technique. Also decided to just run everything on stock, since it ploughed through most games without breaking a sweat.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GTA V PC Performance Thread
- Thread starter noomi
- Start date
Are you saying it starts working if you kill Precision X?
I got rid of it because it was messing around with my downsampling technique. Also decided to just run everything on stock, since it ploughed through most games without breaking a sweat.
Vlaphor
Member
I have pretty much the same computer and I've been running it at 1080p with most everything maxed (though one thing was greyed out) and I've been getting pretty much fluid 60. No noticeable drops that I can see right now.
ss_lemonade
Member
With all the 60fps reports here and there, is there no 120hz support in the game?
banefirelord
Banned
Anyone rocking the 750TI here? Probably won't triple dip until I get a new card in the fall, but if it handles it nicely I might pick it a bit earlier to fool around with the video editor.
Dick Justice
Banned
Quite jaggy, but a huge step up from consoles. I don't mind when it means a near-constant 60FPS.
Felix Lighter
Member
Just finished the first mission in the city which has you driving all over the city. Performance remains rock solid. Hopefully, I can save and retry the benchmark now that I'm not starting a new game.
No it doesn't work period.
But if Precision is running it won't even progress through the menus to launch the game.
And I'd like reports on people's experience with Nvidia 3D Vision.
First impressions. I have driven around the populated city for a few minutes.
3570k @ 4.2
980GTX +150/+350
16G 2133
Game on Samsung 840 Evo SSD
Win8.1
Gsync @ 1440p
Very decent seeming port. Asset streaming seems much better than in GTA IV. I am getting around 80-100 fps most of the time. Haven't seen lower than 70 yet.
This is going to be enjoyable -->
3570k @ 4.2
980GTX +150/+350
16G 2133
Game on Samsung 840 Evo SSD
Win8.1
Gsync @ 1440p
Very decent seeming port. Asset streaming seems much better than in GTA IV. I am getting around 80-100 fps most of the time. Haven't seen lower than 70 yet.
This is going to be enjoyable -->
therealminime
Member
Ok little update, up on top of the hill looking out at the entire downtown, with everything maxed except for the advanced stuff, 1440p with 2x MSAA it drops down to about 45fps.
Corpsepyre
Banned
I wonder how 270x users will do with this one. Hoping for good performance.
The majority of people will have 60 Hz monitors, so going above that limit is irrelevant for most people.
The game can be unlocked and pushed above 60.
😢
Dick Justice
Banned
I set it to high, and I'm still getting 60FPS, at least for now. I'm guessing heavier scenes will cause drops.
Felix Lighter
Member
It does. It says I have 8 GB of VRAM with SLI GTX 970s.
Uff ,I was hoping it was like AC Unity ( good fxaa implementation)...
But yeah it's a good trade off for 60 fps rock solid.icecold1983
Member
This game is only giving me 59hz. Anyone know how to get it to give you an option for 60
Gat damn.. Using the latest drivers?
DX12 memory sharing here early.
Dick Justice
Banned
Uff ,I was hoping it was like AC Unity ( good fxaa implementation)...
It's certainly not gamebreaking. Especially if you're coming from the PS3 version like me. 1080P is a huge boon to the IQ.
ss_lemonade
Member
Oh, cool. Hopefully I won't have to drop too many settings settings on a single 780 for that.
Felix Lighter
Member
I also appears to appropriately double usage with settings as well so I believe the outcome is ultimately the same but all the numbers are just doubled.
Wag
Member
Yep, it says I have 18GB VRAM on my 3 Titans. I'm able to max out everything and still have VRAM to spare.
Port and overall performance is amazing. There are no freezes, lags or streaming textures. Everything feels and plays great. I play at 3840x2160 with everything ramped up except different AAs and I'm getting stable 35-45 fps with 40 being average.
Setup:
Asus X99-S
i7 5820K
Gigabyte GTX 980
16GB 2400Mhz RAM
Windows 10 Pro Technical Preview Build 10049
Nvidia driver 349.90
Here are my settings and VRAM usage:
Setup:
Asus X99-S
i7 5820K
Gigabyte GTX 980
16GB 2400Mhz RAM
Windows 10 Pro Technical Preview Build 10049
Nvidia driver 349.90
Here are my settings and VRAM usage:
Felix Lighter
Member
Finishing the tutorials and making a save fixes the Benchmark.
Do you mind taking screenshots of afterburner with GPU usage turned on in OSD?
Also keen to see your fps in 4K. (via DSR)
If you turn off PCSS, do you reckon you can get a solid 60?
Dick Justice
Banned
Oh man, they put Danger Zone in the game now? Goddamn son.
flaxknuckles
Member
GTA Online still looks like butt I see. And I forgot I was put in the dunce servers for blowing up people's cars, damn.
yep
7950 at 1100mhz
3570 at 4.2
I'm uploading something, have a shitload of windows open, and the game really isn't breaking a sweat at a mixture of high and very high settings it auto defaulted too. Will get numbers once I'm done uploading but it's miles better than GTA4.
Only turned off AA and Vysnc. Not a fan of them.
3570 at 4.2
I'm uploading something, have a shitload of windows open, and the game really isn't breaking a sweat at a mixture of high and very high settings it auto defaulted too. Will get numbers once I'm done uploading but it's miles better than GTA4.
Only turned off AA and Vysnc. Not a fan of them.
Oh many it runs like a dream. Unfortunately using normal textures as even just high put me 200MB over without touching anything else, but I'm running a mix of mostly very high with a few highs (sliders defaulted to a mix of 80-100% which was surprising) and I'm getting like 70-100fps :O
As soon as I was given control of Franlin my VRAM was at 1800MB so I don't think high textures will work out too great, but I'll give it a bash tomorrow to see what happens (Shadow of Mordor was fine with when it was recommending 4GB).
Also first-person is so so good! (FoV needs tweaking though.)
As soon as I was given control of Franlin my VRAM was at 1800MB so I don't think high textures will work out too great, but I'll give it a bash tomorrow to see what happens (Shadow of Mordor was fine with when it was recommending 4GB).
Also first-person is so so good! (FoV needs tweaking though.)
Felix Lighter
Member
The benchmark is actually pretty damn cool. Locked at vsynced 60. I'll give it a whirl unlocked.
yellow submarine
Member
Any impressions or close configurations to a:
GTX 670 2 GB
i7-920
6 GB ram
GTX 670 2 GB
i7-920
6 GB ram
You can select up to 144hz for the refresh rate. The benchmark is busted, but you can at least watch the frame rate as it runs. When the bench mark ends, just exit the game. It's annoying, but otherwise you get a never ending load screen and have to exit anyway. Don't bother running the benchmark until you complete the intro mission as it just will cause you to have to restart the game after the intro mission is failed.
Man, this is great. i5 4960k, 280 x, everything is high or very high and it's a rock solid 60. good job rock star.
Edit: Spoke too soon. As I tried to go back to the game after posting this, it wouldn't let me, saying that "GTA V had an unrecoverable fault, please restart" Ruh roh
Edit: Spoke too soon. As I tried to go back to the game after posting this, it wouldn't let me, saying that "GTA V had an unrecoverable fault, please restart" Ruh roh
They are basically softer and more detailed shadows. They are described more in depth here https://developer.nvidia.com/shadowworks
Mad Season
Banned
2 questions. I have everything at very high, using gtx980.
- i have half of my alloted 4 GB vid ram used. should I keep raising things until i get close to the 4GB limit?
- should FXAA be on along with MSAA?
I'm running Gsync so I don't think DSR is supported yet with SLI and Gysnc at the same time. This what you looking for?
