• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NeoGAF's Essential RPGs - 2015 edition

Tabris

Member
27 and 37 should be 1 and 2.

This is demographically correct for GAF (a lot of Nintendo only players voting, as well as some that may not have experienced the SNES/PSX/PS2 generations), I just disagree with it so much.
 
I feel like after I made a decent starting attempt at a list (it was quite a challenge to come up with 17 in any way possible and I put VP2 on it to make 18), I don't think I have a gut feeling on what an RPG is anymore.

The line is so blurred, and perhaps it is better that way because trying to make a great product under specific rules and guidelines doesn't always lead to better results.


I will admit, to be fair, that I do have some difficulty in calling a very select few titles as games and that their overall scope blurs the line between game and either novel or animated movie. That's an entirely different discussion of course, but at the same time, if the lines are so blurred, then I don't see any true problem with putting Zelda titles or Tower of Doom on a list either. I don't think a game should be punished for presenting something different.
 

kswiston

Member
I will admit, to be fair, that I do have some difficulty in calling a very select few titles as games and that their overall scope blurs the line between game and either novel or animated movie. That's an entirely different discussion of course, but at the same time, if the lines are so blurred, then I don't see any problem with putting Zelda titles or Tower of Doom on this list either.

I never really saw the argument for the Zelda series being RPGs. Other than being set in a medieval world, what do they do that is RPG like?
 

djtiesto

is beloved, despite what anyone might say
I used to be a pain in the as purist in regard to the term "RPG", because I'm a very heavy P&P player, and I played them before I knew anything of video game RPGs. But I've come to understand RPG in video games these days is just a term to describe a certain type of logistics-based gameplay.
I basically think it's easier to adopt a more welcoming definition of RPG just to avoid endless semantic arguments.

It's funny how I'm just the opposite way. My first time ever playing a pen and paper RPG was last Fall, yet I've been playing console/PC RPGs since I was 7 or 8 years old. To me, RPGs were always games that were menu-driven (and 'action RPG' being those with more direct input, 'strategy RPG' where the combat was menu-driven but more position-based), with character stats that improved as you played the game. The dialogue tree aspect was never something that really interested me...
 

Jisgsaw

Member
27 and 37 should be 1 and 2.

This is demographically correct for GAF (a lot of Nintendo only players voting, as well as some that may not have experienced the SNES/PSX/PS2 generations), I just disagree with it so much.

What?
There aren't that much Nintendo titles in the top 40 (and I actually don't remember a single nintendo only list in this thread), and over half of the top 40 is from the SNES/PSX/PS2 era...

The top is heavily biased towards consoles, and a lot towards jRPGs, but not the way you described it...
 
What?
There aren't that much Nintendo titles in the top 40 (and I actually don't remember a single nintendo only list in this thread), and over half of the top 40 is from the SNES/PSX/PS2 era...

The top is heavily biased towards consoles, and a lot towards jRPGs, but not the way you described it...
It's Tabris, probably still salty about the Broncos or something.

edit: only 10 are even on Nintendo systems, and of those 3 of them (including two in the top 4) are 3rd party
 

IntelliHeath

As in "Heathcliff"
27 and 37 should be 1 and 2.

This is demographically correct for GAF (a lot of Nintendo only players voting, as well as some that may not have experienced the SNES/PSX/PS2 generations), I just disagree with it so much.

I can't really blame most of people for not playing Suikoden 2 since it's pretty rare game Fortunately for many people, they finally released S2 on PSN so people can play the game for cheap price.

Edited: Only 10 out of 40 games got released on Nintendo systems.
 

KAL2006

Banned
I tried Chrono Trigger 2 years ago on DS and just couldn't get into it. The only thing I liked about it was its soundtrack, I stopped playing around halfway through.

For reference my top JRPGs are

1. Suikoden II
2. Final Fantasy VII
3. Vandal Hearts

I still have yet to play Xenogears and Persona 4 which are considered some of the top JRPGs.
 

