Snah said:The most hilarious thing about this situation is that Killzone delivered the closest accurate representation of nearly all the E3 2005 trailers. No one was expecting that considering it was probably the most absurd trailer at the show that year.
Sure, you can find minor details (such as texture quality on the clothing, more rounded polygons, etc) that look better in the CG film, but ultimately it really doesn't matter. The game catches the look, the feel, and artistic quality almost perfectly.
And I agree with Phil when he said that some parts of it look better than the trailer. I feel the overall interaction of the enemies being hit by bullets is better, I think some of the animation is better, the lighting is a lot more impressive to me, and the overall environmental effects / artistic design is better.... So yeah, I actually think the E3 2007 trailer looks better overall in terms of an aesthetic sense.
It looks like a gritty blade runner in a war theater setting...looks incredible.
You need to put your account up to it or else this is a baseless bet.Trax416 said:I am going on the record right now.
Killzone 2 will get a 7, 8 at the very most. Someone bookmark this.
Killzone 2's graphics looked amazing. However that was it. The AI looked like AI i played against in Goldeneye. It showed nothing innovative. It showed the typical, machine gun/rocket launcher crap.
So yes Killzone 2 looks great, but I guarantee with a game that good looking it has almost no processing power for anything else.
msdstc said:I know what you mean... it caught the feel, sooo amazingly, it just looks/feels so cinematic, adding in more animations will add to that, but the fact thtat you have to LOOK for the details that are worse than the CG, makes it incredible as is.
Trax416 said:I am going on the record right now.
Killzone 2 will get a 7, 8 at the very most. Someone bookmark this.
Killzone 2's graphics looked amazing. However that was it. The AI looked like AI i played against in Goldeneye. It showed nothing innovative. It showed the typical, machine gun/rocket launcher crap. The game play also looked extremely boring.
So yes Killzone 2 looks great, but I guarantee with a game that good looking it has almost no processing power for anything else.
Trax416 said:I am going on the record right now.
Killzone 2 will get a 7, 8 at the very most. Someone bookmark this.
Killzone 2's graphics looked amazing. However that was it. The AI looked like AI i played against in Goldeneye. It showed nothing innovative. It showed the typical, machine gun/rocket launcher crap. The game play also looked extremely boring.
So yes Killzone 2 looks great, but I guarantee with a game that good looking it has almost no processing power for anything else.
Trax416 said:I am going on the record right now.
Killzone 2 will get a 7, 8 at the very most. Someone bookmark this.
Killzone 2's graphics looked amazing. However that was it. The AI looked like AI i played against in Goldeneye. It showed nothing innovative. It showed the typical, machine gun/rocket launcher crap. The game play also looked extremely boring.
So yes Killzone 2 looks great, but I guarantee with a game that good looking it has almost no processing power for anything else.
Trax416 said:I am going on the record right now.
Killzone 2 will get a 7, 8 at the very most. Someone bookmark this.
Killzone 2's graphics looked amazing. However that was it. The AI looked like AI i played against in Goldeneye. It showed nothing innovative. It showed the typical, machine gun/rocket launcher crap. The game play also looked extremely boring.
So yes Killzone 2 looks great, but I guarantee with a game that good looking it has almost no processing power for anything else.
Snah said:Haha.
I have a feeling Killzone will be getting GOTFY awards across the board when it releases.
You don't have amazing artistic vision, design, a huge budget only to just fall incredibly flat on the gameplay. GG knows what they're doing. Killzone 1's graphics were good at the time, but they most certainly weren't what I would consider amazing. It never was the prettiest game of its time and had many engine faults. Killzone 2 when it releases will probably be the most impressive looking title ever, and by all indications the framerate is already rock steady.
I don't know why people are even questioning the gameplay. With all the little touches they've made to the engine, the gameplay looks fantastic, and I think they're obviously holding back on many of the actual gameplay details. This trailer was mostly to show that Sony was serious with this title. It'll be a blockbuster, and perhaps a defining title of this entire generation much like Halo was last gen.
Core407 said:Isn't it still in pre-alpha? Give 'em some credit FFS...
msdstc said:I know what you mean... it caught the feel, sooo amazingly, it just looks/feels so cinematic, adding in more animations will add to that, but the fact thtat you have to LOOK for the details that are worse than the CG, makes it incredible as is.
Hunter D said:It is a big difference. If they were even close to matching the trailer on a tech level PC fanboys would be cutting their own throats with their DX10 cards.
Wollan said:Like the game director playing the game live in front of the crowds? Anyways, here's a extended gameplay trailer:
http://gamevideos.com/video/id/13133
maynerd said:I think it looks comparable, quite good actually the AI is piss poor though.
BloodAdo said:Now just fix the AI, and the fire effects...and GOTY 2008 is in the bag
CrushDance said:Hay guyz did U know gametrailerd dida comparison videouh!? Who woulda think!
Speaking of which. Can we get some light back into the game and get rid of those damn ugly generic looking helghast? The cloaks are what gave them their "OMGWTFBBQ scary" feel.
distrbnce said:Wow.
You know, I didn't think (just from memory) that the new trailer came very close to the 05 one. But with these (possibly carefully picked) screenshots, I'd say it surpasses it on the majority of them.
Agree, the fire, and some textures need work, but I have absolutely no doubt that 6 more months is plenty of time to polish it up.
Amazing, can't believe I'll get to play through it some day.
CrushDance said:Hay guyz did U know gametrailerd dida comparison videouh!? Who woulda think!
Speaking of which. Can we get some light back into the game and get rid of those damn ugly generic looking helghast? The cloaks are what gave them their "OMGWTFBBQ scary" feel.
My thoughts exactly. The fire is still looking a bit last-gen ... but there's time and everything else is freakin' amazing.zoku88 said:They got pretty close. The biggest differences are in the fire.
callous said:My thoughts exactly. The fire is still looking a bit last-gen ... but there's time and everything else is freakin' amazing.
"The cloaks are what gave them their "OMGWTFBBQ scary" feel.
Kid Chameleon said:Was just thinking - has Sony given a release date yet?