Kintaro said:
True, but even if there was an exchange of words, the moment she lunged was the moment she crossed the line.
Perhaps he was just being a dick. Maybe they should have ignored him?
Fact is, she physically attacked him first. At that point, everything else becomes secondary.
We have two issues here
The first is the instigation
The Second is the assault
He should not have instigated, responded, prolonged a volatile situation. He was drunk and if this is how he acts when drunk he should consider his future drinking habit. I have no idea if she would have lunged without his provocation, but im guessing its far less likely, so he has to take responsibility for that. Just because we may not be the original instigator doesnt mean we dont have responsibility over our part of the situation, he reacted wrong.
The Assault itself, well its hard to say, i can only answer it two ways. Because he was drunk instinct played a much greater role, attack=defend as best you can, obviously his motor skills were somewhat impaired. Its hard to judge someones behaviour when they are not in complete control of their faculties other to say "you should have been in control of your faculties, that is your irresponsibility that you were not" so really all i can say to him is, dont drink as much.
If he was sober id expect him to assess the situation far better, im sure the instigation would not have taken place and further im sure if she had assaulted him he would have measured the situation accordingly. Is it ok to hit a woman? Well i dont think theres a blakc and white answer to that, there are so many variables. I think the base theory i follow is that, if in the situation that is the only way to protect myself then i dont see a reason why i wouldnt, but its situation dependent. I cant say the OP is a douche all i can say is he is a bad drunk, thats the only value judgement i can make.