Good Job Bob
Member
Yeah this isn't going to confuse consumers at all.
Nintendo is clearly on a mission to confuse the shit out of consumers as much as possible.
Yeah this isn't going to confuse consumers at all.
I thought it resembled more like a slice of cake.
So...people will just ignore the sticker on the handheld box?
I am not sure why people are pissed about it though, it is strange but it changes absolutely nothing for current 3DS owners or those expecting to buy one unless I am missing something here.
I'm not livid but I would have loved a nonshit 2DS with better battery life since I don't care about 3D at all.I am not sure why people are pissed about it though, it is strange but it changes absolutely nothing for current 3DS owners or those expecting to buy one unless I am missing something here.
I don't know why you all keep whining about this, it's meant to be a Pokemon machine for 7 year old kids.
Should be cheaper than $129 then no? I mean you can get an a cheap Android tablet for around $70 bucks. Something decent like the Kindle Fire isn't much more expensive either.
How is this thing heavier than a 3DS?
Also: Apparently it's just one big screen under the plastic frame. If true, that would be one weird aspect, shitty screen.
Posted in the other thread.
I wonder if you guys were so vocal at the release of the DS lite, DSi, and DSi XL. I'd imagine not though. It's pretty in vogue to shit on Nintendo for any reason these days.Nintendo is clearly on a mission to confuse the shit out of consumers as much as possible.
It's basically a regular 3DS without the 3D screen, in a new shell that doesn't scratch itself.
Posted in the other thread.
Yeah this isn't going to confuse consumers at all.
Also, I guess this confirms that 3D on the console was always intended to be a gimmick.
Again, it's hilarious you're toting this as a bad thing.
So...people will just ignore the sticker on the handheld box?
The idea that the Nintendo faithful are trying to pass this off as "ITS FOR KIDS OKAY" is mind blowing. Especially when Nintendo themselves never stated such, and even released media of adults using the system.
According to Fils-Aime, the idea for the 2DS came from wanting to appeal to younger consumers, as the standard 3DS is aimed at players age seven and up.
Oddly enough my gba and gbc are still in pretty damn good shape. Maybe a few tiny hairline scratches on the screen at most.But the screens are now exposed to the elements
Mr and Mrs DS have some news for their children.....one of them is adopted.
Should be cheaper than $129 then no? I mean you can get an a cheap Android tablet for around $70 bucks. Something decent like the Kindle Fire isn't much more expensive either.
It seems like Nintendo really misjudged the Avatar hype as 3D hype.Also, I guess this confirms that 3D on the console was always intended to be a gimmick.
I don't know why you all keep whining about this, it's meant to be a Pokemon machine for 7 year old kids.
I wonder if you guys were so vocal at the release of the DS lite, DSi, and DSi XL. I'd imagine not though. It's pretty in vogue to shit on Nintendo for any reason these days.
It's mentioned in a hands-on article.Where did you hear this?!
That's the most bizarre practice I've ever heard (well, close to it).
Explains the lack of being foldable.
What?
It's the cheapest, doesn't fold, and plays all DS library (3D and 2D) games.
You guys need to find a new word to harp on because you've clearly lost the meaning for 'confusion'.
You can't even fucking fold it.