Many of us have put a lot of thought into this, far more than it deserves honestly. Fact of the matter is that Gies is simply an arrogant egotist who refuses to admit he is fallible in any way. If he had any humbleness or cared in any way about the people who read his opinions in search of actual reliable information, he would have 1) never said what he said, and 2) admitted he was incorrect long, long ago when he was proven wrong the very next day.
Actions speak louder than written words, and his actions speak for themselves time and time again. Sometimes, a duck is simply a duck and you can't expect it to be anything else. Gies "opinions" can not be trusted.