Of course? That will be a huge upgrade.The Bookerman said:From a Athlon 64 3000+ single core processor to that? Trust me, I will upgrade.
Of course? That will be a huge upgrade.The Bookerman said:From a Athlon 64 3000+ single core processor to that? Trust me, I will upgrade.
Boards use it, just have 2 slots.JADS said:UUugghhh
I want to overclock but I also want to use Quickpath. No USB3? Guess I will wait an other year :lol
yes, especially since you can overclock to 4.5 GHz with stock cooling.LiquidMetal14 said:Based on the charts I take it this would be a better choice over a Phenom II x6 1090T?
you would see a big improvement, almost double in some situations without even overclocking.I'm wondering what kind of upgrade i would see in rendering times (After Effects, Lightwave, Cinema 4d etc.).
Good luck getting that i7 anywhere near 5+GHZ.Minsc said:Things don't look so bad comparing it to a 3.3 ghz i7 920... until it's overclocked. Oh well, my cpu will march on for a while yet!
1 more question about a motherboard. This one here would work fine?element said:yes, especially since you can overclock to 4.5 GHz with stock cooling.
Thanks for the responses! Hopefully the motherboard is not too expensive as I plan on getting the 2600k unless the motherboard is too much. Unfortunately I am on a budget right now.element said:no. that is a 1156 motherboard. sandy bridge is 1155. the embargo was lifted today, and technically not official yet until CES. Give it a week or so for the cpu and mobo show up on newegg.
hteng said:the new high end MSI, ASUS, Sager, Alienwares will be utilizing it. BUT, you must make sure it supports switchable graphics card, or else it's really nothing more than just a processor speed upgrade. The speed is not really utilized nowadays, even my QM740 is plentiful for games nowadays.
the real power of these new chips are the IGPs, when not using intensive gaming, it will switch to the IGP to conserve battery. Gaming notebooks nowadays has very shitty battery life and this new tech will help tremendously. you get the best of both worlds.
Mr_Brit said:Good luck getting that i7 anywhere near 5+GHZ.
If these are the entry level price friendly entries, I can't wait to see the more hardcore pieces. That and AMD's offering later this year. I am ready to pull the trigger on this processor though. I just got a second hand 2 core athlon and already have the itch to upgrade to a gaming class setup. I will have to settle or save for a month to get a Radeon 6970 but it will be worth it.Wallach said:I can't really justify this considering my i5-750, but I like what I see. In particular the OC headroom and temps seem pretty damn impressive. Can't wait to see what people manage to squeeze out of these chips.
Good qustion I'd like to know an answer to as well. And on one of the other reviews for and 1156 motherboard I read that if you have a PCI card (for testing) the video will not output and there is no documentation on it. The regular DVI/VGA out worked but if I were a casual not in the know I would think the board was broke. I hope these sets actually work like they're meant to.The Bookerman said:Question: If I wanna use the onboard GPU, am I forced to buy the H67 board?
Cause I'd buy a GPU a bit later.
I'm not the expert but based on the answer to my own question it seems like you will need a new motherboard for this piece. As far as your performance goes, even from my readings, your spec looks good. It would be an upgrade though to go to this but it doesn't seem like you are that inferior. I'm not the expert though I just happen to be doing a lot of reading on this as I'm upgrading soon.FJ0372 said:Hey guys, was just wondering whether its worth/possible it to upgrade from I7 920 OC'ed to 4 Ghz? (with corsair H50 I think).
That should have been replaced years ago.ascii42 said:Hmm. Maybe when Apple gets these I'll finally replace my 2005 Power Mac G5. I could replace my Vaio, but I think it's got a couple more years left.
The Bookerman said:I've been doing some reading and .... Is this right? The onboard GPU can only be used through micro-ATX boards? WTF is this bullshit?
What's up with this shit?
It still works just fine, but support is dwindling. The damn thing cost me $1800 bucks, so I ought to get a decent life span out of it. 6 years is a long time though.Mr_Brit said:That should have been replaced years ago.
CPU's are fine... it's the Motherboards that are going through my budget of a 1000$.Outdoor Miner said:i5 2500K is a beast @ it's price range. Good god.
Yeah Apple needs to hurry the hell up >=[EmSeta said:Bring on the new MacBook Pros!
Outdoor Miner said:i5 2500K is a beast @ it's price range. Good god.
Ace 8095 said:Whats the expected price for the 2500K with motherboard?
Ace 8095 said:Whats the expected price for the 2500K with motherboard?
toasty_T said:Time to put my Q6600 to rest.
EmSeta said:Bring on the new MacBook Pros!
Durante said:Desktop performance isn't really that impressive. Some more OC headroom, but lower memory bandwidth compared to the triple channel i7s. And the inability to do bus overclocking hurts.
For laptops OTOH the improvements are awesome. Power scaling from 10W to 89W is very nice.
Much greater OC headroom, you can get 1GHZ on stock cooling. Memory bandwidth isn't even close to being an issue on dual channel setups so I don't see how you can claim that being a downside. Bus overclocking was a waste of time anyways, multiplier OCing is quicker and easier and gets you pretty much exactly the same results and also means that you don't have to OC every other component on your PC when OCing your CPU which means you don't have to stability test any other components and also means that you can get cheaper memory instead of splurging on 'Hyper 1337zzzzz hacking 2000MHZ memory'.Durante said:Desktop performance isn't really that impressive. Some more OC headroom, but lower memory bandwidth compared to the triple channel i7s. And the inability to do bus overclocking hurts.
For laptops OTOH the improvements are awesome. Power scaling from 10W to 89W is very nice.
I think he, like me, is referring to the 13".brain_stew said:Its never really been a CPU upgrade which the MBP have been in great need of. Its the graphics which suck.