Shengar

Member
Calling a game like Valkyria Chronicles is a one thing, passable, understandable, but calling Fallout, FALLOUT is just plain ignorance.
 

hemtae

Member
Did anyone play Fallout 1 and 2 here?

How hard is it? Any protips and advices for me?

Save often. Don't go for a dumb character until you know what you're doing. Tag a combat skill as tagging works a bit differently than in FO3/NV iirc. Save really often.
 

leroidys

Member
27 and 37 should be 1 and 2.

This is demographically correct for GAF (a lot of Nintendo only players voting, as well as some that may not have experienced the SNES/PSX/PS2 generations), I just disagree with it so much.

Disagree. I don't see where you're coming from here TBH. Number 1 has been on playstation systems for like 20 years. Number 2 is exclusively on playstation platforms. The sad truth is, most PSX RPGs suck by todays standards. Suikoden II I'll give you (27), but Xenogears (37) is just an awful game by almost any metric.
 
Disagree. I don't see where you're coming from here TBH. Number 1 has been on playstation systems for like 20 years. Number 2 is exclusively on playstation platforms. The sad truth is, most PSX RPGs suck by todays standards. Suikoden II I'll give you (27), but Xenogears (37) is just an awful game by almost any metric.

As far as I'm considered JRPGs didn't start to age well until around 2000. That's when developers stopped dropping a lot of the old stupid janky conventions (high frequency random battles) of the genre as well as unskippable long cutscenes before a tough boss battle.
 

Mulgrok

Member
Did anyone play Fallout 1 and 2 here?

How hard is it? Any protips and advices for me?

Depends on what you consider hard...because they can be beat without killing anything. Although, combat is pretty much a gamble at very low and high levels on the harder difficulties.

A lot of options are only visible if your character has the supported skills, perks, attributes, prior decisions, karma, equipped gear, gender, reputation, and order in which you visit locations/do tasks.
 
Games like Secret of Mana / Evermore, Illusion of Gaia, etc. are action hack and slash RPG's. I consider these to be WRPG's.

Probably the craziest opinion about the topic. Equivalent to saying that american football is football, and rugby is soccer. As the person has never seen a game of soccer and has only heard the name when attached to Pepsi commercials.
 
You managed to squeeze a lot of wrong into less than 100 characters here.

Edit: It feels like there is a lot of high end crazy on this page from several ppl

Well it's the truth. Of course there were some games like Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy VI and VII that have aged well. But the majority of JRPGs from the 90s were riddled with high random encounters, simplisitic battle systems, sharp difficulty curves, bad translations, and unskippable cutscenes. This is more so true from the first half of the decade than the latter half though.
 

Zukuu

Banned
It's trending up in these threads. And being voted the 34th best RPG of all time is nothing to sneeze at. I imagine it will go up even higher next time.
With the last gen fading more and more out, I doubt more people will get around to play it. I don't see it ever being re-released either.

I keep my PS3 around just for the ability to replay NieR, when I feel like it.
And USF4 sometimes.
 

leroidys

Member
As far as I'm considered JRPGs didn't start to age well until around 2000. That's when developers stopped dropping a lot of the old stupid janky conventions (high frequency random battles) of the genre as well as unskippable long cutscenes before a tough boss battle.

This is the worst ;_;. I recently bought Golden Sun on Wii U VC just to have save states for this purpose.

You managed to squeeze a lot of wrong into less than 100 characters here.

Edit: It feels like there is a lot of high end crazy on this page from several ppl

Opinions. How do they work?
 

Ivory Samoan

Gold Member
Did anyone play Fallout 1 and 2 here?

How hard is it? Any protips and advices for me?
I found Fallout 1 harder, you have to reserve your ammo etc more, but it's very manageable.
Fallout 2 is the better game though IMO, more voice acting too.... feels more 'modern'.

Be careful how you spec... no respecs if I recall correctly (could be wrong/modded now though).
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
The sad truth is, most PSX RPGs suck by todays standards. Suikoden II I'll give you (27), but Xenogears (37) is just an awful game by almost any metric.
This post is so much wrong, it's borderline offensive. :p

Well it's the truth. Of course there were some games like Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy VI and VII that have aged well. But the majority of JRPGs from the 90s were riddled with high random encounters, simplisitic battle systems, sharp difficulty curves, bad translations, and unskippable cutscenes. This is more so true from the first half of the decade than the latter half though.
And yet despite all that, they're still better than modern JRPGs. Says a lot.
 

