Red_taiyaki
Member
Assuming that these are true, I'm a bit surprised hasn't looked into adding a smart glass-type or Wii U game pad controller with the Vita.
This isn't the same as PS2-PS3. The loss of BC just devalues the PS2 library. The loss of BC devalues both the PS3 library and the PSN account.
Long term it becomes meaningless just like now, but seems like early adopters might as well just wait until they are done with the PS3 library now or just get a 720.
Overall i expect it to be in therms of PC hardware on mid range with certain elements like CPU being above or equal to best PC CPUs.
Closed platform with above hardware will again give normal console cycle (meaning consoles being above PC for year or two)
Assuming that these are true, I'm a bit surprised hasn't looked into adding a smart glass-type or Wii U game pad controller with the Vita.
Already seeing it mentioned for Handhelds but early on this year an article I read had 3D stacked RAM as not a PC option for a few years because PC users like to be able to choose their own RAM Configurations. So handhelds, tablets and CE platforms but not PCs. This means that it's likely that Game consoles will be some of the first CE equipment to have performance 3D stacked ultra wide IO DRAM rather than Low Power. This is why the Kabini (Tablet) design is more likely to have ultrawide IO DRAM than Kaveri the desktop design.my point for dividing ram is exactly what you said.
Unified pool is pro dev and we can all agree it is better for system. But if they won't come up with resolution to bus speed giving system slow Ram will be huge bottleneck especially if next gen will require high bathwind which is 99% sure they will need.
Without it, it is either devided pool what i described or Nintendo Wii U way (meaning no next gen games).
Of course there is quick resolution to that problem meaning 4-8GB of GDDR5 but we both now that won't happen because cost will be to high.
As of 2.5D 3D stacking i can't say anything about it as much as anyone. Jeff as always provide a lot of usefull info but until we see it being used anywhere in industry we don't know if it will even make on time for new consoles.
All bullshi IMO.
Couldn't care less about BC. PS3 ain't going anywhere.
Ugh, you can keep BC if it means doing it that way.Then again, hopefully Gaikai will save us if that should ever happen.
400 to 450 would be sweet if they include all the good stuff.
Ugh, you can keep BC if it means doing it that way.
Most of that has to be BS. It looks more like a suicide note.
specially the 400-500 euro thing that can not be real.
Too middling.Hey guys. If DDR3 is too slow and DDR5 is too expensive. How about DDR4?
I hope too but I know some are targeting 720p for Durango, and for now. Of course with top notch AA, and I don't know at which framerate.I hope it's STRONGLY discouraged by Microsoft and Sony to not release 1080p native software. 720p is the past just as much as 480i is.
If Vita is dying, then Shi will live!
If Vita is dying, then Shi will live!
Good point, funny enough, the same people who would say that they need bc would comeback and complain that the would-be PS4 is too expensive since it will need the ps3 chipset for the backwards compatibility that they are asking for. It was the same with the PS3, the PS2 chipset in the PS3 made it more expensive than it would have been and 99% percent of people who bought ps3's didn't play PS2 games on it beyond the first month or ever.The amount of people that actually care about BC or would look for it as a feature of a new console has only been shrinking and shrinking. The vast majority don't care. Of all of my gamer friends I am the only one on gaf or that spends anytime actually talking about games. I don't think one of them has mentioned the words BC since the PS2 era. Also it's slightly insane that people would boycott a new system for new games(why do you want a new system anyways if not for new experiences?) When they have the console necessary to play their old games its just....pointless
Good point, funny enough, the same people who would say that they need bc would comeback and complain that the would-be PS4 is too expensive since it will need the ps3 chipset for the backwards compatibility that they are asking for. It was the same with the PS3, the PS2 chipset in the PS3 made it more expensive than it would have been and 99% percent of people who bought ps3's didn't play PS2 games on it beyond the first month or ever.
Of course it'll be 720p with "top notch" FXAA at 30 fps. Every bit about what they're both doing is pointing into the direction of cheap hardware with as little additional R&D as possible.I hope too but I know some are targeting 720p for Durango, and for now. Of course with top notch AA, and I don't know at which framerate.
As far as I know, not much people knows anything about Orbis yet. Maybe 1st Party have specifications, but I doubt third party are even remotely close to own devkits yet. Could be wrong though. (Hope so tbh)
I'd pay up to $100 more to have BC. Sony, take note.