I want to just say one thing, not aimed at anyone in general, but in regards to how some folks who happen to have bits & pieces of inside knowledge is treated at times. (Sneakers, Matt, etc )
Nobody's perfect. Even the best 'insiders' have faulty or outdated information, even when they work IN THE COMPANY ITSELF. ( DemonNite got the announcement timing of Bloodborne off, he teased it at TGS )
But acknowledging that they're insiders mean that treating what they share with a measured sense of belief, even if some of the stuff could be wrong. If it's wrong, we accept that as one of the stuff they got wrong and move on. But it should not be a harpoon to say "I think insider X is full of bullshit because they've been wrong these few times!" Of course, if they are constantly wrong after a certain point, then yeah. Their credibility is out the window.
To me, I get that some of you feel that certain insiders feel like they have an agenda, if they're somewhat negative, etc. But EVEN if they have an agenda, there's a big difference between agenda-driven lies and agenda-driven truths/half-truths/etc. And that is assuming IF.
Personally, I think it's bad to automatically attribute a certain malice to any kind of sharing. For better or worse, this gen is trying for MS, for their company has gone through a lot of ups and downs. It's not strange that a lot of financial drama could be going on within.