MvmntInGrn
Member
Advertising and money have an influence, doubting that is flat out naive. Maybe the difference without Orson would be minimal, but what about without 10, 20, or 100 or him?Acosta said:Having a fuckton of money doesn't give him a machine to to control minds. And the end, people votes what they feel.
As you look altered, I'll put clearly to you. With no Orson doing a campaign, the result would have been the same.
You stop as many little factors as you can, they do add up.