http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fucxG-he2qUChipopo said:man, the traditional graying of presidential hair is kicking in FAST for Obama
Stoney Mason said:Dude I could give a shit. I'm all talked out on teabagers except to ridicule them. And if you are a teabagger I'll equally ridicule you for the hypocrite and nutbag you are.
A protester is removed as he voices his opposition during a speech by U.S. President Barack Obama, during the University of Notre Dame commencement ceremonies in South Bend, Indiana, May 17, 2009.
I remember I saw a protest where a guy got up and started criticizing the Bush administration for running deficits and was booed off the stage. The majority of these protesters were not genuinely concerned with spending, they just wanted a platform to piss and moan about aLovingSteam said:And many of those at the protest voiced frustration with the Repubs. Why is it that those who continue to call these individuals extremists or nutbags don't make mention that they were upset with the republicans as well?
There is no way that Dems will pick up ten seats in 2010. They only picked up six seats in 2006 when everyone hated Bush, and only eight (nine if you count Specter, plus Franken may not even get in so that would bring it down to seven) in 2008 riding on Obama's popularity. Now, fourteen seats over three years is still pretty big, but not 60 -> 70 big.RurouniZel said:It will be much easier for Obama to push his plans and projects through congress if he has a defining majority (59/60 is technically a majority, but as we've all seen it's not quite enough to make the process smooth). If that number were to increase to say, 70, the Republicans would be all but powerless, and no amount of "No" votes would help them.
Deus Ex Machina said:PHOTOS We heard ya. Thanks. Bye.
LovingSteam said:Many who have a problem don't have it because the Church says to but rather because they believe that the fetus is a human life and killing a fetus = murder. You may disagree with their view however to assume its hypocrisy is wrong. Non catholics have issues with Obama's abortion policy as well.
quadriplegicjon said:most of those people probably support the death penalty. i think thats why people are calling them hypocrites.
faceless007 said:'Cause the guy leading them (and I'm talking specifically about Catholics) is supposed to be infallible.
'Cause the guy leading them (and I'm talking specifically about Catholics) is supposed to be infallible.mAcOdIn said:Edit: If you can take safety behind the concept of seperate government entities then why can't religious people take refuge behind the concept of different fucking centuries?
LovingSteam said:There was one example of the lady for CNN who said it was horrible how one person painted Obama as Hitler yet there was film of the same lady at a Iraq War protest who was laughing at a protetstor holding up a picture of bush made to resemble hitler.
laserbeam said:Except their is a difference between someone committing a crime the State views as punishable by death and and the other being an inconvenience so gotten rid of.
Also of note Norma McCorvey the Roe in Roe v Wade was arrested at Notre Dame as well while protesting against Obama.
Infallibility is limited to matters of Religious Dogma
As someone who's (somewhat) pro-life and against the death penalty, I find this argument lacking.quadriplegicjon said:most of those people probably support the death penalty. i think thats why people are calling them hypocrites.
Aaron Strife said:As someone who's (somewhat) pro-life and against the death penalty, I find this argument lacking.
Being pro-life is to accept that a fetus is a human, being aborted simply because the mother doesn't feel like bearing a child. The death penalty is for someone who had a chance at life and fucked up.
I'm not saying I agree with that position, but I can understand why one would hold it.
quadriplegicjon said:a human life is a human life.. doesnt it go against the teachings of jesus?
also not all abortions are due to inconveniences either so please dont lump them all like that.
And more importantly TAKE THE ABORTION DEBATE TO THE PROPER THREAD.Tamanon said:I think you might want to think about the reasons for abortion a bit more.
No. Hypocritcal extremist positions make you a nutbag. People who actually claim to care about fiscal responsibilty correctly see the tea bag protests for what they are. Sore losers who lost an election. If they are serious about their position stop being hypocritical and stop aligning yourself with other nutbags.Karma Kramer said:Stoney seems to think that non-violent protest makes you a nutbag? Wtf...
laserbeam said:I dont know if this is the thread to debate the merits of the death penalty via religious view but Jesus never actually once spoke out against the death penalty. The only case of the death penalty ever being brought to him was of Hypocrits trying to test him while not even following the law they were trying to test him on.
Stoney Mason said:No. Hypocritcal extremist positions make you a nutbag. People who actually claim to care about fiscal responsibilty correctly see the tea bag protests for what they are. Sore losers who lost an election. If they are serious about their position stop being hypocritical and stop aligning yourself with other nutbags.
Karma Kramer said:Perhaps but I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that the bailout of the banks is against some people's ideals... Its not entirely hypocritical, though I agree there is definitely the encouragement of "the other team" winning and now doing all of this.
I just think its unreasonable to call people nutbags regardless if they might be a little hypocritical.
Stoney Mason said:While I'm not a personal fiscal conservative I respect people who actually are or at least respect them if they hold and practice intellectual honesty. Those nutbags at the teabag parties weren't. They are a group of Republican voters whipped up by Fox News and Rush Limbaugh types. As I said if they were truly fiscal conservatives they certainly wouldn't be supporters of either party. Because Republicans neither cut spending nor do they cut the deficit. EVER!