Mephala

Member
I'm a little disappointed but not surprised that I don't see Shadowruns Dragonfall yet. I hope it is at least above 100.
 

kswiston

Member
I think that most of the 2D titles from the PS1 era aged fine. Some of the 3D titles are a bit clunky, but that is true of games from that era in general.
 

kiyoaki

Member
I'm a little disappointed but not surprised that I don't see Shadowruns Dragonfall yet. I hope it is at least above 100.
I doubt it. I put it on my list, but I've seen very few other mentions. Perhaps over time it will gain some popularity, especially with the old school CRPG crowd, as the series continues to expand.
 

kswiston

Member
Shadowrun: Dragonfall is in the top 80.

I think that is pretty good for a game that most people haven't had a chance to play yet. I'm not sure how well Dragonfall will do in future lists if Shadowrun games continue to be pumped out a brisk pace. These sorts of lists typically favour more unique games.
 
I have a hard time seeing Mass Effect as a legit RPG but people are VERY loose with the term these days ( even calling Demons / Dark a JRPG lol ). Its like calling Tony Hawk Pro Skater a platformer. You are, if you are extremely loose with the perimeters of the genre, technically correct ... but yeh I wouldn't say that. Mass Effect is a TPS / Adventure with some very, very light RPG mechanics like skill point allocation and such.

I see some obvious problems. But yeh, its more of a popularity contest with these types of things. The Souls games are currently popular, so they of course rank higher then old classics like Earthbound or whatever.
 

Apenheul

Member
27 and 37 should be 1 and 2.

This is demographically correct for GAF (a lot of Nintendo only players voting, as well as some that may not have experienced the SNES/PSX/PS2 generations), I just disagree with it so much.
Xenogears got mixed reactions; some people found it great and others thought it was completely boring, and Suikoden 2 I'd personally agree is top-10 material but its placement isn't surprising given how rare the game is in its original form. This is nothing to do with platform bias.
 

kiyoaki

Member
Shadowrun: Dragonfall is in the top 80.

I think that is pretty good for a game that most people haven't had a chance to play yet. I'm not sure how well Dragonfall will do in future lists if Shadowrun games continue to be pumped out a brisk pace. These sorts of lists typically favour more unique games.

Oh, that's not too bad then for a fairly recent game, on a mostly console-centric board. I think that the series going forward will help the older installments getting continued exposure, but that's just an intuition. I'll just have to see how the SR games will be ranked two or three years from now.
 

kswiston

Member
I have posted #41-45. If anyone would like to write a 80-125 word summary for Kingdom Hearts II, I would appreciate it.


Hopefully I will be able to add those remaining 5 games in the Top 50 today. The cutoff for the top 50 was 30 points this time around. Unfortunately we had 5 games tied with 30 points, and only ranks 48-50 to put them in. Since none of them received a 3pt vote, I will have to go back through the votes and count honorable mentions.
 

kswiston

Member

That was still the best attempt at a spin-off thread.


So I went through Honourable mentions votes, and Paper Mario (N64) and Tales of Symphonia are exactly tied for #50. I am going to make an executive decision and bump Paper Mario out of the top 50. The sequel is already on the list, while Tales hasn't been represented yet. Sorry PM fans.
 

kswiston

Member
Full Top 50 is up minus summaries for Tales of Symphonia and Kingdom Hearts II.

Anyone interested in writing 80-125 words on either of those?
 

Thores

Member
The work you've done this far has been fantastic, and I'm still looking forward to the full list!

There's no rush cause it's pretty clear you've got a lot going on, but Im wondering if there's a broad ETA for the next batch?
 

kswiston

Member
I'll post the extended top 100 this weekend. My workplace had a ministry inspection recently, so I have been in crunch mode for the past couple of weeks.
 
Top Bottom