The fact that people are consistently bringing up Beyond Good and Evil should be telling us something.
Titles rated E (Everyone) have content that may be suitable for ages 6 and older. Titles in this category may contain minimal cartoon, fantasy or mild violence, and/or infrequent use of mild language.
can 3 year olds even read?
So the enjoyment of a game diminishes if you can't visually immerse yourself in said character? Minority gamers don't seem to have that issue.
I think people bring up Beyong G&E because it's the most similar example to Zelda and features a female heroine. Also, it's good for a 3 years old. Though i guess he could get Rhapsody, or Atelier Annie.
Cornet, Shion Uzuki, Samus, Regina (and most SH heroines), April Ryan, Aya Brea, Aigis, Monica, Chris, Jill Valentine, Terra and Celes and another bunch of females from various jrpg (Such Annie from Atelier, Riza from Rudra, Virginia from WA3, some DQ games), Heather, Maya Amano, Lyn, Aqua, April Ryan, Yuna, Lenneth and Silmeria/Alicia, Ayame... the first names that come up in my head.
You may argue that not all of them are good or whatever, the point is that there are a lot of female heroines around.
She is 3 and shouldn't be playing video games anyway. Especially a game like Wind Waker, there is no way she can comprehend what is going on or solve the puzzles on her own.
Edit: she is probably just watching him play.. whatever.
can 3 year olds even read?
Is it just me, or you guys are making a fuss over nothing?
That is the most outrageously wrong reason to forbid a children from playing anything. I understand not letting a child near it if there's questionable/violent/etc. content (and the end of Ganondorf's battle might count), but forbidding it because she MIGHT not understand it? Children crave and need intellectual stimuli. Some of my fondest childhood memories are from books and movies I realized I could not fully comprehend because of my age. I learned to read at age two; I guess by your logic I shouldn't have been let near a book or comic?
I promise you she's not still playing it. The whole idea of having big plans to raise your kid the way you were raised is comical and narcissistic.
Also, does she have to boot up a Dolphin emulator to play it? LOL
She is 3 and shouldn't be playing video games anyway. Especially a game like Wind Waker, there is no way she can comprehend what is going on or solve the puzzles on her own.
Edit: she is probably just watching him play.. whatever.
As a parent of a 3.5 year old daughter, this is a moronic thing to say. To say there's no way she can comprehend whats going on just shows you know nothing about children. They are extremely impressionable at that age and have a mind-blowing capacity to learn and understand things. There are plenty of 'games' and interactive products out there that are designed to enrich and educate, some of them are fantastic.
As a dad, I do understand the value of what this father is doing and I think it's brilliant.
I meant solving the puzzles and beating the game by herself.
If he's anything like me, he asks questions along the way "why do you think Link needs this item or what can he do with this item", or "can you spot a word that starts with L" or "which way do you think we should sail the ship" or "why do you think that character is upset". Of course the 3.5 year old is not playing it by herself.
the girl will be ridiculed by classmates when she will be older because of her claims that link is a girl.
Yeah, that's what it should be.
But often it's not.
Say a marriage goes to shit. Who will get to pay the bills? Almost all the time the man of course. Who is keeping the children? The woman of course, almost all the time. And the man isn't even able to see his kids unless the woman allows him to do so. Is this equalism? Is this fair? Not at all. And that's not even new.
Genital mutilation done to young boys is totally allowed in my country, even in case of religious reasons. Of course it's forbidden when done to girls (which is totally fine of course, but it shouldn't be allowed in any case).
Divorce is a hypothetical situation?
http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/html/custody/fathers.html
Like I already wrote: It's allowed in my country for fucking religious reasons by LAW. Do you understand how crazy this is?
And even the so called "health reasons" are almost all the time phimosis, which can be treated without genital mutilation, but who cares, they are boys.
Man, can we quit getting the "bu-bu-but T!" thing? It's got a far lower rating in Europe and it's a guideline, not THE LAW.
The fact that people are consistently bringing up Beyond Good and Evil should be telling us something.
Man, can we quit getting the "bu-bu-but T!" thing? It's got a far lower rating in Europe and it's a guideline, not THE LAW.
Oh yeah, I commented on that too (though Gurumin on PSP might not be bad) and do think it's part of why suggesting something INSTEAD of Wind Waker is bad (and thinking about it, the other part is she likes that game so let her have fun with it), this is more a separate pet peeve of treating ratings as the law rather than a guideline, depending on the kid or how absurd the rating is I could trust even an M rated one with a 9 year old. But I'm thinking of something patently ridiculous like Mortal Kombat, I think stuff like Call of Duty, while not as gory, is actually a lot more problematic especially if online's factored in.The fact that people are consistently bringing up Beyond Good and Evil as the only real example should be telling us something.
No. People are confusing "There's not enough female hero options for girls" with "there's no female hero options for girls", and point to one game extremely consistently as the 'solution', which kind of proves the point that there's not enough female hero options for girls.
I thought he intended for her to play through it herself. I said nothing about books or comics, I was talking about video games. In general its not good to get kids hooked on TV or video games at a young age. Giving her books would be a GOOD thing to do.
And that's what is so sad and hilariousas i've already expressed in this thread, the gender activism of the father could be replaced with any other social activism issue or ideology, and his editing of the work would still look unacceptable to me.