WolfForager
Member
They should reset console name to simply "Playstation" and come out with a new version every 3 years.
That's why they choose to be pc gamers. Lots of console gamers just want a box that will play all games coming out the next 5+ years.
The suggestion with a .5 upgrade is that you're NOT being forced to upgrade to carry on playing. A lack of resistance to new shiny toys isn't a gun to the back of your head.
But you then say you'd be happy with a PS5 instead, which would force you to upgrade to play the latest games. Wut.
That's why they choose to be pc gamers. Lots of console gamers just want a box that will play all games coming out the next 5+ years.
I guess a new pricing would become something like:
Year 0: Console A - $399 (launch)
Year 1: Console A - $399
Year 2: Console A - $349
Year 3: Console A - $299 / Console B - $399
Year 4: Console A - $249 / Console B - $399
Year 5: Console A - $199 / Console B - $349
Year 6: Console A - $149 / Console B - $299 / Console C - $399
Year 7: Console B - $249 / Console C - $399
Year 8: Console B - $199 / Console C - $349
Year 9: Console B - $149 / Console C - $299 / Console D - $399
...
Haha holy shit.
I still need to gather my thoughts on this.
I guess a new pricing would become something like:
Year 0: Console A - $399 (launch)
Year 1: Console A - $399
Year 2: Console A - $349
Year 3: Console A - $299 / Console B - $399
Year 4: Console A - $249 / Console B - $399
Year 5: Console A - $199 / Console B - $349
Year 6: Console A - $149 / Console B - $299 / Console C - $399
Year 7: Console B - $249 / Console C - $399
Year 8: Console B - $199 / Console C - $349
Year 9: Console B - $149 / Console C - $299 / Console D - $399
...
Who's this Zoeits, dude? heck the post histroy. Somebody that works at Sony (supposedly)?
Yeah but supporting a soon-to-release platform doesn't double that development, if anything it should be pretty minimal. Assets have reached crazy levels already, we are at a certain plateau now, look at Uncharted 4.At the end the big AAA games takes a shit ton of years to make even with an established engine.
He told us TLG will be revealed a month before E3.
He might know some stuff but it doesn't mean he knows EVERYTHING, that's a common mistake people make about insiders all the time, even proved insiders are often wrong (C-boat anyone?)
I can see this play out as a major misunderstanding. I.e. PS4.5 actualy is PS4 slim with some miner Hardware uppings like HDMI 2.0 and an UHD BD drive.
I don't get it, of course it might run games in 4K, but no way in hell it'll run at a smooth 60fps, so what's the point?
Playing similar looking games at similar fps but at a higher resolution?? And all that for another 400-500$, L O L ?
Even worse, releasing that updated PS4 around the same time they're trying to push PSVR at a cheap 500$?? Seriously? That might sink the Playstation ship for good.
Why not wait two years more and bring out the PS5 with real 4K and even better PSVR performance? I'm not sure it's a gamble worth taking for Sony.
MS, sure why not, they need to try something as they don't have VR and they'll just fall back on Windows 10 Xbox gaming if it fails.
Well, we have kotaku with their article *and* him confirming it.
With CBoat there were threads only because of him which is not the case here.
I guess a new pricing would become something like:
Year 0: Console A - $399 (launch)
Year 1: Console A - $399
Year 2: Console A - $349
Year 3: Console A - $299 / Console B - $399
Year 4: Console A - $249 / Console B - $399
Year 5: Console A - $199 / Console B - $349
Year 6: Console A - $149 / Console B - $299 / Console C - $399
Year 7: Console B - $249 / Console C - $399
Year 8: Console B - $199 / Console C - $349
Year 9: Console B - $149 / Console C - $299 / Console D - $399
...
Maybe this has to be the way.
Here is the funny part. Mot even the fury x and gtx 980ti run the new games at highest settings in 4k and 60 fpsI don't get it, of course it might run games in 4K, but no way in hell it'll run at a smooth 60fps, so what's the point
MS, sure why not, they need to try something as they don't have VR and they'll just fall back on Windows 10 Xbox gaming if it fails.