There is legimitate discussions to have about fiscal restraint and none of them should involve Joe the Plumber types, or Republicans masquerading as fiscal hawks so they can bash the Democratic president. That's not even going into a lot of the bigotry or violence imagery that was present at some of these "tea parties".
Deus Ex Machina said:PHOTOS We heard ya. Thanks. Bye.
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/06tYaQv2Oq5Vk/610x.jpg[/IM]
[IMG]http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/09eR6VJ52b8OR/610x.jpg[/IM][/QUOTE]
[img]http://i41.tinypic.com/9fw7s5_th.jpg
:lol
Yeah, I simplified it.Tamanon said:I think you might want to think about the reasons for abortion a bit more.
Dan said:Seriously, why is that student protester smiling while holding up her abortion cap?
laserbeam said:I dont know if this is the thread to debate the merits of the death penalty via religious view but Jesus never actually once spoke out against the death penalty. The only case of the death penalty ever being brought to him was of Hypocrits trying to test him while not even following the law they were trying to test him on.
Sarah Palin was arguably the most influential person in 2008, but no one notices because she wasn't influential enough to overcome the deficits of her running mate and win the election.
Until Palin, 45, burst onto the scene, Obama was headed for a Nixon/McGovern landslide. Palin may not have changed the election result, but she killed what otherwise would have been a rout.
John McCain was so preposterous a candidate (at least on a Republican ticket) that Palin was responsible for far more votes than the usual vice-presidential candidate. The biggest red flag proving her popularity with normal Americans is that liberals won't shut up about her. Palin is a threat to liberals because she believes in God and country and family all values liberals pretend to believe in but secretly detest. There's a reason there's no "Stop Olympia Snowe before it's too late!" movement.
The American voter can be hornswoggled occasionally, but we can generally spot a real American, and that's what Sarah Palin is. She really was a housewife who went into politics because she didn't like the way her taxes were being spent. She really did take on the old-boy network the oil companies and her own party and won. And yes, she really did walk the walk on abortion when she found out she was carrying a Down-syndrome baby.
The combination of Palin's attractiveness as a candidate and her ability to expose liberals made her a celebrity among Republicans. The only thing I have against her is that she threatens to surpass me in attracting the left's hatred.
Deus Ex Machina said:A few more..
http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=54570921&postcount=765hben said:I had never thought about it before, but I do believe you are right. Though the term RINO was not around when Lincoln was president, I believe he may have been one of the first to fill the bill.Gopher P said:i would of supported the confederacy, most people dont realize that abraham lincoln was a genuinely evil man and a RINO
Desperado said:I'm sure I'm late on this, but have you guys read Ann Coulter's write-up on Palin for the Time 100?
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1894410_1894289_1894287,00.html
GrapeApes said:Here's some words of wisdom from Hannity forums. From a thread about which side would you be on during the Civil War. I think the first guy is trolling or a real loon.
http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=54570921&postcount=765
Desperado said:I'm sure I'm late on this, but have you guys read Ann Coulter's write-up on Palin for the Time 100?
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1894410_1894289_1894287,00.html
Abe Lincoln a RINO :lolGrapeApes said:Here's some words of wisdom from Hannity forums. From a thread about which side would you be on during the Civil War. I think the first guy is trolling or a real loon.
http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=54570921&postcount=765
C'mon Ann . . . put your money where your mouth is and donate a ton of money to her and do personal appearances for her. I am so eager to see Palin as the 2012 candidate.Desperado said:I'm sure I'm late on this, but have you guys read Ann Coulter's write-up on Palin for the Time 100?
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1894410_1894289_1894287,00.html
There is a difference between the two parties . . . but I agree the system needs change. Instant run-off voting and proportional representation. The two-party system sucks.JayDubya said:Well, they don't elaborate, so it's just mysterious and dumb. It's worth noting how the Democratic-Republican party has changed multiple times and the Republican party has done the same since its inception (part and parcel of why I think the two-party system is borked).
quadriplegicjon said:most of those people probably support the death penalty. i think thats why people are calling them hypocrites.
PhoenixDark said:McCain probably would have done worse without Palin on the ticket.
speculawyer said:C'mon Ann . . . put your money where your mouth is and donate a ton of money to her and do personal appearances for her. I am so eager to see Palin as the 2012 candidate.
Of course, I know you won't . . . you're just sideshow freak that makes lots of money of your fundamentalist base. You live in blue state areas, drink wine, have premarital sex, never got married, never had a kid . . . we know what you are.
Really? I thought Obama's speech was awful. He started off great ("Apparently these degrees are hard to come by...I'm only 1 for 2" :lol...fuck you ASU) but I don't think really any one cared for what he will now use as his tenure's stance on abortion. Not that he shouldn't have addressed the situation, just thought way too much time was spent on a topic we were already to move on about.Nazgul_Hunter said:That's awesome... those girls are friends of mine!
I was a little far from the stage, but both Obama's and Fr. Jenkins' speeches were very good, and the crowd drowning out the protestors was very nice, though the atmosphere got a little tense after that because everyone was expecting something else to happen...
Yeah . . . The "Prince of Peace" who said 'love thy enemy' and 'turn the other cheek' was clearly pro-death. And apparently pro-torture according most Christians.laserbeam said:I dont know if this is the thread to debate the merits of the death penalty via religious view but Jesus never actually once spoke out against the death penalty.