Really? Stop with the BS, esically since Microsoft has revealed more first party games than Sony has.
I was partly joking, as well as being sarcastic at the whole notion of "MS revealed more games, they are more games focused than Sony!"
Part of the whole game-focused proposition delivered by Sony wasn't simply on no.of games announced, it was about the architecture of the system which they said, prioritised speed, ease of development, the experience associated with gaming such as sharing, streaming, etc.
And we see that materialise in superior load/install times. That was clearly something Sony took to heart and improved significantly to improve the game experience.
The whole logic of 'MS/Sony is more focused on games because X number of games got announced" is faulty anyway. If MS stops making games after 5 years, whereas Sony continues for 8 years, doesn't that somehow make Sony more game-focused in the end? If tomorrow, they one-up each other in games announcements, does that make each other more focused on games for those few months before getting one-upped again?