I guess a new pricing would become something like:
Year 0: Console A - $399 (launch)
Year 1: Console A - $399
Year 2: Console A - $349
Year 3: Console A - $299 / Console B - $399
Year 4: Console A - $249 / Console B - $399
Year 5: Console A - $199 / Console B - $349
Year 6: Console A - $149 / Console B - $299 / Console C - $399
Year 7: Console B - $249 / Console C - $399
Year 8: Console B - $199 / Console C - $349
Year 9: Console B - $149 / Console C - $299 / Console D - $399
...
The PS4 is selling at a better pace than the PS2. This doesnt make any sense.
Well, there's a lot people already jealous just after rumors, without knowing actual specs and difference. There will be a lot more when sony will made official announcement (IF sony will announce it)-you don't have to fork over more money!
-your existing ps4 will still be the base for ps4 games!
-this is not a new gen, they have 30m+ userbase on existing ps4 consoles!
-there are only some issues if you're jealous!
I don't see how this would expand userbases though, surely you're still going to be selling the high end to the early adoptors who will abandon the lesser model?I thought from game developer's point of view.
Maybe that reset we get every generation is too much for them in today's circumstances.
PS4 is selling phenomenally, but they still don't have target audience they'd like.
And that's only for very big games, think about all the variety you could get without reseting of userbase. There would be audience for every concept. At least much easier than through any launch period.
I still don't like the sound design of all this, I'm just thinking....
Nailed it right on the head, you buy a console with the mindset that it's fixed so you don't need to upgrade it to play current games at higher frame rates or resolution. This eliminates that aspect and makes it seems like consoles will evolve into pcs.Ok well this has me legit surprised and tbh I don't think it's a good idea for the same reasons as the Xbox One revision. Consoles has pros and cons, the main pro being that it's fixed hardware, this eliminates that.
I guess it makes sense for VR but a fragmented user base is bad for everyone imo.
Will still buy it tho :/
I thought from game developer's point of view.
Maybe that reset we get every generation is too much for them in today's circumstances.
PS4 is selling phenomenally, but they still don't have target audience they'd like.
And that's only for very big games, think about all the variety you could get without reseting the userbase. There would be audience for every concept. At least much easier than through any launch period from past times. .
I still don't like the sound of all this, I'm just thinking....
No it wouldn't.
Some of the biggest visual downgrades on consoles take place with things like shadows,draw distance and overall geometry detail because the CPU can't feed the GPU fast enough.
PS4 is hideously CPU bound in some areas.
I don't mind them uprgading in general. But I only got the PS4 a few months ago in preparation for UC4 and PSVR, but could have waited a little longer with the purchase. So hearing about a possible boost for PSVR now that I already got the PS4 sucks.
I have no problem with them going forward with hardware upgrades like this, but if I had known I would have chosen a different entry point for this "last genereation". But maybe I was too blind to see it coming, silly me.
It will work pretty easily for any non-locked variables. Such as frame rate or variable resolution. You'd expect those games to just hit the top bar with no dips.
A tiny slim version with bigger hard drive, proper 4K output and 4K bluray disc support. It would probably be great but I would still not buy it.
I think some of you are taking the 4K part a bit too strictly.
It will feature a 4K Blu-ray player.
It will be capable to run some games in 4K.
Most big games will likely aim for 1080p at 60fps w/good amount of effects.
I guess a new pricing would become something like:
Year 0: Console A - $399 (launch)
Year 1: Console A - $399
Year 2: Console A - $349
Year 3: Console A - $299 / Console B - $399
Year 4: Console A - $249 / Console B - $399
Year 5: Console A - $199 / Console B - $349
Year 6: Console A - $149 / Console B - $299 / Console C - $399
Year 7: Console B - $249 / Console C - $399
Year 8: Console B - $199 / Console C - $349
Year 9: Console B - $149 / Console C - $299 / Console D - $399
...
Yup.
Been said countless of times in this thread and people are still with the "no way I can play U4 at 4k!", you won't.
I think some of you are taking the 4K part a bit too strictly.
It will feature a 4K Blu-ray player.
It will be capable to run some games in 4K.
Most big games will likely aim for 1080p at 60fps w/good amount of effects.
I'm pretty skeptic about him, but I think he said it will support 4K gaming, doesn't necessarily mean high end AAA games.Yes but that Zoetis leaker suggested that it will play the latest games in 4K. Can't find the post.